Discussion Forums

Hi all,We extract users from Acumatica with OData v4 (Python), DAC PX_SM_Users. The DAC endpoint returns fewer users than the GI on the same table. Odata return 523 usersGI return 762 usersBoth methods are using the same condition.Version: Acumatica Cloud ERP 2025 R2 (build 25.201.0213) Understood I can call the GI using OData, but i want to understand why this happens?   

Is there any idea from where system bringing the value for Harmonized Tariff number in Commercial Invoice.  

Hello Acumatica Community,We are a glove manufacturer catering to the export market, operating across 14 factories. Our production runs multi-stage structures including Compound BOMs, Catalog Products, and Finished Goods (FG) BOMs. We run batch/lot-type production. We are currently formalizing the daily and weekly cost-checking workflows for our factory accountants. While the plant teams are managing physical production tasks well, we need to establish better visibility, standardized review processes, and clear accountability inside Acumatica Manufacturing Edition. Specifically, we want to align our accounting team on three primary pillars:Identifying standard Acumatica cost-related screens, generic inquiries (GIs), and reports they should audit daily/weekly. Structuring an awareness and training protocol for cost checking. Establishing a strict execution and review process (e.g., handling WIP reconciliations and production variances).  Additionally, we are rolling out a workflow chang

Hi, One of our clients just got upgraded to 2026R1 from 2025R2 and we noticed that AI Assistant is not in the Enable/Disable feature for them to activate, why is that?Is it a licensing issue?

Hi there everyone,Our company recently upgraded to 26R1, we noticed a few bugs here and there, but one that seems to be prevalent is an issue with the autocomplete box.  For example, when typing in an item into the Sales Order screen, typically a box automatically comes down, giving you different autocomplete options to choose from. However, now it is only loading the first 15 rows of that, and then showing only blank rows afterwards.This happens both on the Classic and Modern UI, and it happens for all fields that can be auto completed, like Inventory ID and Customer. Each time it shows the first 15 results, and then the remaining populated rows are blank. If you click on one of the blank rows, something is actually entered in, it looks like the text in the autofill box is just invisible to us. Has anyone else experienced this?

As per Top Management’s request, as the Acumatica ERP Implementation Project Manager, I need to provide a report that meets the requirements below. Please advise whether Acumatica has a built-in facility for this.Cash Inflow (branch-wise): Local sales, Import sales, Bank facilitiesCash Outflow (branch-wise): PO payments (local and import), Other direct payments for expenses, with major categoriesOther requirements: A Total column, Selectable reporting period

When applying a screen configuration in the Modern UI, it asks if the Personal Configurations should be preserved or overwritten. But how we know which users have Personal Configurations?

Hi, we finally upgraded from 2023 to Build 2026.101.301.174 [26.101.0225.3].  Where can I find  what Acumatica Report version is compatible with this version and where can I download it from?

Business NeedOrganizations that utilize shift differentials may have payroll policies or collective bargaining agreements requiring the differential amount to be paid only on regular hours worked. In these scenarios, overtime premiums must be calculated using the employee's base hourly rate and should not include the shift differential amount.Current LimitationCurrently, when a shift differential is configured as an addition to an employee's hourly rate, the differential becomes part of the employee's regular rate of pay. As a result, overtime calculations are based on the increased rate, causing the shift differential to be included in the overtime rate calculation.Requested EnhancementProvide a configuration option that allows administrators to control whether a shift differential is included in overtime rate calculations.Suggested setup options:Include Shift Differential in Overtime Calculation (current behavior) Exclude Shift Differential from Overtime CalculationWhen the exclusion

Reconfigure Amazon Order Mappings for the Orders API v2026 Migration Amazon is transitioning from the Selling Partner API Orders v0 to the new Orders API v2026-01-01(new API).Amazon originally announced that the old API operations would be removed in August 2026. The removal date has now been extended to March 27, 2027, giving customers additional time to complete the transition.Acumatica has updated the Amazon Connector to support the new API based on the initial August 2026 date. Customers with existing Amazon stores must complete an important manual configuration step after upgrading.Please check the attached document for the old vs new mappings.Who is affected?This action applies to existing Amazon Connector implementations running one of the following Acumatica versions: Acumatica version Minimum supported update 2026 R2 All builds 2026 R1 GA Patch 4 or later; build 26.100.0175.4 or later Service Pack 1 Patch 1 or later; build 26.101.0225

Hi,I'm wondering if someone can help me automate a task based off a business event and schedule a report to send. Logic; Whenever a new payment is added to the Payment & Application screen. I want to run the AR register report at the end of the day at a specific time and email that report to a select number of emails. If there is no payment added to the payment & application screen then no report should be ran for that day. I know Acumatica has business events, and schedules available to do this. I'm just wondering what would be the best way to do this?  Any insight or suggestions is greatly appreciated.

Hi everyone,I’d like to better understand how the Purchase Orders screen in the mobile app is used in practice.If your team uses it, I’d love to hear:Who uses it (buyers, warehouse staff, approvers, field or project teams, someone else)? What do they do with it: look up an order, create one, approve, attach photos or documents, send or print for a vendor? In what situation, for example talking to a driver at the dock, creating an order on site, or approving while traveling? What’s missing or awkward on the mobile screen (fields, actions, tabs) that you had to customize or work around? If it didn’t fit your workflow, what got in the way?Thanks in advance!

Hi all, We upgraded to 2026 R1 (26.101.0225) and started moving screens over to Modern UI. Since then, users whose role has View Only access to an analytical report can no longer run it. Same roles and same access rights as before, and these reports ran fine for them in Classic UI.What we're seeing on an analytical report (RM screen) in Modern UI, by the role's access level on that report:- View Only: the Run Report button is greyed out.- Edit: Run Report can be clicked, but the report fails with "Object reference not set to an instance of an object."- Insert: the report runs normally.- Delete: runs (same as Insert). The Request Profiler shows the Edit failure here:PX.Data.Reports.ReportMaint.FillReportSettings()PX.Data.Reports.ReportMaint.FillReport()PX.Data.Reports.ReportMaint.runReport(PXAdapter) What we've found so far:- In Modern UI the report parameters page runs on ReportMaint with Report as the primary record, and it opens as a new unsaved (draft) record. In Classic, reports on

Is it possible to set up restrictions so that when a user is working in a company, they only have access to warehouses assigned to that company when the user also has access to other companies.Example:Employee A has access to Company 1, Company 2, and Company 3 Each Company has three warehouses assigned to it: Company 1: Warehouse 1A, 1B, & 1C Company 2: Warehouse 2A, 2B, & 2C. Company 3: Warehouse 2A, 2B, & 2C CURRENTLY: When Employee A is entering a PO in Company 1, they can select any of the nine warehouses I WANT: When Employee A is in Company 1, they can only select Warehouses 1A, 1B, or 1C and when they switch to Company 2, they can only select 2A, 2B, or 2C, etc.We have multiple companies that are separate entities but frequently buy and sell from/to each other and multiple employees that need the company access in order to generate intercompany PO/SO/Bill/Invoice etc. transactions. This leaves a lot of room for error (and a lot of choices) when selecting the ware

Hello,We are troubleshooting an issue with the built-in eSign / DocuSign integration after upgrading a client to Acumatica 2026 R1.The client’s Acumatica-to-DocuSign integration has been down since the upgrade. We are able to get to the DocuSign authorization screen and select Allow Access, but after DocuSign redirects back to Acumatica, Acumatica displays:“The connection to the eSign provider has failed.”We have been working with Acumatica Support and DocuSign Support, but have not yet found a resolution.Current findings:DocuSign Support has confirmed the following:The Integration Key / Client ID is valid. The Client Secret is valid. The initial authentication call from Acumatica to DocuSign is successful. The issue appears to occur after DocuSign authorization, when Acumatica attempts to complete the connection.Redirect URIs tested:We have attempted several redirect URI formats in DocuSign, including:https://denizenhome.acumatica.com/Pages/ES/ESign.aspxhttps://denizenhome.acumatica.c

Hey everyone!I've been exploring the AI Automation agent functionality in 2026 R2 and was curious if there's been any additional discussion around expanding the supported LLM providers.Currently, we have OpenAI, Anthropic, Azure, and AWS Bedrock available through Agent LLM Connections. I saw the community poll earlier this year regarding potential support for additional providers like Google Gemini, Grok, Mistral, and others.Has Acumatica shared any updates on whether additional providers are planned for an upcoming release, or if there's a tentative timeline for expanding the available options?I'm particularly interested in whether we'll eventually see more flexibility in selecting models from additional providers when configuring agents.Would love to hear if anyone has any insight into what's on the roadmap!

​ Table of ContentOverview Terminology Attributes Family in Acumatica Framework PXAttributeFamily Attribute and Root Types DAC Field Attributes and Attribute Families Example of Attribute FamiliesOverviewIn Acumatica Framework sometimes you stumble upon a term attribute family. You may have seen some Acumatica attributes with the PXAttributeFamily attribute declared on them. Acumatica Customization Editor also has a built-in data consistency validation of customization projects  for the PXAttributeFamily attribute violations on DAC fields:https://beacon.acumatica.com/r/Customization-Update-Guide-2026-R1/Validating-Customization-Projects/Validation-of-Customization-Projects-ISV-Solutions#entry_1  TerminologyIt will be useful to establish some common terminology first. In Acumatica Framework we map data records from the database to DACs and columns from the DB tables are mapped to DAC fields. This mapping is usually configured by placing the attributes derived from the PXEventSubscribe

 We would like to maintain a list of all GI’s that are used in dashboard so that we know changes to the GI could impact DBIs there a way to see all Generic Inquiries that are used in dashboards?  

Please provide feedback on the Modern UI if you have issues with it so that Acumatica can focus on improvements to it.  Acumatica AI will pick up your feedback for them to focus on improving it prior to the 26R2 release when the classic UI goes away.

We have 2 email templates for sending POs.  One for standard POs and one for Blanket POs.How can I set the default email template for Blanket Po’s to be different than standard PO template?Who there need to be logic on the report mailing settings?  Would someone have an examples of what this logic would like ?  

Hello!I am required to translate the Acumatica into some other language. For that I have enabled the locales to that language, but do I have to translate each into that langugae by providing manually? Are there any packages which contains the translations that I can buy? Thank You

When will Acumatica add the Credit Check process to Service Orders/Appointments and Projects?

Hi everyone,I have a question regarding the Historical Inventory Valuation report.When we create an invoice and ship the items, the transaction will reflect the Sales Amount in the report. However, I would like to understand whether this transaction should also reduce the Receipt Amount in the report, or whether the Receipt Amount should remain unchanged.Currently, the Receipt Amount is not displayed in the report, so I would appreciate it if someone could clarify how the Receipt Amount is supposed to work in this scenario.Thank you in advance for your help! 

Hi everyone,I'm customizing the existing TaskID field from the POLine DAC on the Subcontract screen (SC301000) to allow selecting tasks belonging to completed projects.Currently, when I remove the hold from a subcontract, I receive the following error:The {0} project is completed.Customization Codepublic class SubcontractEntry_Extension : PXGraphExtension<SubcontractEntry>{ [PXDefault( typeof(Search<PMTask.taskID, Where<PMTask.projectID, Equal<Current<POLine.projectID>>, And<PMTask.isDefault, Equal<True>>>>), PersistingCheck = PXPersistingCheck.Nothing)] [PXRemoveBaseAttribute( typeof(ActiveOrInPlanningProjectTaskAttribute))] [PXDimensionSelector( "PROTASK", typeof(Search<PMTask.taskID, Where<PMTask.projectID, Equal<Current<POLine.projectID>>>>), typeof(PMTask.taskCD), typeof(PMTask.taskCD),

Has anyone run into this issue, we are setting up emailing in our Acumatica system. To make IT’s life easier, we are giving view access to the users to view the email templates. However, I have one user in Accounting who is getting this error when trying to access the AP Vendor Payment Email Template. All security groups/ roles have view only access to the email templates, but my user is unable to view this one template and I have no idea why.What access am I missing to allow him to view this email template? Thanks in advance for any help.