Manufacturing

Hi, client has several Operation .Is there a way to restrict certain users from entering a Move trx for certain Operations or Workcenters? I tried RowData Security, no option for WorkCenters;  but I tried to use the Warehouse linked to the WorkCenter;  but it did not work. Business Case.  Op worker entering movement for the WC he is working and not a different workcenter.ie,  Assembly vs Packing vs Quality Control.

Has anyone developed a system where the move transaction can be done in batches similar to how the materials wizard functions? We release materials when a production order is completed in house so we do the materials and move transaction one right after the other. The materials wizard allows us to release materials for dozens of production orders if needed, but now we need that same functionality but for the move transactions.

Here is the scenarioAllow Preassigning Lot/Serial Numbers flag is flagged in Production Order type screenLot/Serial Class created with assignment method “When Received”Serial number is pre-assigned to the Parent FG : Example SER0001. when the production order was created.FG has 3 sub assemblies..  Assembly 1Assembly 2Assembly 3 When the assembly is produced - the same serial number generated for the parent unit (SER0001) should be reused/assigned for each assembly Item when it it moved. Has anyone come across this scenario? Any thoughts or insights? 

This is happening on a client and I cannot find the reason why the generated cost transaction has a different branch to the labour transaction, so it is causing incorrect GL entries.The data is all entered on the correct branch, so any ideas why the system generated cost transaction would have another branch to the source?

I have production orders that span multiple months, but the Qty to Produce is just 1 unit (e.g., large machinery or equipment). Since Acumatica only posts overhead at the time of the final move, all overhead gets booked in a single month — even though the production activity and costs are spread across multiple months.This creates challenges in monthly financial reporting, as it overstates costs in one month and understates them in the others.

I created a new screen that has workflow code on it. i followed the T270 series to make it. I am having issues with disabling an action conditionally. I want the “Remove Hold” button to be disabled whenever a line item is added that has a “Stock Replenishment Type” of “Manufacture” and the Bar ID is null. In the below picture, the removed hold button should be disabled because line 1 and 3 are empty in the bar id. i have the field conditionally required, but it will still put it on hold even though an error will pop up saying that the field has to be filled out. i tried adding it in a row selected event. i also tried to do it in the workflow. but it doesnt ever get disabled. can someone tell me what i am doing wrong?protected void _(Events.RowSelected<ProtoCutLine> e, PXCache cache){    ProtoCutLine row = e.R

Hello Has anyone seen this error? I added Mass Actions to a GI for Production Order Ticket, but when I try to mass edit them or even one, I get this error. I was looking to complete or cancel multiples at once.  

Hi All,We have a client looking at multiple nesting products and at this point they are most interested in SigmaNest.  https://www.sigmanest.com/en Does anyone have any experience with these folks?  Good or Bad?  Thx in advance!

Hi Community,I’m looking to get your thoughts on ETO manufacturing and custom-built subassemblies.  Our client does a tremendous amount of Engineer-to-Order manufacturing.  In many cases, their solutions may ultimately be built once, which may also include a reasonably large portion of their subassemblies, such as laser-cut sheet metal parts.  The custom products and subassemblies often fit nicely into a handful of product classes, but in their current state, they are often creating new SKUs for ETO product and subassembly.  These parts are virtually never in inventory beyond the time necessary to issue them to a production order or ship the FG to the customer.  The client will be using CADLink, which will be used to generate SKUs, BOMs, and to update Production Orders. We can continue down this path, which is fine.  With that said, it feels as though there could be some potential benefit of creating skeleton SKUs and BOMs representing generic versions of these product

As shown in the screenshot below, we understand that when a Move transaction is performed, the system should create both: The Move Transaction, and The corresponding Cost Transaction. This is not the actual screenshot; it was taken from the local system. In our case, we can only see the yellow-highlighted Move transaction line. The Cost Transaction shown above does not appear in the Production Order. We have identified an issue where, after completing a Move transaction, the Cost Transaction is not being created for that specific Move.As a result, the system generates a

In 2025 R1, we have noticed that the production order type is not copied to child subassemblies.  This worked properly in 2024 R2 and prior versions.  This is what we’re seeing:Generate Order Subassemblies generates subassemblies using the default production order type from the Production Preferences screen Critical Assemblies side panel – The Order Type is read only on Create Production Order pop-up Critical Assemblies stand alone screen – Order type can be changed but doesn’t have any effect.  Regardless of the selection, the child orders use the default production order type from Production Preferences.Any

Hi All. Do you know why I get this error when linking the BOM in Production Order. The Production order was created from SO if that helps, but there were also 2 items in SO that was marked for Production and linking the BOM is fine without error. Can you please help? 

I’ve got a Outside Processing Production Order that uses Purchase Orders to complete one of the steps, however, upon release of the Purchase Receipt, nothing happens. All of them are linked together, however, the qty on the specific line in the production order is unfulfilled. Is there a specific step that I missed that would be causing this issue.The Production Order’s Link to the POThe Purchase OrderPurchase Receipt

I’m trying to produce a PO for a outside process production order, and keep getting the “At Least one item has not been processed” and the PO isn’t created. The trace log doesn’t seem to give any indication of what the error could be or how to solve it. I’ve attached images of the PO and Trace Log for reference. 

Good day,I have production order that has issue with Planned vs. Actual.  The variance is way out of whack.  The cost correct.  The material amounts are all correct.  The Planned is on target.  The issue is the actual.  How could this happen?  The BOM is on point.  We have used it many times in the past.Any suggestions? Or areas to look?See screenshot below.Thank you in advance for your assistance.Evan 

I have a client that purchases used equipment for refurbishing. They do not always know if an item can be refurbished at the time of purchase. One of the operations in production is to assess the item. If an item cannot be refurbished for sale, it gets put back into inventory in a quarantine location using a negative material transaction. Eventually the item is parted out using a disassembly production order to get as much value out of the item and the parted items are used for future repairs and refurbishments. There is labor incurred in the disassembly process however we cannot get the cost of labor allocated to the parted-out items. Is it possible to capitalize labor as part of the disassemble transaction? I tried recording a labor transaction as both a positive and negative and, in both cases, it ends up in the WIP adjustment entry for the difference between the parted-out items and the cost of the item being disassembled.

We are a manufacturing company using 2023R2 and we are trying to find a process where we can pre invoice some of our clients before we ship the product.  

We are unable to close a production order. It might have been forcefully completed or a move transaction deleted. Need guidance to resolve this and close the production order. Inventory module cannot be closed due to this error.Missing Move Transaction: When I click one of the move transaction numbers, it doesn’t react. It seems like it was forcefully deleted. Production order status: Completed.How can I resolve this to close the books?

Cannot delete revision nor choose which revision from which to copy to a new revisionIn the product configurator module, I made a new revision (AF) on CFG0000030, but in doing so, I made a sizable error that I cannot easily undo. What I want to do is delete revision AF, go back to revision AE, and have that be the basis for yet another revision for the rest of the edits I need to make. However, the system does not allow me to delete revision AF. I can only inactivate it. If I do this, AF remains the basis for the new revision (call it ‘AG’). Is there anything I can do here?

Hello ,I am facing this issue i am not able to get the qty to produce in production detail screen for all the work centers. 

Has anyone else experienced issues with labor recording since the 25R1 patch was deployed on 11/5?We use Acumatica’s mobile app for our shop floor employees to record labor time on production orders. Since the update, we’ve been unable to record any labor time. When attempting to access Manufacturing Clock Entry on the app, we receive the following error message:“Object reference not set to an instance of an object.”We’ve been in contact with our VAR, who has escalated the issue to Acumatica support, but we’re now into day two without the ability to record production labor.If anyone else is encountering the same issue or has found a workaround, please share.

This is my mappingThis is the errorHere is the GICan anyone look at this and tell me what these ultimately means? Feels like I am close to something but need help. Do I need to map more for validation?