Manufacturing

Is there anyone that has come up with a way to split a production order after production has started, manually, that allows for the order to be tied back to the original order for quality compliance?If so, how are you doing it?We are trying to use Acumatica 2026.Example: 100 pc are put into production 7 steps into production we need to split the order due to some issue. 50 will be completed as originally planned and 50 will go through some other process before being shipped to the customer.We need to maintain the history of the entire production order for quality purposes. Even if it requires a custom report and some way to flag the orders to put them together.Using Lots or serial numbers are not an option.

Hi, While releasing “Materials” transaction for Non-stock items , no inventory transactions (issue transactions) get recorded however for “Purchase Receipt” there is inventory transaction (receipt) get created. Is it expected behavior or I am missing something ? I have observed that scenario in 25R1. Please help me 

Hello everyone, We are evaluating the Zebra RS2100 and Zebra ET40/ET45 for use with Acumatica and would love to hear from anyone currently using either device.How has your experience been with the integration? Have you encountered any challenges with scanning, inventory transactions, performance, connectivity, or device management? Overall, would you recommend these devices for warehouse or manufacturing operations using Acumatica?Any lessons learned, pros/cons, or recommendations would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance!

Hello Acumatica Community,I would like to ask for advice on an issue in the Production module (Material Issuing to Production Order).Our setup:Glove types: Exam, Household, Industrial and Surgical. Production method: Lot-type production, which runs continuously. BOM types: Compound, Unpack and Pack. Warehouses: We have separate warehouses for the Compound, Production and Packing processes.The issue:Materials are issued (released) to the production order only at the end of production, just before the last batch is released. By that time, the earlier batches have already been moved from the Production warehouse to the Packing warehouse. As a result, the material cost is not allocated to all batches of the order.Questions:What is the recommended way to ensure the material cost is allocated to all batches of the order in this scenario?Should materials be issued progressively (for example, per batch) instead of once at the end? If so, how do others handle this in continuous lot-type product

The below has been submitted to our support partner.Issue: A PXLockViolation error is thrown when attempting to save a change to the production order warehouse for a production order with a linked sales order, when the "Yes" option is selected in the popup dialogue to also change the warehouse on the line of the related sales order.This error is present when no customizations are published and the sales demo data is loaded, so it is very simple to reproduce.  Confirmed Affected Versions:26.100.0175.2 26.100.0175.5 26.200.0334   Steps to Reproduce:  Create a production order from a sales order, or link an existing sales order and production order. Ensure the Production order is in the Planned status.  Change the production order warehouse.  In the popup dialogue box that asks, "Do you want to update the warehouse in the <1> line of the <SO> <SO009312> sales order?" click "Yes".  Attempt to save the production order.  The error message "Error: Another process ha

Hello,  When I am creating production orders from different screens, the default scheduling method value is different. Is there someone who knows how this value gets defaulted exactly?Thank You!

Our production lines use the same inventory items across multiple buildings and production areas. Each work center has dedicated inventory locations that are physically closest to where the material is consumed. However, when material is issued to production, Acumatica defaults to the item's single "Default Issue From" location. We then have it set up to pull inventory from the next available location if there is none available in the Default location. We understand that each user can change the issue location during the Material release process, but we are faced with several challenges related to this task.Additional manual steps for every material issue to change locations. Increased risk of selecting the wrong location. Inventory inaccuracies when material is physically consumed from one location, but system transactions are recorded against another. Difficulty maintaining accurate on-hand balances across multiple buildings and production areas. We’d like the system to automati

I am trying to create production order in holidays which is mentioned in exception of work calendar but its allowing me to do production.

Standard Acumatica practices for Loan GRN / Settlement: we are occasionally receiving materials from our competitors on loan, to be settled at a later date. What is the standard Acumatica Practices?

Hi everyone Just wondering if anyone else is experiencing this issue in Engineering Workbench and Visual BOM. In BOM, the Subassembly Item BOM is set to Revision B.But in Visual BOM and Engineering Workbench, it pulls in BOM Revision A. Is this intended behaviour of these two screens? Revision A is not the default BOM for the subassembly. Thanks for your input. 

Hello, From what I can see this is a common bug in 25R2; what we were wondering was what the most time efficient solution was for this bug. Currently, If it is stuck or unallocating, we clear the production and redo everything. We are an on-prem company so we do have direct db access: does anyone have a quicker way for us to fix this? Is there a scripting way we can do it?

I am trying to figure out why my WIP report AM654000 is not corresponding to my WIP GL its not like i have multiple WIP accounts I have 1 but the ending balance on the GL is way less that the balance on the WIP report

When entering a Clock Entry for Production Orders, the Order Type dropdown displays "No Value", even though there are two Production Order Types configured in the system.In the Mobile App, the Order Type is automatically populated based on the Default Order Type specified in Production Preferences. However, when creating the Clock Entry through the application, the system is not displaying the available Order Types and instead shows "No Value" in the dropdown. As a result other order type production Nbr is not visible in production Nbr field.Could you please confirm whether this behavior is expected and advise why the configured Production Order Types are not being displayed for selection?we can select the order type when we enter the Clock entry in web browser from drop down menu

We have 25R2 and when we create a vendor shipment for a Production Order, if material is not in OI-WIP at that time, the material shows 0 on the Material Move of the Production Order once the vendor shipment is confirmed even though we transfer the material from a bin location to OI-WIP prior to confirming the vendor shipment.We now have about 5 vendor shipments that show On Hold, yet the Production Orders are completed.  Material is NOT being taken out of inventory even though the vendor shipment does have the quantities shipped on them.Has anyone else had this issue?  If so, do you know a fix?

While the new Production Orders by Build Capacity is nice, you still have to look at the critical materials one-by-one per production order. We will need a way to get the Critical Materials for ALL jobs.Previous “Solved” community entry: Critical Material Report | CommunityI’ve seen a few suggestions about GI’s in community, but this appears to be a very complicated GI to build - anyone willing to share theirs, that would work for 2025 R2? Thank you!! 

Hi Acumatica Community,Is there a way to restrict the release of a Move transaction if there is no related Material Transaction?The requirement is to ensure that, upon releasing the Move transaction, the system recognizes the materials used in the production.We would like to prevent the Move transaction from being released if no Material Transaction has been created or released for the production.We would appreciate any suggestions or recommendations on how to achieve this requirement in Acumatica.Thank you!

Do the Multiple Production Clock Entry transactions ever fall off the list? Also, is it possible for an employee to use the “Clock Entry” screen and the “Multiple Production Clock Entry Screen” for recording labor? 

25R2 Manufacturers: If you have any non-base UOM Materials called out in In Process Production Orders, take a look at Inventory Allocation Details.  You may find that the system is not recognizing that demand, potentially causing Inventory Planning errors.Any manufacturers out there experiencing this?Development acknowledged it as a bug, but we’re the lone reporters at this point: AC-377609.

Hi all,We're piloting outside processing (subcontracting) in Acumatica for manufacturing and ran into a gap while testing: Vendor Shipments don't seem to be supported in the mobile Pick, Pack & Ship / WMS scanning flow the way Sales Order shipments and PO receipts are.This matters a lot for us because many of our items look very similar to each other, and scanning the barcode to confirm we're shipping the correct item is a critical control for us — doing it manually on the desktop screen increases the risk of picking/shipping the wrong item.Questions for the community:1. Has anyone built a customization to expose the Vendor Shipment screen to the mobile app framework (similar to how Shipments/SO302000 can be exposed for scanning), so it can be scanned like a regular shipment?2. Is there a known ISV product that supports scanning/confirming Vendor Shipments for outside processing in Acumatica specifically?3. Is this on Acumatica's product roadmap for the WMS module?Any pointers, wor

We overproduce on our first operation sometimes. I want to be able to overproduce at that time. However, I do not want to allow for people to be to go crazy or not have the rest of the order qty’s controls in place that make each operation qty’s match.  Example set system to overproduce So, on operation 10 qty to produce was 100They were able to produce 150, and they complete 150 Then on operation 20 because system is set to allow over production, even though there are only 150 to make they complete 180.  I was trying to come up with the best solution so I could overproduce but keep the integrity of the locked system in place. Maybe some kind of buyoff and order adjustment? Operator triggers an over production buyoff, and some corrects the order qty? I don’t want to reinvent the wheel if something already exists.  

We are trying to create Lot/Serial Allocations for a Manufacturing Move Transaction through the Contract-Based REST API.Environment:Acumatica Manufacturing 24.200.xxx Move Entry screen (AM302000) Lot/Serial tracked finished good Custom endpoint exposing MoveEntry and Generate actionScenario:Create a Move Transaction successfully through REST API. The transaction line is created with: Quantity = 2 LotSerialNbr = blank Allocations = empty In the Acumatica UI, the Generate Lot/Serial Numbers button is enabled and works correctly. However, when invoking the Generate action through REST API:POST /entity/{endpoint}/MoveEntry/Generatewe receive:PXActionDisabledException: The Generate button is disabled.Investigation:The Move Transaction is in Balanced status. Hold = false. Quantity exists on the transaction line. Allocations are empty. LotSerialNbr is blank. Generate button is enabled and executable from the UI. The exception occurs only through Contract-Based REST API.Questions:Is creatio

Hello!I am using standard cost as the valuation method for all my items. I have three BOMs, where one final product of the BOM becomes the component of another BOM.The level 2 & 1 refers to the same warehouse, but level 0 refers to another warehouse (Including the material). I want to roll cost for Multi-level, and for level 2&1 it takes the newly calculated standard cost for the next level material cost except for the level 0 as it refers to another warehouse. in another term level 0 material cost always refer to the current standard cost of the item-warehouse. I use same standard cost across all the warehouses. While keeping the above set-up, how should I complete the cost-roll up process? I feel like this cannot be achieved by cost rolling up once at multi-level. Thank You  

I have an item on a Sales Order that we are trying to ship out. I created a move transaction and completed it with no issue but it does not show up in the Allocated qty on the sales order. When I went to go manually allocate this item, I see that the Related Document is still the Production Order itself and not the move transaction and the item does not allocate manually through the Line Details either. How do I go about getting this onto the shipment? We have shipped 4/5 already and are looking to ship the final 1. Line 8 is the line in question.Thank you! 

Is anyone on 26R1, who uses the 24 hour clock vs the 12 hour clock, finding an issue with it not allowing a labor transaction to be under the 24 hour clock vs the 12. I have checked all the local system settings and profile, along with the AM101000 screen setting but its not working as it did in 24R2. My assumption is they are forcing this change or a bug.  

When my purchaser creates a purchase order from a production order it understandably creates a single line on the order for the total amount needed of that item for the production order. Currently our process involves lowering the quantity on that first line and breaking the total quantity out into several lines of that same item so that we can put in different promise dates for each line of the PO. When I or my purchaser go back to the production order details and click PO link, the new line appears but the checkbox to link it is inaccessible. Is there a way to make this accessible?