Manufacturing

is there a way to manufacture in seconds and change the operation sequence after you have made the BOM or routing.  example:operation 10 takes 1.5 minutesoperation 20 takes 15.25 minutes etcI only see days hour minutes or hour minutes but no seconds.  thanks in advance 

Has anyone attempted to add a link at the line level to the Work Center Dispatch screen where an shop employee could simply click a blue link and it would preload the Move form with production order type, production order id, and operation id?  Then all the user would need to do is enter the quantity complete and quantity scrapped and release the Move transaction.Even better, if an editable field could be added at the line level for the user to enter quantity complete / quantity scrapped, and then a blue link that would auto-complete the Move in the background.I’m attempting to reduce the level of effort for shop employees (many computer illiterate) to report completed work by making it as simple as possible to complete Moves on on a computer screen.I have attempted to enable Mass Actions - it sort of works, but can only load one record at a time into the Move form.  I also attempted a navigation target with no success there.

Hi,   I have an issue while migrating from 23R1 to 23R2 with the LSSelect.cs  class file which has been removed in the 23R2 below is the code which removed from the  23R2 and it was available in 23R1 public abstract class LSSelect<TLSMaster, TLSDetail, Where> : PXSelect<TLSMaster>, IEqualityComparer<TLSMaster>where TLSMaster : class, IBqlTable, ILSPrimary, new()where TLSDetail : class, IBqlTable, ILSDetail, new()where Where : IBqlWhere, new(){}so, can you please guide me how to resolve the issue in 23R2.

Hello, is there a way to tie or create (new) way to tie materials to a BOM or TOP LEVEL ? we currently have a list of materials but no way of knowing what BOM they are tied to or ‘Where used’  

In our legacy system before we migrated to Acumatica, we could tack warranty expenses relating to a specific production order. I have not found anyway to do this in Acumatica. Currently, we expense any warranty cost to a GL so we can keep track of overall warranty expenses. But, it would be nice to be able to attribute a warranty expense to a production order in some manner other than noting the Production Number or SN in the description or the expense transaction. Has anyone had the same thoughts or found a solution/ISV to solve this problem?

Is it possible to unlink a production order (RO A) from a Sales Order (SO A)? I know I can delete the Production Order but it is already in process and I would rather not disassemble. We decided to reallocate a different Production Order (RO B) of the same item to Sales Order A to get the order out quickly but we can not create a shipment because RO A is not completed yet. Any ideas?

We are trying to hunt down an issue that pops up with a user being unable to clock out.  When you go to clock entry, find the production order, and the user it returns the current clocked in step.  When you click clock out it spins for a sec and doesnt nothing.  When you go to trace it says Cant add data into AmClockTranDac.  However, if the user puts in a qty of 1, it will work.  This seems to happen most frequently to this one user.  I have looked at her employee record and user rights and they are similar to other users in the team.  Any thoughts?

From what I’ve read through on Non-Stock items with Kit Specifications, it is mostly intended for sales orders and purchase order documents, but we have a case where would like to use it within a BOM and production order so that it calls out the underlying items specified and not having to use a kit stock item or full production order to mfg these items.When testing it out, the production detail seems to only call out the kit and not the underlying items with the production order / MRP. Has anyone had success in doing this?  

My client links all sales order to production. Each sales order line has a promise date and ship date. The ship date is the date that production needs to be completed. They are using APS to schedule production which is properly using the ship date as the finish on constraint prior running the scheduling operations.The issue is MRP is still using the ship date as the promise date resulting in a shortage of materials for scheduled production. How do we get MRP to look at the scheduled production to properly identify material requirements?We are on 23R1  - 23.110.0025

There could be a very simple solution to this that I’m not seeing, but basically, I uploaded a forecast on a Finished Good, and MRP is reacting appropriately at the Finished Good level:Action Dates for Finished Good itemFor this Finished Good, I have a corrugated shipper in the BOM, but all of the MRP Planned demand for the shipper fall on the same date:Action Dates for the corrugated shipperI have opened up all calendars and played around with preferences for about 2 hours (fatigue may be my issue at this point), but does anyone know why my Promise Dates would all fall on the same date when the Finished Good demand is spread out? (Lead time for 966414 is set to 14 days). Thanks in advance for any help on this!

Can someone please confirm where we enter our planned labour costs on a BOM?Our original BOMs were set up by a consultant and it was never explained to us where to enter this information. From my searching I think it is ‘run time’ on the work centres on a BOM. Is this correct?If it is, we assume a production order adds all work centre run times together to get the planned labour time on a production order?

Is there currently no way to copy a completed Production Details to a new Bill of Materials? I could export and import, but that seems like an unnecessary hassle. You can copy production details to another production details or save as a template. But I do not see a way to copy Production Details to a new Bill of Materials. You can also reference a previous production order as the “Source” but that does not help with estimating current material and labor cost unless we go through the trouble of creating a plan type production order. For custom jobs, sometimes we have to adjust the production details on the fly and we would like to be able to easily save and copy those details if we need to copy the job.

Cannot mark record as updated because another record with the same key exists in the cache Contact your acumatica support provider Error are getting to call delete method in BOMmaint for deleteing ambomitem.Please suggest some solution for this.?

My company is new to Acumatica, and we are having challenges with the MRP Requirements Screen.   We have over 200 FG skus to plan and we would like to see an aggregate view of Supply vs. Demand.If we use a Bucket ID with a calendar starting today: This screen does not show past due Actual Demand (Customer orders) or Supply (Purchase orders)-then the Ending Quantity goes negative  If we use negative periods to capture the past due Demand and Supply:The screen takes the current OH as  the starting inventory(Begin Qty)  in the past, then we get a different Net Qty and En Qty My experience with other MRP planning screens it to roll the past due open sales orders and past due purchase/production orders) into today’s bucket and calculate ending inventory from today onward.Past dues orders still need to be dealt with via exceptions messages. Time buckets should be in Calander dates and not rolling.  Is anyone else struggling with the functionality of this screen?

Hi Everyone, Is there the ability to consolidate multiple purchase orders for multiple production orders into 1 Purchase order? For example: A client has an Outside process:  10 production orders needing “heat treatment” (an outside process) can be tied to one PO with 10 lines instead of 10 POs each with one line

Hey all!Hope someone has implemented a similar solution to a problem I am struggling with. We are still in the implementation phase of Acumatica at this facility, and at this time my ‘decision makers’ are insisting we use kits rather than a production run due to the way our BOMS are set up.  Parallel to this upgrade, we are implementing a new scale system in one phase of our manufacturing facility. We need to capture 4 fields, the tare weight, the net weight, the gross weight, and the sequential “box number” of that run.  This is a proof of concept for creating end to end transparency and visibility for QC in our tobacco products as they are assembled between 3 companies on 2 tenants.We’ve discussed adding attributes to the kit assembly and using lot/serial numbers but realized that in both the production and kit assembly these are not created until either the assembly of the kit, or the completion of the production run.  Nor are these attributes presented within the webservice endpoin

Hello Community,I have a requirement where one of our prospects have iron bars as their raw materials.They have a scenario where if they are using 10 bars all of 6m in lengths. Now some of these 6m bars might have scratches etc and they would like to record it as a part of scrap. Hence, for these 10 units of bars they would like to record a scrap of around 10%. How can we record such a scenario in Acumatica in BOM.Also would like to know if I would be creating a BOM → Product Configurator, would Production part be required to be covered in such a scenario?Thanks in advance.

Allow non-standards to allow quick and easy data entry from Sales Order to Purchase Order to Production Bom.  Different from Non-Stock.  Non-stock means I have to first setup and/or import into the Non-Stock table before using in a Sales Order, Purchase Order, or Production BOM.  For a non standard to be used on a  Sales Order this would require either the part would have to be a make (requiring a production order), purchase to a sales order or to a Production Order due to being non-inventory.  For a production order, this would allow direct download into the BOM requiring any non standard parts to have to be purchased and/or made (make) via a production order. If I continually use non-stock items, I am having to enter all the parts first as non-stock and then bringing into the production BOM.  Other option is to use one Non-stock part number and update the description to change the BOM parts not exactly the best to calculate and capture costs. The part could only be used one time. Set

Morning All,  My working environment is a machinist shop for the aviation industry.  We use “clock entries” to account for for the machinist time when they are working on production orders.  The process is this a machinist physically has the production order on his person.  They proceed to a scanning station and scan both their id card and production order to acknowledged they are working on the production order and whatever work center was assigned to them.  At this point no other machinist should be able to scan the same production order(physical part) and work on a different work center.    But it happen last week.  Please, see the embedded picture.  How can this be prevented? We are currently using Acumatica 2022 R1.  We will be upgrading in few weeks to next the version of Acumatica.   

Hi – In Acumatica, I can see automated operations features such as Receive and Put Away, however I can’t see Scan Move, Scan Labour, and Scan Materials. My questions are:How do I enable these features? Are there any Acumatica University tutorials on these topics? (I can’t find any) Is there any Acumatica documentation on these topics?

Hi Everyone,Is there a way to do infinite capacity production scheduling? It seems like MRP uses infinite capacity, but we’re struggling to see how we would make this work with scheduling production operations.For example, a client would is wondering if they could have the ability to schedule 10 production orders (work center WC10 and operation 0010) all at the same time block on a given day.Ie. For all 10 production orders, operation 0010 would start (or be scheduled to start) at 9:00am, all in Work Center WC10

Hi everyone, Is anyone able to explain the reasoning for why after Rought Cut Planning is processed, that the system is slotting in AM0000037 in between 2 blocks of AM000002. I would expect the system to block of 2 “30 minute” blocks to complete operation ID 0010 for AM000002 entirely before starting another Production Order. If i update the crew size to 2, in the WC10, it of course completes the entire operation in 1 block.We are trying to understand what system logic, system preferences are causing the AM0000037 Production order to be slotted in-between.  

We have a customer who would like to store/pre-populate specific serial numbers in the sales order line/line details table. These items are items to be manufactured and have not had production order created or finished, so the actual serial numbers are not in stock.Has anyone come up with a workaround to pre-populate the serial numbers (or lot numbers) in SO Line Details?Regardless of testing all types of lot/serial classes, requiring lot/serial numbers on the order types, and changing item class to allow negative quantities, I can not get past the Inventory quantity will go negative error once I try to prepopulate a user enterable serial number in line details. I enter the serial and then when I tab off it clears the serial number and presents the error message.  

Hello,When I run MRP, it successfully shows demand for component parts for a specific BOM when the demand is for a production order.When I put in a forecast for the upper level part (The BOM part) MRP shows the forecast demand ONLY for the upper level part, not for for the components used on the BOM.Any thoughts why the forecast demand would not be blowing down to the materials on the BOM and MRP suggesting POs for the parts?Thanks!Larry

Hello,We are encountering this issue when releasing a Labor. The production orders are set to backflush, and the Labor is for the last operation. The Labor status remains on balanced - we noticed that the corresponding IN Receipts and backflushed Materials/Cost Transactions have been generated and released.I have checked the 2 known issues for manufacturing demand plan ID issues, it is not a negative move or transfer receipt. We are currently on Build 22.120.0019.Any ideas?