Introducing Acumatica Cloud ERP: 2026R2
Bill of Material. MRP, Production Management, Product Configuration
Recently active
We have an issue where our team processed a production Move transaction for the incorrect qty. and work order closed. Finished goods is now overstated and raw/pack understated. What is the best way to return and deconstruct some of that product to reduce our FG and increase the Raw/Packs?
Does anyone know of a way to generate production tickets from MRP for the total quantities that are in demand for an item. Currently it is showing the same item multiple times and if you generate tickets it will create one by one instead of a sum of the quantity. If we manually sum the qty and create a work order for that quantity, mrp still shows the demand one by one until it’s complete. Quite cumbersome to keep on track. Any suggestions?
We are implementing MRP / Inventory Planning / Production Orders / Bill of Materials in 25R2. I want to exclude certain sales order types from creating demand. I am not seeing anything in inventory planning preferences or in the order types to exclude from demand which was part of the original ask. I do see on certain order types there is the include returns in inventory planning supply. Our use case is the company runs in multiple ways, we have production / manufacturing where we are using Inventory Planning we have those Sales Orders set up as a type where we allow production to be triggered, but we have plenty of other order types that we use in the Construction side of the business to move warehouse materials to site and we do NOT want those orders being included in our demand requirements. Anyone else run into a similar issue? How did you resolve? My inventory ID can be used in BOM’s or Projects. Warehouse locations are able to mark for IP use, but the Sales Order does not
We are having an issue attempting to partially ship an SO line linked to a partially completed production order. Work order/SO quantity is 100, we have 50 complete. Selecting the SO line shows 50 on hand/ available / available for shipping, but none allocated. Line details shows the below, which looks strange from what I recall in the past. This hasn’t been an issue in the past but we recently upgraded to 25.201.0213.2 and this isn’t something we do often so wondering if it is a bug or some obscure setting that now needs to be changed. Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks,Dan
Hello,We are getting an error when trying to approve clock entries, :The clock entry cannot be approved because a labor transaction with the NNN number has already been created for this clock entry.These clock entries are time applied to production orders.I thought that clock entries didn’t go into a batch until they were approved. Is that correct?How can I get past this error?
We have a client that does a lot of custom one off work, and they often reuse the same inventory ID, so they do not have to create 100000 inventory id that they will never use. They are using estimates, so everything gets built out to meet the needs of their customer, but when they go to add it in to the project, it will not allow for duplicates on the project task. They don’t really want to create multiple project tasks, as it duplicates a lot of their work flows. Ideally we would be able to utilize configurations, but configurations and estimates don’t play nicely, especially since there are a lot of outside processes and unknown charges that they need to then flow down.The workaround that they have come up with is to have duplicate inventory ID (remove and replace1, remove and replace 2, etc) so that they can add everything to the project task and group everything together.Not ideal, but better than creating a bazillion part numbers.
Does anyone know why as an Admin I cannot see al the user activates within the company? I am trying to then assign workgroups for department leads to review team activity but step1 - I cannot see them myself. Thanks
When performing a mass multi‑level cost roll, Acumatica doesn't recalculate bill levels for manufactured items from other branches or update their costs in the receiving branch’s assembly. It simply uses the existing standard cost.As a workaround, the mass cost roll process must be run twice. The first run does not pull the most recent standard cost from the sending branch, resulting in an inaccurate assembly cost in the receiving branch. The second run then captures the correct sending‑branch cost and updates the assembly cost appropriately.Can the cost roll process be corrected instead of repeating the mass cost roll process?
Hello all,How can I generate MRP consolidated out of all demands under a single row?
Hello all,The Completed qty is still 0 even after releasing Move transaction:
The Create Production Orders screen is sometimes including sales order lines that already have a linked production order. This seems to occur when the first production order is on an In Process status and has been partially completed. The new production order is for the remaining quantity.This is a big concern in a Make to Order scenario where Create Production Orders is automated. It can lead to over production of costly custom ordered product. We have opened a support case and this has been documented as a bug. In order to prioritize this for development, it would be helpful to identify if others are having this same issue.There is a similar known issue which was documented here and is considered resolved. We are seeing this issue in 2025 R1.Thanks in advance!
Based on testing in 25R2, using Generate Orders for Subassembly pegs the Constraint Date to the Parent Order Start Date (not the individual Operation Start Dates) for the Subassembly orders that are generated.The Due Date is smart enough to look at the Operation Start Date for when the Painted Assembly is actually needed, but Due Date has no impact in the Generate Orders for Subassembly action.We’d like the Constraint Dates for the child orders to be pegged to the OPERATION start date, not the ORDER start date. Is there a configuration we’re missing? We do not use APS.Other areas of the system seem to look at OPERATION start date to determine Constraint Dates/Promise Dates/Demand Dates. I know on the Order Type you can force the MRP system to “Use Order Start Date for MRP”, which pegs all Constraint dates to the ORDER start date, but there is no setting for generating production orders that says “Use Order Start Date [for pegging demand dates]”. This behavior seems inconsistent wit
I’m getting the below error when trying to Close a Production Order: Error: Updating 'Production Item Split' record raised at least one error. Please review the errors.Specify the quantity greater than 0. Which screen/section should I review to find the split line with 0 quantity? What is the recommended fix for old production orders where the split record has 0 qty (update split, clear allocation, add a completion, etc.)?
Hello, group,Long time listener, first time caller… We’re just getting started using the Rough Cut Planning and Production Schedule Board Modules and we’re wondering if there is a way to easily export the Production Schedule Boards. It’s old-school, but while we’re learning the tool, I would like each plant to print the Production Schedule Boards out for their Production Teams to review until we are fully comfortable with the tool and can display on a large monitor. We’re on release 2025 R1. Thanks...
Hello all,I have a scenario, where I would like to manufacture my FG either from Site A or Site B. So based on my Machine availability and MRP planning, I would like to have the option/suggestion from Acumatica as to from where shall I move to Produce my FG, whether it is from Site A or Site B.Is this possible in Acumatica? If so, how? Would be grateful for your guidances and inputs.
We just recently updated to version 2024R2 and since then have found our MRP generation is not consuming the forecasted demand. For instance our forecast for January 2025 has already been consumed by SO that exceed our forecast. However, MRP is planning to the original forecasted demand.
I’m currently testing the ability to find out what lot codes of consumables (like glue, RTV, fujipoly) or serialized parts were used in a serialized product. When I use the As Built Configuration and type in the serial number of the product, I am only shown the details of the parent production order. I’ve set the “Levels to Display” to a higher number than 1, which should have expanded the view to include child production orders, but nothing changed. My company is currently on version 25R1. Would appreciate any assistance getting the As Built Configurator working! Thanks!
We are consistently being reached for declarations and certifications for our products mostly via third party platforms on all regulatory compliance: Prop65, RoHS, REACH, Conflict Minerals, PFAS, POPs, and TSCA. When my searches for Acumatica - Manufacturing capabilities aren’t yielding Construction and Financial compliance I’ve been directed towards the Certifications tab under an inventory item, or directed towards the Quality Management.Looking to further explore the management Acumatica provides and am curious how others may be managing suppler declarations for components and raw material in Acumatica.
We’re working with BOMs that have multiple operations that all have required materials that are static no matter what configuration options are chosen. When looking at the price rollup options within Configuration Maintenance the available choices are: Parent: Only the parent stock item is the source of the configured price. (Fixed price) Children All: The selling price is calculated as the rolled-up selling price of each option, including any fixed materials on the bill of material, times the quantity of each option. Children CFG: The selling price is calculated as the rolled up selling price of each option, excluding any fixed materials on the bill of material, times the quantity of each option. Parent/Children: The selling price is calculated as both Parent and Children All. We’re selling larger ticket items and prefer to price things as whole numbers. So ideally we’d prefer to set a base price for the parent part number that accounts for the cost/price of the static materi
hello all,I have a BOM which has a non stock item added in one of the ops. Now when I released the production orders, released materials, created Labor & Move transactions there wasnt any mention of the non stock item being used. How can I track these under WIP?
Hello,I have been trying to release the Labor transaction but unable to do so: How to resolve this?
Our client is using Filters on the Inventory Planning Display in 24R2. While testing for 25R2, I noticed the option to setup filters is gone. This is a critical piece for our client. Is there a work around that I am missing? The client has many users of this screen that need standard filters to review the results.Has anyone else noticed or experienced this issue?
Issues is a standard GI for Acumatica. When a Customer SO is shipped, Acumatica posted the COGS side of the equation. The customer is known as the customer shipment generates the transaction, therefore one would presume the customer field would populate on the GI. We are running MRP, so the Prod Order is produced, moved to FG and then shipped from inventory.Am i missing something somewhere?cch
Our team is currently in the middle of an implementation of Acumatica 2025R1. We have the manufacturing module. With our existing process, we would make a production order for 100 parts with an outside process operation. We might only have a portion of the parts ready for outside processing, and would make a PO for those parts and send them for outside processing. Later, we may send another portion from the same production order on another purchase order, etc., until all parts have been sent for outside processing. The parts from the earlier PO might return before the other parts, and we would start working on the next operation for those quantities. Is there a way to achieve this process in Acumatica? We want to be able to track the costs from the purchase orders on the production order and track the quantities sent to the vendor, including how many have been returned and how many are waiting to go.
We create our Production Orders from our Sales Orders. By default, the system will create the order for the full sales order quantity.Without having to create the Production Order via MRP, Is there a way to: Create the PRO for the shortfall amount automatically in Sales Order, Or be able to adjust the quantity before hitting CREATE.In example below, we have 5 in inventory, so we only need to make 11.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.