Distribution

Environment: Acumatica 2025 R1, Distribution edition with Advanced Kitting (Acumatica Labs Program). We’ve been live since July 1, 2026 so we're still new to Acumatica.Before realizing there was a Bill Separately checkbox, a consolidated invoice was created for a customer covering many sales orders in July. Because each SO has its own PO, the customer requires separate invoices. Normally this would not be a big deal to cancel and recreate separate invoices, but in this case every line on those orders was a non-stock digital item that doesn't require physical shipment. Attempting to Cancel or Correct the invoice generates the error:"The invoice ###### cannot be canceled because it includes line or lines linked to an order that does not require shipping."(This thread confirms the same constraint for Correct Invoice, but with no remedy: unable-to-correct-invoice-25053) With both actions unavailable, in August I created a credit memo manually in AR301000 for the full amount, released it, a

We have process request to create a spit shipment (new shipment confirmation) from the shipment confirmation lines when needed.  Is this possible?

We recently upgraded to 2026 R1 and started seeing an issue with credit card pre-authorizations.When a pre-authorization fails, Acumatica still marks the Prepayment Requirement as Satisfied, which allows the order to move forward to shipping.Before the upgrade, failed pre-auth orders stayed in Awaiting Payment status and did not proceed to shipment.We use REPAY, and they confirmed that this appears to be an Acumatica issue.Has anyone experienced this after upgrading to 2026 R1?

I'm facing an issue with Acumatica 2026 R1 (Build 26.100.0175) while implementing hyperlink navigation in a custom Modern UI screen.ScenarioI have a custom screen generated using the Modern UI Generator. The OrderNbr column is displayed as a hyperlink using @linkCommand. @linkCommand("OrderSO")@columnConfig({    width: 250})OrderNbr: PXFieldState<PXFieldOptions.CommitChanges>; public PXAction<TSSOHistoricalData> OrderSO;[PXButton(CommitChanges = true)][PXUIField(DisplayName = "Order SO",    MapEnableRights = PXCacheRights.Select,    MapViewRights = PXCacheRights.Select,    Visible = false)]protected virtual IEnumerable orderSO(PXAdapter adapter){    Dictionary<string, string> parameters = new Dictionary<string, string>    {        { "OrderNbr", DetailsView.Current.OrderNbr }    };    throw new PXRedirectToGIRequiredException("OrderSOGITest", parameters)    {        Mode = PXBaseRedirectException.WindowMode.Layer    };}works fine in Classic UI facing issue in Mod

Good Day.  I am trying to import multiple Purchase Orders with multiple lines.  The creation of the Purchase Order should use the GL setup as is on the Item record.  This just doesn’t want to work 

Hello,I was wondering if anyone knows if there is a resolution for this issue:The following error appears when attempting to create a shipment for an order for which the Sched. Shipment date is greater than the current date.This would be considered a bug to us, as there is no reason you should be prevented from shipping an order earlier than requested.This is a required field that is pre-populated from the SO Requested On field, and results in an additional unnecessary and confusing step of manually altering the scheduled shipment date to the current day before creating the shipment.We are shipping non-stock items, back order allowed, allow negative quantity, but that should not matter.I know this was previously a known issue but we are using 2023 R1 where it was supposedly resolved years ago  TYVM!Kyle

All of my Sales Orders in the Details tab show <SPLIT> in the Sched. Shipment Date and are empty when checking Line Details. The Sales Order has a Sched. Shipment date entered in the Shipping tab and the Purchase Order has Promised On date entered. I’m trying to understand why they are always showing <SPLIT> instead of the dates provided?

Dear ALL,I performed Wave Picking exactly as shown in the YouTube tutorial However, when scanning the Pick List on the "Pick, Pack, and Ship" screen, the system displays the error: "The 000006/1 shipment is not found."    Is there an additional step I need to complete beforehand? Please advise.Best Regards,NNT

We have a situation where we agree to credit and refund a customer for a faulty item but we don’t ask for the item back.For reporting purposes we want to process this through sales orders rather than in AR as we want to track the stock items, quantities & values of these.Is there a way to process such a return that does not generate a stock receipt transaction ? Does anyone else have this kind of process to deal with and if so how do you handle it ?Many thanks !

Since upgrading to 2025 R1 (build 25.201.0213.2), 0VPN cross-reference entries no longer resolve on transfer receipts in Receive and Put Away. Standard PO receipts work fine. Typing the inventory ID directly works, and adding a BARCODE cross-reference also works, so it appears the transfer receipt path is filtering out 0VPN as a valid lookup type.This worked before the upgrade. Has anyone else seen this or is there a known fix?

We have a very large product count (400k+ SKUs) and are looking to launch our Shopify store on Shopify Plus very soon. Shopify has given us increased API capacity for 30 days, but now I'm getting the following error when trying to sync:Adding the specified count to the semaphore would cause it to exceed its maximum count.Has anyone run into this? Any guidance appreciated.  

In Acumatica 24R1 through 25R2, I have experienced an issue of the Shipstation “Age” being off by up to 23hrs. This seems to be the “expected” behavior according to Shipstation. Has anyone else experienced this issue? If so, any work arounds? 

Once cross-sell suggestions have been generated and then approved on the Manage Cross-Sell Suggestion form, is there a way to un-approve this suggestion.  The related item can be deleted from the Stock Items Related Items tab, but would be helpful if there was a way to do this on a process screen instead of individually.

Any other Amazon sellers still experiencing this? Seems to be no solution from Acumatica in sight 

Vendor already exists on the items and we are looking to change the vendor to the default (already marked default on a different vendor) using an import scenario. Searched and tried several different options. Was getting the purchasing unit error, added that and then getting a duplication error. Tried a manual scenario and still no luck. Hoping someone has a GI written for this same scenario. Thank you!

As a commercial importer of lighting products from all over the world, we also distribute in all of North America. In the past uploading Price lists and modifying our prices was once or twice a year during the beginning of the year. We only used to upload current inventory or requested inventory items into Acumatica. This was a 6 transaction event for each product due to currencies, landing factors, shipping and duties. However as we have grown we need to upload all our vendor price lists. This did not seem to be an issue: until the world changed this January and pricing needs to be updated monthly.  I cannot express the frustration of having to update prices and as a result  we are being choked and asked to upgrade to large enterprise level “no Limits” licenses.We are a small/medium size business and ave spent over 500k getting Acumatica to work for our business. I want to see if others are having the same issue, there should be allowed a scheduled server downtime to upload, update or

Hi Everyone,I have 2 tenants for the same instance and they want to merge into one tenant. same inventory items in both tenants, however due to it being separate locations, they use different base UOM’s. Does anyone have thoughts or ideas on how to handle this? My thought is that the one location will have to conform or do UOM conversions. 

Dear ALL,I am currently researching the appropriate hardware for using the Pick, Pack, and Ship functionality in Acumatica for warehouse management (WMS).I would like to ask the Acumatica Community for recommendations regarding the barcode scanning devices that are most suitable for this purpose.Specifically:Which barcode scanning devices or handheld mobile computers does Acumatica recommend for Pick, Pack, and Ship? Are there any specific brands and models that are officially supported, recommended, or commonly used with Acumatica WMS? For a warehouse environment where warehouse workers need to walk around and continuously scan items, locations, shipments, boxes, totes, etc., would you recommend a rugged handheld device with a physical scan trigger/pistol grip rather than a standard smartphone-style mobile device? Are devices from Zebra, Honeywell, or Datalogic commonly used with Acumatica WMS? If so, which models have you successfully used? Does Acumatica have any hardware compatibil

Very Cool new surprise for 2021 R1.  Dead Stock inquiry screen lets you see non moving inventory. Here’s a quick video.  https://youtu.be/vkh6yhUK1qA 

Topic: Measuring LTL Rate Quote Accuracy Between Customer Charges and Actual Freight CostsWe are currently evaluating the accuracy of LTL rates quoted during Sales Order entry in Acumatica compared with the final freight cost incurred when the shipment is processed. We use ShipHawk TMS for the rate shopping and freight cost. The customer is quoted and charged based on the rate shop within Acumatica/ShipHawk integration prior to shipping. Then the actual freight charge is saved in a data field on the shipment after booking within TMS. NO updates are made to customer charge/billing. Our initial target was for the customer freight charge and actual shipping cost to be within 5% of each other. However, we are encountering some challenges:Customer Service does not always quote the same carrier or service that the warehouse ultimately selects. Smart Pack does not account for void and occasionally “packs” multiple pallets when rating.  Even when the quoted and shipped services match, we are s

 I want to ask, is it true that the “Available for Shipping” can be negative ?  

In the past few weeks we’ve had two different users report the same issue.  Of course, we can’t duplicate it.They are reporting that, when they have a sales order with lines marked for PO, and they create the purchase order using the “Create Purchase Order” option/screen, the Vendor location selected for the items is not always the default vendor location for that item.  When it’s not, the system seems to randomly choose a vendor location, sometimes locations that aren’t even set as the default location for any product.Since we can’t reproduce this, I’m leaning toward user error, but I’m curious if anyone else has experienced it.

Update Stock Item Attributes When Last Cost Is ChangedI need help creating a Business Event / automation in Acumatica for the following requirement.RequirementWhen the Last Cost of a Stock Item is updated from:Stock Items → Price/Cost tab → Last CostI want to automatically update two attributes in the Stock Item → Attributes tab:Attribute ID Attribute Value ILANDEDCST Cost Landed Cost IMARGIN Cost Margin The values for these attributes are currently available through a Generic Inquiry.Expected Process User updates Last Cost on the Stock Item. The Business Event should detect that the Last Cost has changed. The Business Event should trigger an Import Scenario. The Import Scenario should update the corresponding attributes on the Stock Item: Attribute ILANDEDCST Attribute IMARGIN The updated values should then be visible in the Stock Item → Attributes tab. IssueI have already created the Generic Inquiry and Import Scenario, but I am having difficulty getting the

I have enough stock item to adjust but after releasing it show the error message about

Hello all,Recently while implementing Punchout feature for Acumatica for a customer, the users showed us how they utilize the replenishment functionality to create multiple orders for different vendors.While designing the Acumatica feature we focussed only on the Vendor site connection and bringing CART back into Acumatica and create either Requisition or a PO for approval and then sending order directly to Vendor.Now this replenishment order creation caused us delay in our implementation. So the question is how many of you actually use this feature to create orders. If you use “PUNCH OUT” feature how useful this feature to you to place orders directly from replenishment to approved Vendors?  We would like to hear this from the users who are heavily purchasing and have to either entry in Acumatica and then the vendor order site or sending the PO to their order system via email. We appreciate your feedback as this helps us plan and address this issue better. Thank youVivek Vemunoorivive