Discussion Forums

Having an issue trying to cost Inventory to Projects. Here is our workflow:We create a Service Order and associate it to a Project. We then requisition items by either creating POs within the Service Order, Appointment, or Project. I can confirm that when the items on these POs are received, they are going into Project Stock and not Free Stock. However, when attempting to Run Billing on the Appointment we are receiving the below error. It is as though the Service Order/Appointment is trying to create an Inventory Issue from Free Stock. Is there some setting I am missing to make the Service Orders create an Inventory Issue using Project Stock?I do not want to “Allow Issue from Free Stock” as the material I am trying to bill is in Project Stock

I’ve been playing with creating a new state in our sales order workflow.  The goal is to have a “Staged for Setup” workflow on certain order types that would take place between Open/Backorder and Shipping.I was able to create the state easily enough, and the transitions into the state.  My problem comes up with getting out of that state.  While I have a transition out of “Staged for Setup” for “Create Shipment->Shipping”, the “Create Shipment” action is disabled when I’m in this new state.  I did add the Create Shipment action to the Actions tab of the new state but it is still disabled.Is there something I’m missing for getting the actions that I want to be able to take enabled in this new state?

What is the trick to get a default value on this screen for the Warehouse? It is a customized screen vs a GI, but am not entirely sure. Does it need to be coded in, or can it be added in a simpler manner? Thanks   

We have setup a Pending Approval Notification in Purchase Orders Preferences that whenever a purchase order goes for approval, the approver gets an email that there is a PO that needs to be approved.  There is also Mailing & Printing to notify that the PO has been created. Is there a way to notify the requestor that the PO has been approved without creating a business event or another email template? Probably an auto-generated email that PO has been approved. Thanks so much for your time. 

Recently updated to 2025R2 and using Modern UI, the column configuration is not saving, even when changed on the column configuration button (now gear) and saving it.  Any ideas on how to make the new configuration stick?  

Currently, in Sales Order Preferences, there is only one default Shipment Numbering Sequence configured (e.g., SH####).However, the business requirement is to have different shipment numbering sequences depending on the Order Type.For example: Standard Orders → SH#### RW Order Type → SL#### Is it possible to configure multiple shipment numbering sequences based on Order Type? If not available natively, is there a workaround (e.g., customization, automation, business event)?

Hi All,As per our requirement I have created a new COA 20040 - while creating the same selected use default sub account check box and saved.  At the same time while creating Non Stock Items selected this sales account and updating  default sub account.  it is not allowing me to save and showing an error as below 'Sales Sub.' cannot be found in the system. Please verify whether you have proper access rights to this object.  I have verified all access rights and provided necessary accounts.  Stil showing same error.  Please help me how to fix this issue.  

It would be nice to create the Prepayment as a “request” to send to the customer. But the Sales Order status remains as Awaiting Prepayment until the Prepayment is Released. While the Prepayment is still Balanced, that would indicate that the payment is not yet received.  A workaround is to create the Prepayment in AR Payments and don’t link to the Sales order until after payment is received. But this requires more effort on the part of AR team and making sure they link to the correct Sales Order.Is there any way to control this?  To leave the Sale Order Awaiting Prepayment until the Prepayment linked to the Sales Order is Released?

Hi AllFor the last few days I have been getting the error shown in the screenshot below in my Production environment which causes the application to be stuck on a loading screen. Any ideas on what cuases this and how to have it fixed, please? Currently to fix it, I restart the server because I’m not sure where else to check. My version is 25R1 and it is a PCS deployment. 

Hi,Building an integration with Shopify for a client. I am using custom fields to store the order ID keys and there is a PXCheckUnique in place on this field to prevent duplication. #region UsrMAXXShopifyOrderID [PXDBString(30)] [PXCheckUnique( Where = typeof(Where<SOOrderExt.usrMAXXShopifyOrderID, Equal<Current<SOOrderExt.usrMAXXShopifyOrderID>>>))] [PXUIField(DisplayName = "Shopify Order ID", Enabled = false)] public string UsrMAXXShopifyOrderID { get; set; } public abstract class usrMAXXShopifyOrderID : PX.Data.BQL.BqlString.Field<usrMAXXShopifyOrderID> { } #endregionThis validation works as expected in the UIHowever, if an identi

Acumatica has been consistently releasing new versions (R1 and R2) every six months, bringing valuable enhancements and new features. The pace of innovation is appreciated, and many of the new capabilities are genuinely useful.However, from an implementation and consulting perspective, we are increasingly facing challenges during version upgrades.In several upgrade scenarios, we have observed: Existing functionality that previously worked without issue begins to fail or behave differently. Customizations and reports requiring unexpected rework. Performance inconsistencies post-upgrade. Support responses indicating the issue is a “known issue” and will be addressed in a future release. While we understand that no system upgrade is perfect, it becomes difficult to explain to customers why stable functionality in the previous version is impacted after moving to a newer release — especial

Hi,I wanted to see if there were separate rules for INSiteStatus vs. INLocationStatus’ QtyAvail fields?INSiteStatus returns a value for QtyAvail that matches the INventory Allocation summary in that it deducts ON Issue, Allocated and BAckordered - which are defined in our default calculation rules.For INLocationStatus, it is only deducting the on issue amount but not allocated / backordered. is this an incorrect behavior that we need to correct or done on purpose?ThanksJoseph

Hello everyone!I’ve recently been upgrading several custom pages—and extensions of standard pages—to the Acumatica Modern UI. Below is a collection of notes, lessons learned, and practical tips that I hope will help others going through the same process. If you have additional insights or best practices, please feel free to add them in the comments!  1. Quick-Start Process for Converting Classic Forms to Modern UIThe process flow for converting Classic forms is not always intuitive. Here is a simplified guide to get your custom forms converted quickly. (Note: For extensions of standard forms, I’ve had the most success creating the Modern UI files manually and then moving them into the development folder.)Steps:In your web.config, set the screenConverter attribute shouldFilesbeDownloaded="False". Navigate to your custom form

I’m trying to pull one character out of the PMProject.ContractCD field in Report Designer.  Using this expression...=Substring(CStr([PMProject.ContractCD]), 5, 1)...a “0” is always shown no matter what number is in the numeric 8 position field.  This expression DOES work in a GI, however, and pulls the correct digit.  How can I get this to work in Report Designer?   

Hi Community,I have two configuration- related questions regarding Production Order behavior1.Default Status when creating a New Production Order: when creating a new Production Order, it automatically goes to Planned Status. Is there a way to make it default to Hold status first?2. In the Production Order Maintenance – Reference tab- when using an Inventory ID that already has a BOM assigned, should the system automatically pull the BOM ID and Revision? Is there any way both BOM ID and BOM Revision can be left blank by default? I’m trying to understand if this is standard system behavior or controlled by configuration.

Creating a construction schedule - calendar view or Gant view displaying each project and the duration. This could be a separate screen or a widget option within a dashboard. Having the calendar view would our company to see gaps in work and the scheduling of project teams (site supers, project managers and admin, and subcontractors). We currently need to use a third party resource to accomplish this task.

Hi everyone,We have a client who needs to email supporting attachments that were originally attached to the AP Bill record. These attachments contain commission detail information that brokers require for reconciliation purposes.We are currently scoping a customization that would pull bill-level attachments into an outbound email notification, and based on our design, we expect it to meet the requirement.However, the client is evaluating AP automation solutions (TrailD and Yooz), and we’re trying to determine: Do these ISVs sync original vendor attachments back to the AP Bill in Acumatica? Do they provide any native functionality for including those attachments in outbound emails (such as remittance or custom notifications)? Or would this still require a customization even when using one of these integrations? Has anyone implemented TrailD or Yooz and addressed attachment/email requirements like

I have this GI that is looking at SO Lines. I am wanting to restrict which SO Line is showed based on the site ID. I heard (correct me if I am wrong) that if I can filter via the relations table, the GI can run faster (vs using the conditions tab or creating filters in the user facing GI). But I can’t seem to make it work. I’ve tried every variation I know (hence lines 2 and 3 are different in the child field. If creating this filter in the conditions tab will the direction I should go, then I don’t even need to link the SOLine and INSite tables.

Hello All,We are implementing Acumatica and are debating whether to use AWS or SharePoint to store document.  In our case, we would like to give access to a Contract Manufacturer only to specific subset of design documents.  Has anyone implemented solution capable of controlled access, upload nottifications, and revision control?

Hello Community,Could you help me with code that allows me to create a discount code and then apply it to a sales order?I am creating the discount code, and it is being created correctly — all the data is saved properly in both the header and the details. However, when I try to apply it to a sales order, the discount code is not applied: the sequence ID is not generated automatically, and when I set the sequence ID manually, the type is not set. By contrast, if I create the same discount manually and apply it to a sales order, all the fields are saved correctly.  

Hi everyone,I’m working on an import scenario for the Shipments screen (SO302000) to upload serial numbers on the Line Details screen.Right now, my scenario finds the shipment and uploads the serial numbers — but all serial numbers are ending up on the first shipment line, regardless of which item they belong to.What is the proper way to configure this import scenario,   

Just checking for a little advice.First, I’d love if this were possible with in-box or Generic Inquiry type solutions.Barring that I’m questioning how to modify the available columns in this selector box (or any given selector box really).“Select Revision” BoxIdeally I could click the gear icon on the “Select Revision” pop-up. But it doesn’t show any columns that aren’t already shown.If I have a UDF or another field that isn’t already shown, I’d like to be able to add them by default.Is there any way to do this in-box?If not, does this post represent the best path forward, and wher

Hi All,Acumatica's Production Cycle for a manufactured product consists of 2 major steps: 1) produce volume first and then 2) subsequently, pack the volume into the required SKU.In such a scenario, is there a way to ensure that there is full availability of all materials required for producing a specific volume of a product, prior to confirming a Production Order? If yes, how and where can this be implemented/checked? In other words, a Production Order should not be allowed to proceed further (any subsequent steps) if there is either no or not enough material as required to produce a specific volume of the manufactured product.The same applies to the 2nd part above i.e. to again ensure that all packaging material required is available in full quantity during a request for Packaging Materials. Since this is a separate TR request (Inter Warehouse Transfer), how to ensure that this TR request is tied to the Production Order from step 1 above? The reason being, in o

We are relatively new to Acumatica and would like to understand totally how the COGS labor/burden are captured throughout the manufacturing process and where/how costing is hitting the GL.  Currently what we are seeing is labor costs debiting WIP and crediting an account set up in ‘Labor Codes’ ---when the finished good product is produced, the total cost for material, labor, burden costs are crediting WIP and debiting our finished goods GL account.  The labor and overhead costs are not being posted separately or captured in a GL account.  In our previous ERP system, the labor, burden, overhead and material costs hit separate GL accounts.  We can see the amounts for Labor Planned, Labor Actual and Labor Variance amounts in the Production Order which produced the goods.  Any clarification would be most helpful.  

Hello Community,I want these changes on the original screens. For my custom screens, this worked when I added actionsConfig: { exportToExcel: { hidden: true } } in the @gridConfig of the .ts file.