Manufacturing

Hello,I have balanced MOVE transactions.  I want to release them via the “Release AM Documents” screen.  However, when I open the Release AM Documents screen, nothing is displayed for me to release.Any thoughts? 

Unable to create production order from inventory planning display (MRP) screen

Hello,I have active BOMs in the system.  When I open the Cost Roll screen, no BOMs show up in the grid to be selected.  2023R2Any thoughts why my BOMs aren’t showing up?

I have a client who is starting to use MRP and there are old orders that are coming up. Orders from 2017 that are completed, however they are still on MRP. How can these easily be cleared? I am sure I am just missing something simple.  

Hi! I'm looking for a sales margin report, itemized based off invoices. Like the Sales Profitability Analysis GI that comes out of the box. The catch is for cost I need to include the material and labor breakdown for manufactured items. Does anyone have a GI or know which table might contain this information?

Hello Acumatica, We are using Acumatica 20.203.0028 and my client always have a Issue, when Release transaction Materials > The IN Issue was created is blank or sometimes on hold/ balance IN Issue. It depends to the Finished goods costand this is not only Material, it belongs when Released Move too sometimes the stock is doesn’t receipt, because the transaction IN Receipt blank Inventory or on hold/ balance Status Have anyone have this issue too?this case is not to all transaction, sometimes it will happen, sometimes is not. what should I do? Here are the transaction created from Material and Move  

Cost Roll only seems to work if you are using standard costs.Is it possible to do a cost roll if you are using average costs?

Help description says you can still post transactions to closed production orders.  What kind of transactions would these be?You can’t issue material or labor, so what is this referring to?Any thoughts? 

We utilize the product configurator capability and learned today that we have been creating production orders within a sales order with expired BOM’s.  The Bom revision changed to Rev B and Rev A was set to On Hold and with an expired date.  The customer service team entered the make to order sales order and created the production order within the sales order as normal.  Production orders were created with the obsolete BOM revision.  Obviously we need to update the configurator now to the current active rev.  I’m surprised the configurator wouldn’t error out in creating production orders with expired and on hold BOM’s.  

We have a client using configurator for make to order items. Production Orders are linked to Sales Order lines. But when MRP runs, it doesn’t seem to recognize these links. MRP is allocating any current as yet unshipped and differently configured inventory to satisfy the next-to-ship sales orders, even though those orders are linked to existing open production orders.Does anyone have ideas on how to get MRP to use the linked production orders instead?

Is there a way you can re order the lines on a Sales Order or Quote? I can see Line Nbr and Line Order columns, but they are not editable. Ideally when we’ve finished constructing a Sales Order/Quote, we’d like to sort the quote by Inventory ID (ascending) and then reorder the lines so they appear in the desired order.

Does Acumatica have any option to substitute the Component material in production?

Hello community, We are getting an error when we release materials on a production order and not all of the BOM components are showing up on the Materials Wizard 2.I'm able to do a partial release on materials that prompt up, when I attempt to release the remainder of the parts on the bill of materials components, the release materials are blank, it is now showing the rest of the materials that need to be allocated to the production order.I made a change on the test environment to change the “Data Entry Settings” to “Do Not Allow” for Under Issue Materials and tried to do the move; we receive an error that not all materials are issued to the production order, so we were unable to close the move, but when we tried to release the rest of the materials, the page blank.

where can i view consumption per part number ? Thank you. 

I can not get my Item costs(Avg cost) to report on the stock items GI table. They all report as zero.

We recently started scanning production tickets from operation to operation, in doing so we had some users who were incorrectly scanning operations in multiple times.ie. A production ticket called for 100 on operation 10 and 20 but say they scanned 500 in for operation 10 and 100 for operation 20 which would then complete the production ticket but also cause a variance (We are backflushing labor/overhead and materials and also Standard Cost on items) We’ve been running cycle counts to correct the raw materials but not sure what else we can do to fix this.We now have a very high balance in our WIP Variance Account which I believe is overstating our cost of goods. I can’t think of a way in the system to correct this since all of these production tickets are closed.I’m no financial guru so I may be thinking about this incorrectly. But our cost of goods the last 2 months have been extremely high. Looking for any help to sort this out. Thanks!

Hi there,a customer of us wants to have configurable articles. He also has variants of his articles which are machines. So each variant of a series can have configurations which are only decided on while producing the product. Now, I was wondering what happens if I use such a configuration article for MRP, e.g. since I want to have a safety stock of 10 machines. Will the MRP only consider the BOM part oder will it suggest to buy/ build the whole configuration possibilities? Or before clicking on order in the MRP screen, do I need to configure the article and then one type of configured article will be planned with 10 pieces? The question then is, how will acumatica know that I have this concrete instance 10 times in my stock and not the other possible variations? (machines with other configurations) I assume that it is not foreseen that acumatica works with configurations in stock?  Thank you very much in advance.Best Wi

Hi, We recently upgraded to 2022r2 build 211 and noticed when we use the scan materials on the mobile app, that it no longer asks to scan the lot/serial number. a majority of our items use lot/serial numbers so this is a big issue. This was working on our previous version 2021r1.Is anyone else aware of this or know a fix for this?

Hello.My company manufactures and distributes Gas Analyzers, Chromatographs and multiple spare/supporting parts. As you can imagine, we are using assemblies, sub-assemblies and multi-level BOM’s to build our production orders.Our boss tasked us with determining how many Analyzers and Chromatographs we can build (based off the parts in the BOM) with the current stock we have on the shelf in Inventory. Any ideas on how I can go about finding out that information? Can Acumatica calculate this for us?Please advise.Any help would be greatly appreciated. Very Best,

I am seeking assistance in configuring our inventory label printing process to generate labels based on item class or warehouse, rather than the current setup of printing labels by receipt.The use case behind this request is the implementation of handheld scanners for cycle counting purposes. In this context, it is imperative that bin locations are labeled with essential information such as item ID, warehouse, and location. We have modified the report to include barcodes for warehouse and location on these to facilitating efficient scan and count operations.Thanks!

Is there a list somewhere of fixes and/or added functionality going from 2022R2 to 2023R2?

We have recently updated our overhead rates on some of our Work Centers. when applying labor to a production order that was created before the update date the old rate is being used. If the production order was created after the update it is using the new rate. Is this a bug or a feature? if it is a feature is there a way to have the older production order use the new rate? 

The MRP whitepaper (which is excellent by the way) has the following diagramBut the paper doesn’t address which calendar is used for counting days. From my testing, it appears that MRP uses (regular) calendar days when looking at consolidating production orders. When looking at consolidating production orders:is that correct should it use the manufacturing calendar instead?

According to the help the BUCKET DAYS in the MRP Preferences and the DAYS OF SUPPLY in the stock item are doing exactly the same, even if they have different labels.If I only use the MRP Preferences (without overriding the days of supply in the item) nothing is consolidated!Only if I override the “days of supply” on the stock item, the demand of this item will be consolidated.Is there any purpose behind the “bucket days” in the MRP Preferences?My assumption was that this is the general set up for all “MRP-Items” & the field on the stock item is for overriding the set up for this specific item. 

Hey community ! Hope you are all doing well!I have a a production order which is completed but still has some material that has not been released.I am unable to release it now and the late assignment is not doing anything.The inventory is also showing up on allocation details as Production demand, wanted to clean this out before we start using MRP.Allocation DetailsCan someone please help in understanding how to fix this. Also, to avoid this in future, if I select do not allow in the following setting, this will not allow users to complete the production order until the material is issued/allocated to the production order correct?