Discussion Forums

What is the process for marking an attribute as required

Hello everyone,I've encountered an issue concerning how item descriptions are handled between the Stock Item  master and its usage within the Bill of Material module.When I update the Description of a standard Stock Item (e.g., on the Stock Items (IN202500) screen), this change is not automatically inherited by the corresponding component line item within any existing BOM. I must manually open and update the BOM to reflect the new description.Why is this the intended behavior in Acumatica? From a data consistency and efficiency standpoint, it seems logical that the BOM component's description would always reference or automatically update from its master Stock Item record.Could someone explain the design philosophy behind this apparent lack of synchronization? I'm trying to understand why this would be implemented as a feature to be managed manually, rather than an automatic system update. Is there a specific business scenario this design supports?Any insight into the technical or func

Hi all,We’re running Acumatica 2025 R1 with the US ACH plug-in and have run into a limitation related to the Class Code (CCD vs PPD).Currently, the plug-in doesn’t appear to allow us to define the Class Code at the vendor level, which is an issue since we make ACH payments to both businesses (CCD) and individuals (PPD).Our bank supports having both CCD and PPD records within a single NACHA file, as long as each group of transactions is properly batched by class code.We’ve considered setting up two separate ACH payment methods (one for CCD and one for PPD), but our accounting team would prefer to process all ACH payments in a single batch.Has anyone found a way to handle mixed CCD/PPD transactions in one batch, or implemented a customization that allows the Class Code to be set at the vendor or payment level?Any creative workarounds or examples would be appreciated.Thanks,Dave

Is there a way to upload a bunch of old emails into Acumatica all at once? We have a bunch of old emails we would like logged in Acumatica, but we don’t see an option to upload them all at once.

I’m trying to update a customization for Modern UI. I’ve done the same on several other screens without problem, but can’t seem to make Customer Locations work.I’m getting the dreaded “cannot be bound to a FieldState.” but the fields are in the DAC Extension. They show up fine in GIs (which is generally my test.)Can  anyone see what I’m doing wrong?TS File:import { PXFieldState, PXFieldOptions, createCollection, PXView, gridConfig, GridPreset  } from "client-controls";import { Location } from "../AR303020";export interface LocationExtTest extends Location {}export class LocationExtTest {    UsrTEKServiceTradeSend: PXFieldState;    UsrTEKServiceTradeManualID: PXFieldState<PXFieldOptions.CommitChanges>;    UsrTEKServiceTradeID: PXFieldState;    }HTML File:<template>    <qp-tab after="#tabGeneral" id="tab-STInfo" caption="ServiceTrade"  load-on-demand="true">        <qp-template id="formSTGeneral" name="1-1" class="label-size-m">            <div slot="A">    

Hi.I need to create a GI that should calculate values ​​the same way as in a rowset. How i can do this? 

I have BAccountExt with this field (Its first customization):#region UsrCostCodeID        public abstract class usrCostCodeID : PX.Data.BQL.BqlInt.Field<usrCostCodeID> { }        [EPTimeTrackerCostCodeSelector(typeof(BAccount.bAccountID))]        public virtual int? UsrCostCodeID { get; set; }        #endregionAnd i have RQRequisitionLineExt with this field (Its second customization):#region UsrCostCodeID        public abstract class usrCostCodeID : PX.Data.BQL.BqlInt.Field<usrCostCodeID> { }        [PXDefault(PersistingCheck = PXPersistingCheck.Nothing)]        [CostCode(typeof(Current<RQRequisitionLine.expenseAcctID>), typeof(usrProjectTaskID))]        [PXUIField(DisplayName = Messages.CostCode, Enabled = true, FieldClass = "COSTCODE")]        public virtual int? UsrCostCodeID { get; set; }        #endregionWhen i on this two customizations. In Requisitions Primary List RQ3020PL i have this error

I need help adding lot numbers to the shipment detail line. The order is created by an external source. Once we receive notification that the order was shipped the shipping detail and lot numbers are retrieved by an API. My process creates the shipment and shipment lines. For each shipment line I must add lot numbers. There can be 2 or more lot numbers per shipment line. What is the protocol for adding the lot numbers to the shipment lines?

Hi all! I’m trying to create a report using GI that shows all landed costs and the POs they are related to. The problem is that I’m getting a lot of blank lines.I’m using these data sources:PoReceiptPoReceiptlineLandedCostDetailsPoorderLandedCostDoc

Hii, i wan to ask, why i can not to create a new budget in Acumatica? There is any step that i miss before cerate a budget in Finance Module. and also can we compile grant/project budget and department/program budget on this budget menu, so we can get the calculation between grant budget and department budget in this Budget Finance Modul?Please help me to solve about this, i really appreciate😥 

Hii, i want to Activate my Fixed Asset by “Remove Hold”, but when i tray to save the Fixed Asset, there is an error. So i can not to release the Fixed Asset Transactions and the other procedure for Fixed asset. Please help me to solve about this, the COA is already active, i created the new dummy subaccount (T02-000) and also i already check the fixed asset class for this and confirmed if their already have the same setting for GL Account. I really confuse, there’s a step that i miss, so i can not to Activate and Release the transactions.Thank you  

An unhandled exception has occurred in the function 'MoveNext'. Please see the trace log for more details.We got the above error for couple of time for a customer in this month. This error got resolved after we did restart. Is this an known issue?

Hi all, I’ve set up a business event and mobile push notification in MYOB Acumatica, but the mobile push notification isn’t working and is showing the following message. Does anyone know what might be causing this issue?   

Looking for some guidance on modifying an email template “To” field to be the Contact selected at the Sales Order header.  Tried to plug in various fields to no success.  Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

Hi Team,We need to create a new QR code in a report, which, when scanned, should display multiple fields and images with labels.Kindly assist us with how we can achieve this. Regards,Sagar Gadge

Hello,Ever since upgrading to the 2024R2 version, the credit memos created when we make a Pro Forma invoice correction are released automatically, without going through the approval map process. We did not have the issue before and the approval map did not change. Can you help me out with this please? Thanks for your help,Ariann 

Hi everyone, I need some help with an issue related to address and contact information. They have somehow turned into different characters. Additionally, when I tried to publish a customization to another instance, the same issue occurred. Even after unpublishing all customizations, I can't revert it. All the Customers address, and contacts became like this.Does anyone have any idea what's happening? Thanks! 

Hi all — I’m looking for a GI pattern to display weekly totals of specific day fields from EPTimeCardSummary (e.g., Sun, Mon, …) only when IsBillable = true, including combos like Sun+Sat or Sun..Mon — but without using Group By on the main grid (I need to keep row-level detail intact). Available fields: EPTimeCardSummary.IsBillable (bool/bit) and EPTimeCardSummary.Sun..Sat. What’s the recommended approach to surface these weekly billable totals on an ungrouped grid (e.g., self-join to a grouped alias, other best practices), and any example expressions you can share? Thanks!

I know of two ways to accomplish this:Enable SyncPosition on the grid which will trigger the RowSelected event in the graph Use the TypeScript CurrentRowChanged eventHere’s the problem: all the examples in the docs are for base screens, not customizations. I need to do this for an existing grid without SyncPosition enabled.I tried defining it in an extension of the original class:@gridConfig({ syncPosition: true})export class DXCostBudgetExt extends CostBudget {This didn’t seem to change anything. I also tried to write a TypeScript event handler for CurrentRowChanged, but again, the docs only specify how to do this with the base class, not an extension class. I tried several variations of this, and nothing seems to work:@handleEvent(CustomEventType.CurrentRowChanged, { view: "CostBudget" })onCostBudgetLineChanged(args: CurrentRowChangedHandlerArgs<PXViewCollection>) { const ar = args.viewModel.activeRow as DXCostBudgetExt; //const model = (<any>args.viewModel as Co

What would be better structure when using the configurator in Acumatica:1.- Have a base unit “configurable part number” with multiple options.2.- Create a blank part number “model” and everything else, “base unit” + options setup as selectable options?

Is there a way to combine multiple lines of a Sales Orders into a single entry? I thought it might be possible to have multiple joins with SO Line Nbr being the criteria for each one, but I can’t seem to figure a way to have a number be a join criteria. Is there a way to do this?

I’ve noticed that if I save an AR invoice where I entered a subaccount manually and then change the salesperson, the system replaces the subaccount I had entered manually. Is this a normal behavior?

Trying to preform a lookup in an import scenario and have it update the line that matches the SoftwareID on the BAccount. BUT instead of it creating a new line if the lookup doesn’t generate a match, I want it to do nothing and skip it. How does one bypass this functionality of it creating the new line?   

Hello, I am getting an error when trying to create a purchase order from my Production Order. The Purchase order contains two non-stock items and upon “Processing” the Purchase Order I get two errors, one for each item, and the PO is never created. This only appears to be issues with Non-Stock items. Thoughts?

Is there a setting or other method to restrict item purchasing ONLY to vendors listed for an item AND marked as “active”? I’d like to be able to turn on/off the ability to use a vendor for specific parts. In this instance, we are creating the POs manually, not via automation. Currently, I can create a PO for any part and any vendor, which has led to some mistakes. Ideas?