Manufacturing

I am looking for a way to add dock-to-stock period into MRP planning (does not need to be part number specific, can be one stock period for all parts) so we get a purchase part in a day or two before our schedule actually shows we need it. Lead time additions will just order the part earlier, not bring it in earlier. Anyone else have a solution to this? I feel like it's right there in front of me, but can’t seem to locate the solution. 

As shown in the screenshot below, we understand that when a Move transaction is performed, the system should create both: The Move Transaction, and The corresponding Cost Transaction. This is not the actual screenshot; it was taken from the local system. In our case, we can only see the yellow-highlighted Move transaction line. The Cost Transaction shown above does not appear in the Production Order. We have identified an issue where, after completing a Move transaction, the Cost Transaction is not being created for that specific Move.As a result, the system generates a

Cannot delete revision nor choose which revision from which to copy to a new revisionIn the product configurator module, I made a new revision (AF) on CFG0000030, but in doing so, I made a sizable error that I cannot easily undo. What I want to do is delete revision AF, go back to revision AE, and have that be the basis for yet another revision for the rest of the edits I need to make. However, the system does not allow me to delete revision AF. I can only inactivate it. If I do this, AF remains the basis for the new revision (call it ‘AG’). Is there anything I can do here?

I’ve done many different import scenarios and regularly make mass changes to our item configurations as we’re preparing for go-live with Acumatica Manufacturing and finalizing how everything will need to be structured. However, I’ve run into this problem that I can’t resolve.We have about 600 configurable items, each with close to 200 lines of options, so making any changes manually is really not an option.Currently, all the configurations are set to revision “0” and are in the pending status, so I can make any needed updates with an import scenario. However, once we are live with this, we’ll need to increment the revision number on all the configurations whenever there is a change, which happens frequently.I’ve attached a screenshot of my update scenario mapping below. The line circled in red is the one that is causing the error. I’m simply trying to take the value from the data provider and increment it by 1. The error that it throws is

Hi Community,I’m looking to get your thoughts on ETO manufacturing and custom-built subassemblies.  Our client does a tremendous amount of Engineer-to-Order manufacturing.  In many cases, their solutions may ultimately be built once, which may also include a reasonably large portion of their subassemblies, such as laser-cut sheet metal parts.  The custom products and subassemblies often fit nicely into a handful of product classes, but in their current state, they are often creating new SKUs for ETO product and subassembly.  These parts are virtually never in inventory beyond the time necessary to issue them to a production order or ship the FG to the customer.  The client will be using CADLink, which will be used to generate SKUs, BOMs, and to update Production Orders. We can continue down this path, which is fine.  With that said, it feels as though there could be some potential benefit of creating skeleton SKUs and BOMs representing generic versions of these product

Hello!I was wondering if anyone had this issue when using this setting on the Production Order Types screen.I turned this on to better track our subassemblies so everything can be categorized under the parent production order #. But what’s weird is that it causes the Production Order # to skip a bunch of iterations, seemingly at random.See below for a screenshot. These were all Production Orders that were created within the last ~5 days. And I am certain that there is no way that someone created around 7000 Production Orders only to delete them in that timeframe.For some reason it jumps from POP027009-000 → POP027746-000 all the way to the most recent which is POP037933-000. And i

Where do you guys download device hub? 

When updating the Safety Stock and other settings on the INVENTORY PLANNING tab of a stock item, the new value carries over to all existing item warehouse details records for the item. Shouldn’t it only carry over to whatever the default warehouse is? It seems undesirable for it to update all warehouse detail records because each warehouse could have its own safety stock. This is on 25R1 25.101.0153.5. I understand that when multiple warehouses are available that the planning settings should be updated on the individual item warehouse details records. However, it becomes confusing for users when there may only be 2 warehouses (one ‘Main’ and a secondary back up warehouse). It’s easier to simply update the safety stock on the stock item and have that setting carry over to the warehouse detail record for the default warehouse, rather than also updating the secondary warehouse. Is this expected behavior?

Here is the scenarioAllow Preassigning Lot/Serial Numbers flag is flagged in Production Order type screenLot/Serial Class created with assignment method “When Received”Serial number is pre-assigned to the Parent FG : Example SER0001. when the production order was created.FG has 3 sub assemblies..  Assembly 1Assembly 2Assembly 3 When the assembly is produced - the same serial number generated for the parent unit (SER0001) should be reused/assigned for each assembly Item when it it moved. Has anyone come across this scenario? Any thoughts or insights? 

Hi All,Acumatica's Production Cycle for a manufactured product consists of 2 major steps: 1) produce volume first and then 2) subsequently, pack the volume into the required SKU.In such a scenario, is there a way to ensure that there is full availability of all materials required for producing a specific volume of a product, prior to confirming a Production Order? If yes, how and where can this be implemented/checked? In other words, a Production Order should not be allowed to proceed further (any subsequent steps) if there is either no or not enough material as required to produce a specific volume of the manufactured product.The same applies to the 2nd part above i.e. to again ensure that all packaging material required is available in full quantity during a request for Packaging Materials. Since this is a separate TR request (Inter Warehouse Transfer), how to ensure that this TR request is tied to the Production Order from step 1 above? The reason being, in o

Hi, client has several Operation .Is there a way to restrict certain users from entering a Move trx for certain Operations or Workcenters? I tried RowData Security, no option for WorkCenters;  but I tried to use the Warehouse linked to the WorkCenter;  but it did not work. Business Case.  Op worker entering movement for the WC he is working and not a different workcenter.ie,  Assembly vs Packing vs Quality Control.

Has anyone developed a system where the move transaction can be done in batches similar to how the materials wizard functions? We release materials when a production order is completed in house so we do the materials and move transaction one right after the other. The materials wizard allows us to release materials for dozens of production orders if needed, but now we need that same functionality but for the move transactions.

This is happening on a client and I cannot find the reason why the generated cost transaction has a different branch to the labour transaction, so it is causing incorrect GL entries.The data is all entered on the correct branch, so any ideas why the system generated cost transaction would have another branch to the source?

I have production orders that span multiple months, but the Qty to Produce is just 1 unit (e.g., large machinery or equipment). Since Acumatica only posts overhead at the time of the final move, all overhead gets booked in a single month — even though the production activity and costs are spread across multiple months.This creates challenges in monthly financial reporting, as it overstates costs in one month and understates them in the others.

I created a new screen that has workflow code on it. i followed the T270 series to make it. I am having issues with disabling an action conditionally. I want the “Remove Hold” button to be disabled whenever a line item is added that has a “Stock Replenishment Type” of “Manufacture” and the Bar ID is null. In the below picture, the removed hold button should be disabled because line 1 and 3 are empty in the bar id. i have the field conditionally required, but it will still put it on hold even though an error will pop up saying that the field has to be filled out. i tried adding it in a row selected event. i also tried to do it in the workflow. but it doesnt ever get disabled. can someone tell me what i am doing wrong?protected void _(Events.RowSelected<ProtoCutLine> e, PXCache cache){    ProtoCutLine row = e.R

Hello Has anyone seen this error? I added Mass Actions to a GI for Production Order Ticket, but when I try to mass edit them or even one, I get this error. I was looking to complete or cancel multiples at once.  

Hi All,We have a client looking at multiple nesting products and at this point they are most interested in SigmaNest.  https://www.sigmanest.com/en Does anyone have any experience with these folks?  Good or Bad?  Thx in advance!

In 2025 R1, we have noticed that the production order type is not copied to child subassemblies.  This worked properly in 2024 R2 and prior versions.  This is what we’re seeing:Generate Order Subassemblies generates subassemblies using the default production order type from the Production Preferences screen Critical Assemblies side panel – The Order Type is read only on Create Production Order pop-up Critical Assemblies stand alone screen – Order type can be changed but doesn’t have any effect.  Regardless of the selection, the child orders use the default production order type from Production Preferences.Any

Hi All. Do you know why I get this error when linking the BOM in Production Order. The Production order was created from SO if that helps, but there were also 2 items in SO that was marked for Production and linking the BOM is fine without error. Can you please help? 

I’ve got a Outside Processing Production Order that uses Purchase Orders to complete one of the steps, however, upon release of the Purchase Receipt, nothing happens. All of them are linked together, however, the qty on the specific line in the production order is unfulfilled. Is there a specific step that I missed that would be causing this issue.The Production Order’s Link to the POThe Purchase OrderPurchase Receipt

I’m trying to produce a PO for a outside process production order, and keep getting the “At Least one item has not been processed” and the PO isn’t created. The trace log doesn’t seem to give any indication of what the error could be or how to solve it. I’ve attached images of the PO and Trace Log for reference. 

Good day,I have production order that has issue with Planned vs. Actual.  The variance is way out of whack.  The cost correct.  The material amounts are all correct.  The Planned is on target.  The issue is the actual.  How could this happen?  The BOM is on point.  We have used it many times in the past.Any suggestions? Or areas to look?See screenshot below.Thank you in advance for your assistance.Evan