Manufacturing

When I link an open Purchase Order to a Production Order using the PO Link button, the PO and Line do not show on the outside process tab. Does that tab only show the PO when you create the PO from the Production Order? 

Hello Has anyone seen this error? I added Mass Actions to a GI for Production Order Ticket, but when I try to mass edit them or even one, I get this error. I was looking to complete or cancel multiples at once.  

As shown in the screenshot below, we understand that when a Move transaction is performed, the system should create both: The Move Transaction, and The corresponding Cost Transaction. This is not the actual screenshot; it was taken from the local system. In our case, we can only see the yellow-highlighted Move transaction line. The Cost Transaction shown above does not appear in the Production Order. We have identified an issue where, after completing a Move transaction, the Cost Transaction is not being created for that specific Move.As a result, the system generates a

If a user does not have any previous Time Clock entries created in the browser, the mobile app does not have an option to + Add a new entry.I’ve seen demos in YouTube that show a + button to start new entries.We checked settings and user rights.The user can create new clock entries in the browser, but not in the app.Any suggestions? Thanks 

We were eagerly awaiting 2025R1 to be able to cancel/correct purchase receipts without having to go through AP to get the process completed.  We were hoping for a simple reversal feature that could make things easier when a mistake was made.I’m just now learning that if we want to use the purchase receipt cancel/correct functionality, the Manufacturing or Service Management functionality cannot be enabled in the Enable/Disable Features. Does anyone know the reason why this feature is not available if you use the Manufacturing or Service Management functions?

The action dates for the purchase items shown in the inventory planning display do not match, even though all the purchase items within the box are used to manufacture the same item for the same sales order. Additionally, no lead time is specified for these purchase items, and there is no available quantity in the warehouse. 

Hi All. Do you know why I get this error when linking the BOM in Production Order. The Production order was created from SO if that helps, but there were also 2 items in SO that was marked for Production and linking the BOM is fine without error. Can you please help? 

Hi everyone Just wondering if anyone else is experiencing this issue in Engineering Workbench and Visual BOM. In BOM, the Subassembly Item BOM is set to Revision B.But in Visual BOM and Engineering Workbench, it pulls in BOM Revision A. Is this intended behaviour of these two screens? Revision A is not the default BOM for the subassembly. Thanks for your input. 

HI, I would like to confirm the MRP configuration at the stock item level in line with the latest 2025 R1 updates. I have completed the configuration and tested a few MRP cycles, which are attached for your reference.Could you please help confirm whether the configured process flows are aligned with the expected standard behavior? Additionally, I would appreciate clarification on a few questions related to the results observed during testing.  

We are on 25R2 modern UI and using the New Release Process for Manufacturing.  I have seen two glitches so far, and wondered if anyone else has seen these in their instance:A Move that completes an operation no longer records Actual Start Date and Actual End Date in the AMProdOper (Production Details, routing section) table.  We have critical reports that rely on these dates, and they are broken right now due to this issue. The final Move (production receipt) for a linked Production Order to SO Line no longer allocates the inventory to the SO Line.  You have to delete the SO Line and re-add it to invoice the sales order.  The issue this creates for us is that the production order loses the link to the Sales Order, also breaking critical reports that help us report on stock product versus build-to-order product.I don’t see a way to undo the New Release Process, but I would like to.

Hello.  has anyone ever seen this error? First time I’ve seen it.  It came up after completing a refresh to our test environment from production and rolling costs.  

Hi Everyone, I’d like to pass a list of values instead of calling out the items 1 by 1. There are many options in the conditions drop down. But the documentation does not specify how they should be used, or provide limitations.  

Hello,We keep getting this error when trying to Issue Materials.This is happening for all finished products we are making using the item 00029049, regardless of lot. We had previously made production orders using this item numerous dozens of times before, most recently just four months ago. As I have highlighted, we have sufficient qty. On Hand, Available and Available for Shipping (we also have an equal amount as Available for Issue).There is no qty. allocated:We have checked the BOM and it is OK.We have deleted and recreated the Production Orders (using various lots we have on hand to see if it was truly a warehouse, warehouse location or allocation issue - it is n

Does anyone know of a tool to mass update/copy/populate BOMs or Production Orders? My company is an engineer-to-order business that manufacture custom products under 4-5 product lines. For instance, Product Line #1 can have a seemingly infinite number of one-off configurations. To capture these types of products we typically use an “empty” BOM with just the routing and use the production order as the document where the BOM gets filled out (combined effort from estimating/project management/engineering departments). However, our end users are facing some difficulty with the time it takes to populate / mass-update production orders. For instance, we typically see sales orders of 80-100 repeatable (or non-repeatable which takes longer) one-off products that all fall under the same product line. These are specific to the customer and do not all ship at the same time so we choose to break them up by the ship date. So typically we would see a Sales Order with 8

Hi Community,I’m looking to get your thoughts on ETO manufacturing and custom-built subassemblies.  Our client does a tremendous amount of Engineer-to-Order manufacturing.  In many cases, their solutions may ultimately be built once, which may also include a reasonably large portion of their subassemblies, such as laser-cut sheet metal parts.  The custom products and subassemblies often fit nicely into a handful of product classes, but in their current state, they are often creating new SKUs for ETO product and subassembly.  These parts are virtually never in inventory beyond the time necessary to issue them to a production order or ship the FG to the customer.  The client will be using CADLink, which will be used to generate SKUs, BOMs, and to update Production Orders. We can continue down this path, which is fine.  With that said, it feels as though there could be some potential benefit of creating skeleton SKUs and BOMs representing generic versions of these product

Has anyone developed a system where the move transaction can be done in batches similar to how the materials wizard functions? We release materials when a production order is completed in house so we do the materials and move transaction one right after the other. The materials wizard allows us to release materials for dozens of production orders if needed, but now we need that same functionality but for the move transactions.

I am looking for a way to add dock-to-stock period into MRP planning (does not need to be part number specific, can be one stock period for all parts) so we get a purchase part in a day or two before our schedule actually shows we need it. Lead time additions will just order the part earlier, not bring it in earlier. Anyone else have a solution to this? I feel like it's right there in front of me, but can’t seem to locate the solution. 

Cannot delete revision nor choose which revision from which to copy to a new revisionIn the product configurator module, I made a new revision (AF) on CFG0000030, but in doing so, I made a sizable error that I cannot easily undo. What I want to do is delete revision AF, go back to revision AE, and have that be the basis for yet another revision for the rest of the edits I need to make. However, the system does not allow me to delete revision AF. I can only inactivate it. If I do this, AF remains the basis for the new revision (call it ‘AG’). Is there anything I can do here?

I’ve done many different import scenarios and regularly make mass changes to our item configurations as we’re preparing for go-live with Acumatica Manufacturing and finalizing how everything will need to be structured. However, I’ve run into this problem that I can’t resolve.We have about 600 configurable items, each with close to 200 lines of options, so making any changes manually is really not an option.Currently, all the configurations are set to revision “0” and are in the pending status, so I can make any needed updates with an import scenario. However, once we are live with this, we’ll need to increment the revision number on all the configurations whenever there is a change, which happens frequently.I’ve attached a screenshot of my update scenario mapping below. The line circled in red is the one that is causing the error. I’m simply trying to take the value from the data provider and increment it by 1. The error that it throws is

Hello!I was wondering if anyone had this issue when using this setting on the Production Order Types screen.I turned this on to better track our subassemblies so everything can be categorized under the parent production order #. But what’s weird is that it causes the Production Order # to skip a bunch of iterations, seemingly at random.See below for a screenshot. These were all Production Orders that were created within the last ~5 days. And I am certain that there is no way that someone created around 7000 Production Orders only to delete them in that timeframe.For some reason it jumps from POP027009-000 → POP027746-000 all the way to the most recent which is POP037933-000. And i

Where do you guys download device hub? 

When updating the Safety Stock and other settings on the INVENTORY PLANNING tab of a stock item, the new value carries over to all existing item warehouse details records for the item. Shouldn’t it only carry over to whatever the default warehouse is? It seems undesirable for it to update all warehouse detail records because each warehouse could have its own safety stock. This is on 25R1 25.101.0153.5. I understand that when multiple warehouses are available that the planning settings should be updated on the individual item warehouse details records. However, it becomes confusing for users when there may only be 2 warehouses (one ‘Main’ and a secondary back up warehouse). It’s easier to simply update the safety stock on the stock item and have that setting carry over to the warehouse detail record for the default warehouse, rather than also updating the secondary warehouse. Is this expected behavior?