Discussion Forums

Hello:We’re looking at the feasibility of converting to modern UI in production when it leaves the Beta.I’ve ran into several interesting things, but one that feels concerning in the long run.  It is common in our custom code to have DAC’s with properties decorated as the following example: [PXFormula(typeof(Selector<MyCustomClass.vendorID, Vendor.acctName>))]In classic UI, these formulas are calculated correctly as soon as the DAC is exantlated (as expected?).However, in modern UI, the above PXFormula is never calculated (verified with a break point put on an explicit setter).  This was a bit of a surprise as we were tending to approach the UI as being two different display layers - ‘views’ - built on top of the underlying model and controller.  Is this a bug?​​​​ If not a bug is the construction we are using deprecated or invalid and only working unintentionally? is there a property in the PXFormula that would make this work? If not can you suggest an alternative approach?We se

​Hello everyone,I’m having the following problem: I’m trying to convert a Classic UI screen into Modern UI and 3 of the buttons are not getting hidden for some reason but there’s a try that my colleague tried doing a while ago and the buttons are working as expected there but I’m unable to recreate them for some reason using the automatically converted screen into Modern UI. The buttons I’m having that issue are “Confirm, Generate and Change Order” also another thing I noticed is that we cant reuse the Transactions variable because if we do, the Subcontracts grid is not being automatically loaded on page refresh or load.The version of Acumatica I’m working with is 2025 R2. Here’s the automatically generated source code: I’ll have to paste the source code into pastebin since the source code is a bit too long and the post cannot be createdthe HTML filethe TS file that contains the viewinfoand the actual views TS file now the files from my colleague:The HTML filethe TS file Now the C# cod

We are having an issue attempting to partially ship an SO line linked to a partially completed production order.  Work order/SO quantity is 100, we have 50 complete.  Selecting the SO line shows 50 on hand/ available / available for shipping, but none allocated.  Line details shows the below, which looks strange from what I recall in the past.  This hasn’t been an issue in the past but we recently upgraded to 25.201.0213.2 and this isn’t something we do often so wondering if it is a bug or some obscure setting that now needs to be changed.  Any guidance would be appreciated.  Thanks,Dan

I got a couple issues with the Shopify Connector, specifically the customer location sync.At random it will create more than one location for the customer in Acumatica.  It will activate one and deactivate the other.  Since upgrading to 2025R2 we have every day one or two orders where it will fail to import due to "property set method not found". What we found is that it means that the location is not active. When you go to it in Acumatica, you cannot activate it either. You need to create an additional location, make that the default, then you can go back to the other location and activate it.  In addition I found today that when I look at audit history for any customer, it will show me a bunch of location changes for different customers, different random locations. I don't know what these mean and why they're showing up on another customer that's not even connected to our Shopify store.   

Hi, In GST Pending Recognition report below, there is an Unrecognized Tax Total. This is a standard report in Acumatica.How do I get the 2 headers  (Taxable Amt and Tax Amt) total just like how Unrecognized Tax Total is? Based on the screenshot below, it totals per Tax ID (i.e., G1SALESINCGST).I’ve tried using formulas such as =Sum(Max([SVATConversionHistExt.TaxAmt])) but that doesn’t work. It gives me wrong totals. I’ve tried variables too - doesn’t work either.  

Hello,We are getting an error when trying to approve clock entries, :The clock entry cannot be approved because a labor transaction with the NNN number has already been created for this clock entry.These clock entries are time applied to production orders.I thought that clock entries didn’t go into a batch until they were approved. Is that correct?How can I get past this error?

Hi, I am trying to import AP bills. The AP Bills are tied to a PO Receipt. As well as the vendor, I have the PO number & PO Receipt Line number. I am having an issue with trying to select the Add PO Receipt Line in the Scenario. The Document is being created but nothing else is happening.(If in migration mode, you cannot use the Add PO Receipt button) Does anyone have any solutions/ideas for getting this to work?Thank you in advance!Bill 

Hello everyone! Acumatica Project&Construction team is planning to implement a new functionality - Prepayment for projects. I saw it was discussed and requested on the community several times:Prepayments to show on a project | CommunityConstruction Customer Prepayment | Community Could you please share with me how do you need to recognize the taxes for AR deposit on project? and when do you need recognize taxes? What is your setup for taxes for deposit on project? Could you please describe your business case when you need deposit on project? How do you request deposit for project? How do you process deposit got for project?  What is important for you when you work with prepayments on project?Thank you in advance for your answers!Have a good day!

Below is the import scenario I am trying to use to get our fixed assets into Acumatica.  When I run the import by scenario, it shows that the records processed, but nothing appears in the fixed assets form. 

In my case, I’m customizing SO301000 and enabling the import button on the Detail grid with the following:@gridConfig({ actionsConfig: { import: {hidden: false}, }})But, this seems to replace the settings that the base screen is using including: syncPosition: trueHow to I merge my configuration instead of replacing the existing gridConfig settings?

25R2 Manufacturers: If you have any non-base UOM Materials called out in In Process Production Orders, take a look at Inventory Allocation Details.  You may find that the system is not recognizing that demand, potentially causing Inventory Planning errors.Any manufacturers out there experiencing this?Development acknowledged it as a bug, but we’re the lone reporters at this point: AC-377609.

I'm looking for a way to manage a tenant's configuration as code — declarative files in a git repo I can review in a pull request, version, and re-apply to rebuild a tenant reproducibly.By "configuration" I mean setup data, not customization code: enabled features, company/branch structure, chart of accounts, ledgers, GL preferences, currencies, credit terms, financial calendars, and the like.The workflow I want is basically infrastructure-as-code — capture a tenant's setup into source files, edit them in git, apply to another tenant, then diff to catch drift.Customization Projects cover code but not this setup data. Snapshots are reproducible but are whole-database blobs — not human-readable or diffable in a PR. The REST API can push data, but it's a building block, not a desired-state workflow.Is there an existing tool or established pattern for this — a community tool, an ISV product, or something people have built in-house? Curious how others handle it.Thanks!

Hello,I am currently working on the integration between Acumatica and Microsoft Teams, and I would like to know how to configure a Business Event to automatically mention a specific user or group in Teams. The goal is for the notification to appear in a Teams channel with the the specific user or groups being tagged (e.g., @username), for example the new owner of a Ticket.Is there a way to set this up using the native Teams integration in Acumatica? If so, could you provide the steps or any relevant examples?Thank you for your help!

My FA team report the different about sub account of Credit Memo and Oriinal Invoice.they using Invoice Correction to generate that Memo. i have  try to identify, and i found that subaccount for the Memo same with  SO Subaccount  for the Original invoice.Is there any configuration that needs to be done so that the Credit memo subaccount is the same as the Original Invoice subaccount? thanks for helping me.

Please confirm - when using a Trigger by Schedule you can NOT select screen by shared filter as you can By Record Change ???   

I’m trying to programatically created Sales Shipments: given a despatch message from the third-party warehouse, I locate the sales order and then use CreateShipmentIssue to construct the shipment.This works fine when I run the action as a user. But fails every time when running as a Process via the automation scheduler.My code simplifies to:orderGraph.Clear();orderGraph.Document.Current = PXSelect<SOOrder,Where<SOOrder.orderNbr,Equal<Required<SOOrder.orderNbr>>>>.Select(orderGraph, orderNbr);PXAdapter adapter = new PXAdapter(PXView.Dummy.For<SOOrder>(orderGraph)) { AllowRedirect = false, MassProcess = false };var orders = orderGraph.CreateShipmentIssue(adapter, receivedItem.ShippedDate, siteID, DateTime.UtcNow);The error is:PX.Data.PXRowPersistingException: Error: 'CuryID' cannot be empty.   at PX.Data.PXDefaultAttribute.RowPersisting(PXCache sender, PXRowPersistingEventArgs e)   at PX.Data.PXCache.AttributeHandlersSquasher`1.<>c__DisplayClass2_0`1.&

hello,I am using Resource owner password flow to get Acumatica token.I am encountering an intermittent issue across all environments, including Production.When we receive an application for processing, we call the Acumatica Get Customer endpoint using a valid authentication token. Occasionally (approximately once a day or every other day), the request fails because the response cannot be deserialized. Our application expects a JSON response, but instead receives an HTML page, as shown below. We cache the authentication token and validate it each time it is retrieved from the cache. Token validation is based on the Date header returned in the token generation response to ensure the token has not expired. Could you help us determine why the API is intermittently returning HTML instead of the expected JSON response, despite the token being valid?Tokens:return html response : LqGoqJP-MvG2Q44kKI_QEq0PqziBlrWXnInucaZS9w0return Json (Valid): IPLN2zlT8ui3GzGoySRC2M5nyz0Xa-StJ3cup25MAncif (resp

Hi,I’m getting an error on my import scenario to import purchase orders. It will import the first order but then I get the error ‘The system failed to commit the transaction row. Any help would be greatly appreciated 

In Report Designer or Generic Inquiries, we can specify which values to include or exclude. Is there a similar feature available in Report Definitions? For example, I'd like to include accounts 100 and 500 while excluding account 200. 

I’m at a lost keep getting a “Failed to Commit to Adjustment Row” XML attached. The intermediate save is not the issue. 

Is it possible to prepare an existing binary snapshot already prepared for export in XML using “Prepare in XML format”?If this is possible, would I need to put the tenant in maintenance mode to do so?I exported a binary snapshot to import via the setup wizard and also to save as much space as possible but I forgot that it had to be in XML format for that method of import to work. 

Here’s my scenario: on Acumatica 26.100.0175.3, I have an environment with two tenants, let’s call them Tenant A and Tenant B. Tenant B is configured as a Test Tenant.I have a simple customization project that includes both custom fields to extend existing DACs (in this case, the CR.BAccount, SO.SOOrder and SO.SOLine DACs), as well as a new custom action button on SOOrderEntry. Both Tenants have the same Customization Projects loaded (via Export / Import). When I publish the projects in Tenant A, the custom action appears in both Tenant A and Tenant B, but the custom fields only appear in Tenant A. When I publish the project in Tenant B, the inverse happens (fields disappear from Tenant A, appear in Tenant B, and the new custom action still appears on both).I can’t make the custom fields appear in both Tenants at the same time for some reason. I’ve never had this issue in any other environment. I’m at a loss to explain what is going on here...

How to Calculate  Landed Cost for  items in Drop-Ship Order . In Normal Practice Yes its Not Possible since drop-ship orders are shipped directly from the supplier to the customer without passing through your warehouse

Hello,Really struggling with this one. Customer uses Crystal reports for a year on year analysis so can do full sql etc. I’m trying to reproduce this below in a GI and this is for a specific customer Where is becomes difficult is that when they go live there is no last year data although we will have a legacy dac and that is challenge when there is no option to do union, has anyone else achieved this ?

We know that Acumatica supports two entry points to create Credit Memo, I refer to them as SO Credit Memo and AR Credit Memo for short. Is there a way to restrict most users to only create SO Credit Memo from the SO Invoice entry, while only specific people have the permission to directly create AR Credit Memo in "Invoices and Memos"?The difficulties I encountered:Although the entry points of these credit memos are different, they seem to be essentially the same entity. SO Credit Memo will be converted into AR Credit Memo. I only want specific people to be able to create AR Credit Memo, but I also want other users to have permission to create AR Invoice. They are on the same screen and are different types of the same document, so I cannot directly restrict the "+" button on the "Invoices and Memos" screen.