Recently active topics

Hi all,I am trying to override the ShipmentScheduleSelect data view declared in SOShipmentEntry. This data view has two optional parameters and five required parameters, so in my graph extension I define a data view delegate with 7 parameters of exactly the same types as the data view. As far as I understand, this is all that’s necessary. It shouldn’t be necessary to redefine the data view itself because I am not referring to the data view in the delegate.But I can’t get my delegate invoked. Please see below code snippets of the original data view and my delegate. What am I doing wrong?Thanks,Ben. public PXSelectJoin<SOShipmentPlan, InnerJoin<SOLineSplit, On<SOLineSplit.planID, Equal<SOShipmentPlan.planID>>, InnerJoin<SOLine, On<SOLine.orderType, Equal<SOLineSplit.orderType>, And<SOLine.orderNbr, Equal<SOLineSplit.orderNbr>, And<SOLine.lineNbr, Equal<SOLineSplit.lineNbr>>>>, InnerJoin<InventoryItem, On<Inven

Hi — we’re exploring a 9/80 schedule (every other Friday off) and want to use the “split Friday” approach so each workweek still totals 40 hours. JAMIS Prime runs on Acumatica, and I can’t find a public example of JAMIS clients doing this. Has anyone here implemented 9/80 in JAMIS Prime (which screens they used, e.g., Timesheet Schedule / Time Card Profile / Overtime Rule), or can share a short description of how you configured it? Thank you!

Hello,       Our company has some vendors that we do NOT want the sales team to know about. So we’ve set up restriction groups: only buyers can view these vendors, while certain sales personnel cannot.     However, when sales staff enter sales order with items purchased from these vendors into the system, an error pops up indicating they do not have access rights to the preferred vendors for those items.I currently have a workaround: I don’t set default preferred vendors for these items. But is there a better way to achieve both of the following?The vendors remain restricted (only accessible to buyers); Sales staff can enter sales order with the items correctly without errors.

We have stock items that do not need to be checked into the system in some instances, and others they do need to be checked in. If we raise a purchase order with these stock items, is there a way to not check them in and close off the purchase order?  For additional context, when we were setting up our system, our consultant helped us set up the following manufacturing flow. We have an item that undergoes manufacturing steps at 3 different suppliers. To track the manufacturing flow, we created a BOM with the main part being machined as a stock item and then the subsequent steps are non-stock item services provided to the stock item. I have included a little table below to describe the process. Should I start receiving these goods/not backflushing them?

SO, in this designer report the item line is not picking from the correct path that is SoShipLine.TranDesc. The Soshipline was not in it so i join it to the table of SoShipment. I try adding it but the result was duplicating itself on every linethis was the formual that was puling the item.=IIf([SOPickerListEntry.LotSerialNbr]<>Null, Format('{0} {1} {2}', [SOPickerListEntry.InventoryID], [SOPickerListEntry.LotSerialNbr],[SOPickerListEntry.InventoryID_description]), Format('{0} {1}', [SOPickerListEntry.InventoryID], [SOPickerListEntry.InventoryID_description])) This is after I join SoShipLine to get TranDesc this is the formula i used=IIf(    [SOPickerListEntry.LotSerialNbr]<>Null,    Format(        '{0} {1} {2} {3}',        [SOPickerListEntry.InventoryID],        [SOPickerListEntry.LotSerialNbr],        [SOPickerListEntry.InventoryID_description],        [SOShipLine.TranDesc]    ),    Format(        '{0} {1} {2}',        [SOPickerListEntry.InventoryID],        [SOPickerList

Hi all,We recently upgraded from Acumatica 2024 R1 to 2025 R1 and noticed that whenever a new case is created, an additional activity entry is automatically generated:Type: System MessageSubject: Case created in ERPWe haven’t been able to identify any functional value for this entry—it simply logs that the case was created. However, it is creating extra activity records that are triggering unintended side effects, particularly with Business Events that rely on the CRPMSMEmail DAC (e.g., when monitoring case-related messages).We’ve looked through different settings screens but haven’t found a way to disable this “Case created in ERP” message.Has anyone found a way to disable or suppress this automatic activity entry in 2025 R1?Or alternatively, is there documentation explaining its purpose or how it ties into the case workflow?Thanks,Dave

hello all, i have been trying to clock in on the Project tasks (PM302000) screen, but it still says : the user that i have logged has a linked employee record, have also setup the Default time log type under preferences, the project & the Project tasks both are activated, but still throws this message. is there something I’m missing in here?

Hey, gang - Running into an error and it isn’t clear where it’s coming from.  I’ve got 3 separate deductions that produce this error when I attempt to process liability bills. The corresponding account is NOT associated with an account group, so it’s not obvious why I’d be getting a project error. To make things a bit muddier, I’ve got a similar deduction that affects the tax calculation, uses the same account but DOES NOT result in an error.This is 25R1, so the Require Single Project per Document field is no longer available in AP Preferences. FWIW, the deductions in question are only used for one employee.  Any ideas on where the error is coming from?  Thanks in advance!

HelloWe’re having an issue with Canadian payroll and I’d like to know if anyone else has seen this, or if there is something we’re missing.We have a test employee who has maxed out on EI and CPP (tax reports confirm this), and when I process a subsequent regular pay run and compare the Federal Withholding Tax (FWT) and the Provincial Withholding Tax (PWT) to the Payroll Deductions Online Calculator, the amounts don’t line up. In Acumatica PWT is lower while FWT is higher. If I run the Online Calculator again and do not select the option for max EI and CPP having been reached, then the PWT matches what Acumatica calculates, but FWT is still out. In all standard pay runs I can get an exact match. We’re only seeing this now with maximums having been reached. I’ve gone through all setup and can’t see anything that seems like it would impact this.Appreciate any feedback anyone has on this! 

Hi All, i have just started processing accounts payable payment runs using ABA files exported from MYOB acumatica payables module. The payment batch balances in MYOB, however, when i try to process in CommBiz our own bank details are missing from the ABA file. The bank details of the suppliers we are paying are correct, its just our bank account details that are missing from the ABA file (thus it doesn’t balance and CommBiz won’t process it). We have managed to edit the batch in CommBiz but i would like to fix the issue before it gets to CommBiz. Thanks in advance. 

I’m trying to create a Generic Inquiry table that has all the inventory balance by location and serial number. There’s been several different tables presented on this site that can get qty by location (attached below) however, whenever I add Serial Number to them, the serial number gets attached to everything of the same part, producing duplicate results (and grouping isn’t smart enough to match deal with that). Is there a way to get the serial number to link only to the qty it belongs to?

Hello AllI am trying to create an approval map for expense claims that will require multi user approval.The flows are as below:Aprrovals for $20,000 limit - I have a workgroup assgined to this as it only requires one approver. Approvals for $20,000 - $50,000 limit - there is also a workgroup assigned to this as well as only one approver is required. Approvals greater than $50,000 - this is where the multi user approval is required. There are five (5) users who can approve these claims, however, they require a combination of any pair to approve i.e.: (user 1 and user 2), (user 1 and user 3), (user 1 and user 4), (user 1 and user 5), (user 2 and user 3), (user 2 and user 4), (user 2 and user 5), (user 3 and user 4), (user 3 and user 5), (user 4 and 5) at any time.I’m trying to figure out how I can get this to work. On my approval map, I set up the pairs as various options but that didn’t work as only the first pair was able to have the multi user approval and the rest just approved with

Can we add a fee per package of a shipment? I know we can add a fee for each line of a shipment using shipping terms.However, we want to add a fee per PACKAGE of the shipment.  It is a small fee to cover the costs of the box being used to ship. Is this possible without a customization? Thanks!

Good morning everyone. I am trying to create a new bom with a business event using a GI and an import scenario on a schedule. I am getting the error “The last error was Cannot generate the next number for the BOM sequence.”. To diagnose it easier, I exported the GI to excel and made a data provider, new import scenario, and used import by scenario to upload. i used the community post below to find a solution that worked. This post used option 1 in the below screenshot. It worked fine and created a new bom with the next autonumber with everything correct on it. I then made the change to the business event subscriber import scenario and I got the “cannot generate next number” error. I then tried option 2 below and the business event history shows that it ran successfully with no errors but it didnt actually create the bom. I saw another post where someone could only get the header to get created and had to add materials later so I tried making the GI as simple as possible and use only th

Is it possible to change the transaction description that is automatically generated by intercompany transactions?Currently the transaction description is “Balancing entry for: BRANCH” but the branch is the same branch that the transaction posts to.  It would be more helpful to people reviewing the general ledger transactions to know what branch that the balancing entry was from.  These two descriptions should be swapped to be useful:It is not helpful to see PRODWHOLE has a transaction that is a balancing entry for PRODWHOLE.  It would be more useful to the person reviewing the transaction to know that the branch PRODWHOLE has a balancing entry that came from PRODRETAIL. This issue is sort of related to these:Change the transaction description of invoices created with multiple installment credit terms (Build 2024.2) | CommunityPosting meaningful description for journal entries | CommunityDoes anyone have the code to update the Intercompany transactions? 

Understanding Cost Projections and WIP in Acumatica: What Every Project Team Should Know - Tue, Dec 16, 9:00 AM - 10:00 AM (PST)Cost projections and WIP reporting are two of the most powerful tools in Acumatica’s project accounting. In this session, we’ll walk through how to build accurate projections, how they flow into your WIP report, and where teams typically get stuck. You’ll also see how the new WIP Adjustments option helps clean up variances without manual journal entries.This webinar is ideal for project accountants, controllers, and project managers who want clearer, more consistent project financials, and a deeper understanding of Acumatica’s forecasting and WIP workflows.Presented by Iqra Harrison  | Senior Business Consultant, Protelo Inc. | Acumatica MVPRSVP HERE

Hi, client has several Operation .Is there a way to restrict certain users from entering a Move trx for certain Operations or Workcenters? I tried RowData Security, no option for WorkCenters;  but I tried to use the Warehouse linked to the WorkCenter;  but it did not work. Business Case.  Op worker entering movement for the WC he is working and not a different workcenter.ie,  Assembly vs Packing vs Quality Control.

Hello  Is it possible to populate the Description (Image alt text) field in BigCommerce when uploading images from Acumatica using the Acumatica connector.  Thanks  Matt

I wanted to take a minute to share this with the community. If you have the following feature enabled on Microsoft Edge, it breaks the ability for Acumatica to export to excel ( the little excel buttons on every grid in the system ) if you are using Modern UI. Disable it and you can export to excel again.  

Has anyone developed a system where the move transaction can be done in batches similar to how the materials wizard functions? We release materials when a production order is completed in house so we do the materials and move transaction one right after the other. The materials wizard allows us to release materials for dozens of production orders if needed, but now we need that same functionality but for the move transactions.

Hi everyone,I would like to have a visual on the margin of my transports. Why can't I click on PO linked? I do click on Mark for PO, I add my PO, and it's impossible. Any solutions?Thank you.

Here is the scenarioAllow Preassigning Lot/Serial Numbers flag is flagged in Production Order type screenLot/Serial Class created with assignment method “When Received”Serial number is pre-assigned to the Parent FG : Example SER0001. when the production order was created.FG has 3 sub assemblies..  Assembly 1Assembly 2Assembly 3 When the assembly is produced - the same serial number generated for the parent unit (SER0001) should be reused/assigned for each assembly Item when it it moved. Has anyone come across this scenario? Any thoughts or insights? 

We are a retail business using Acumatica in UK and currently have the Stripe integration switched on and working to accept payments in Acumatica, to do this we can manually type the card details into Acumatica & then the payment detail is sent to Stripe via the OOTB integration to authorise / take payment. We would like to be able to use card terminals within our showrooms so customers can insert their card into the terminal to pay but are struggling to work out what we need to do / what integration is required to allow the payment detail to get to the card terminal, the card terminal sorts the payment and then updates Acumatica when the payment has went through. Is anyone else using Stripe card readers with Acumatica and if so what extra steps / integration are you using to get it working?

We offer installation, removal and storage services to our customers. When we sell a project, the stock item is on the sales order and “Shipped” once it has been installed. We are able to track that inventory up until this point. Then the product gets removed and stored in our warehouse, but we do not have a way of tracking it since it is now customer - owned product and not our own inventory. Does anyone have any suggestions on how to go about this? 

I have two buttons that open the same dialog window. I need to set the visibility of the dialog fields depending on which button is clicked.