Manufacturing

I’m currently testing the ability to find out what lot codes of consumables (like glue, RTV, fujipoly) or serialized parts were used in a serialized product. When I use the As Built Configuration and type in the serial number of the product, I am only shown the details of the parent production order. I’ve set the “Levels to Display” to a higher number than 1, which should have expanded the view to include child production orders, but nothing changed. My company is currently on version 25R1. Would appreciate any assistance getting the As Built Configurator working! Thanks!

We are consistently being reached for declarations and certifications for our products mostly via third party platforms on all regulatory compliance: Prop65, RoHS, REACH, Conflict Minerals, PFAS, POPs, and TSCA. When my searches for Acumatica - Manufacturing capabilities aren’t yielding Construction and Financial compliance I’ve been directed towards the Certifications tab under an inventory item, or directed towards the Quality Management.Looking to further explore the management Acumatica provides and am curious how others may be managing suppler declarations for components and raw material in Acumatica. 

We’re working with BOMs that have multiple operations that all have required materials that are static no matter what configuration options are chosen. When looking at the price rollup options within Configuration Maintenance the available choices are:  Parent: Only the parent stock item is the source of the configured price. (Fixed price) Children All: The selling price is calculated as the rolled-up selling price of each option,  including any fixed materials on the bill of material, times the quantity of each option. Children CFG: The selling price is calculated as the rolled up selling price of each option, excluding any fixed materials on the bill of material, times the quantity of each option. Parent/Children: The selling price is calculated as both Parent and Children All.  We’re selling larger ticket items and prefer to price things as whole numbers. So ideally we’d prefer to set a base price for the parent part number that accounts for the cost/price of the static materi

hello all,I have a BOM which has a non stock item added in one of the ops. Now when I released the production orders, released materials, created Labor & Move transactions there wasnt any mention of the non stock item being used. How can I track these under WIP?

Hello,I have been trying to release the Labor transaction but unable to do so: How to resolve this?

Our client is using Filters on the Inventory Planning Display in 24R2.  While testing for 25R2, I noticed the option to setup filters is gone.  This is a critical piece for our client.  Is there a work around that I am missing?  The client has many users of this screen that need standard filters to review the results.Has anyone else noticed or experienced this issue?

We have 25R2 and when we create a vendor shipment for a Production Order, if material is not in OI-WIP at that time, the material shows 0 on the Material Move of the Production Order once the vendor shipment is confirmed even though we transfer the material from a bin location to OI-WIP prior to confirming the vendor shipment.We now have about 5 vendor shipments that show On Hold, yet the Production Orders are completed.  Material is NOT being taken out of inventory even though the vendor shipment does have the quantities shipped on them.Has anyone else had this issue?  If so, do you know a fix?

Issues is a standard GI for Acumatica.  When a Customer SO is shipped, Acumatica posted the COGS side of the equation.  The customer is known as the customer shipment generates the transaction, therefore one would presume the customer field would populate on the GI.  We are running MRP, so the Prod Order is produced, moved to FG and then shipped from inventory.Am i missing something somewhere?cch 

Our team is currently in the middle of an implementation of Acumatica 2025R1. We have the manufacturing module.  With our existing process, we would make a production order for 100 parts with an outside process operation. We might only have a portion of the parts ready for outside processing, and would make a PO for those parts and send them for outside processing. Later, we may send another portion from the same production order on another purchase order, etc., until all parts have been sent for outside processing. The parts from the earlier PO might return before the other parts, and we would start working on the next operation for those quantities.  Is there a way to achieve this process in Acumatica? We want to be able to track the costs from the purchase orders on the production order and track the quantities sent to the vendor, including how many have been returned and how many are waiting to go.

We create our Production Orders from our Sales Orders.  By default, the system will create the order for the full sales order quantity.Without having to create the Production Order via MRP, Is there a way to: Create the PRO for the shortfall amount automatically in Sales Order, Or be able to adjust the quantity before hitting CREATE.In example below, we have 5 in inventory, so we only need to make 11. 

Is anyone currently using ProNest with Data Sync integrated into Acumatica? If so, I'd be interested in hearing about your experience:How well does the integration work? What data are you exchanging between the systems? Did you use a standard connector, an Acumatica partner, or build the integration yourselves? How difficult was the implementation? Are there any limitations or issues you wish you had known about before starting?We're trying to understand what a typical implementation looks like and what level of effort to expect before moving forward.Thanks in advance for any insights.

Hello,We’ve been live in Acumatica for just over a month now and are running into some questions surrounding the MTO process. In short, inventory has been tied to a sales order as we expect in the MTO process. However, in some cases we’d like to remove the inventory allocation.If we go to the sales order and uncheck the Mark for Production box, that doesn’t seem to be removing the inventory allocated to the sales order. I understand the inventory was probably reserved during the sales order create process.Is there another process we aren’t aware of to remove the inventory allocation link to an existing sales order?

This is happening on a client and I cannot find the reason why the generated cost transaction has a different branch to the labour transaction, so it is causing incorrect GL entries.The data is all entered on the correct branch, so any ideas why the system generated cost transaction would have another branch to the source?

Hello all,I have a scenario where the end user procures fabric rolls in tonnes. The usual width of the roll is 10 meters however sometimes it comes to be around 9 meters or 11 meters. So even if they’re procuring in tonnes, how can we handle the variance in the dimension?Since the fabric is to be used into production, how to account for the same. 

Hello all,How can I create Production order based on MRP. So its like, based on SO, MRP will be generated and then the Production Order will be created. How to do so with MRP?Thanks.

If Use Fixed Manufacturing Time on Inventory Planning Preferences is not checked, we expect MRP to use manufacturing time from the BOM.We are having trouble getting it to take Queue Time into account. DA-L0 and DA-L1 both have a queue time of 4 days.Created an SO for DA-L0 on 3/15. Here is the MRP Result, with the planned action dates for the production orders being 3/15.Shouldn’t the queue time of 4 days force the action date back 4 days?If I create the RO from the SO, it does back up the start date. 

The purpose of the Production Scheduling Whitepaper is to increase the reader’s knowledge of the scheduling processes available within Acumatica. It is strongly recommended to first complete the M100, M200 and M210 manufacturing education courses and be familiar with Acumatica processes and general work center and work calendar configurations. Upon completion of reading this document readers should understand:  Available scheduling methods within Acumatica   How Acumatica determines start and end dates for each scheduling method  What inputs are considered for each scheduling method The following concepts are NOT addressed in detail in this document as they are well covered in either Acumatica’s online help or the M100, M200, or M210 manufacturing education courses.  How to configure work centers   How to configure tools   How to configure machines   For Finite Scheduling, when to run APS Maintenance The following topics were excluded in the first version of this whitepaper but may be

While the new Production Orders by Build Capacity is nice, you still have to look at the critical materials one-by-one per production order. We will need a way to get the Critical Materials for ALL jobs.Previous “Solved” community entry: Critical Material Report | CommunityI’ve seen a few suggestions about GI’s in community, but this appears to be a very complicated GI to build - anyone willing to share theirs, that would work for 2025 R2? Thank you!! 

One of our warehouse locations cannot be used in any production orders. The system says its inactive, and has zero quantity. This is despite the fact that it clearly on in the warehouse tab, has quantity in it, and production consumption is enabled. The parts in this location can even be used in Sales Orders without issue. I’m not seeing any reason why this location wouldn’t be working while everything else is. What could be causing this issue? 

Up until recently our company has solely used production orders for our manufacturing process. We have found that we can use the Kit Assembly process and still have the lot tracking capabilities that we desire. The one thing that we loose out of the box is the ability to track labor associated with the kit assembly and have that labor cost be allocated to the item being created. Has anyone come up with a process for this? 

Hello all,I want to know if tyats a possibility to create inter-unit production processes have 2 sites in Acumatica? Can anyone guide me thru this.Thanks

Hello all,How can we have 2 different valuation methods for an item?So if I am procuring one material and my if I am producing that material, how it holds these 2 separate valuations?And what will be the COGS based on my valuation?Thanks.

Hi All, I am struggling with an import for the configurator maintenance screen. The last topics were years ago and those xml files error when i try them.  Am I right in my understanding that you need to have an import per feature for the options. So for each feature and that features options you would need to have a separate import or is this possible on one import. Any help or examples would be appreciated

Hi all,I’m on 2025R1, using Production Order Maintenance, When I release materials for a Production Order linked to project 9795(Track by Project Quantity and Cost), Material Wizard 2 opens but shows no components, even though the Critical Materials screen shows enough on hand quantity for the production order. Release Material works fine for another project (9299-001- Track by Location). I verified the BOM and warehouse setup. Any ideas why this happens or what setting I might be missing? 

We have an scenario, where a customer they want to consider Project related Stock on MRP demand planning.For example, consider an item with a demand of 100 units and an available stock of 50 units, but this stock is tied to a project layer. The customer expects that any stock on a project layer should be excluded from standard MRP calculations.Additionally, there is another project-specific demand of 70 units for the same item. Since there are already 50 units available on the project layer, the system should only suggest purchasing the remaining 20 units.We understand that this functionality is currently not supported, but is there any plan to incorporate such logic in a future release?