Discussion Forums

I am trying to update the default supplier on non stock items.The client wants to replace the current default supplier with the new one, rather than add a row.I have been able to achieve this but the last supplier price is not being overwritten. I believe it should be 0 unless stock has been purchased by that supplier in the past. I am not sure what the behaviour of the last supplier price would be here, if it would update in that way.Importing with the below replaces the existing default supplier with the new one but the last supplier price remains the same. I assume it is doing the same if I click in the Supplier Id field on the non stock items suppliers tab and select a new ID. Having tested this, the last supplier price also does not change.The import scenario should need to remove the supplier completely for a new one to be imported correctly?

Hello linkies,Hope y’all doing well.I have been trying to create Wave Picklist for a Shipment with multiple locations.So here’s the scenario: I am looking to assign multiple pickers to the wave lists - one wave list for single shipment - with inventories from same warehouse but different locations - for those different locations different pickers to be assigned.I have created a Shipment as shown below:  And now when I try to Create a Pick List by filtering the values on the basis of the Location, the system doesn’t display the results in the table as shown below:  Also, upon creating a Wave Picklist, when I proceed to assign, the system displays me only 1 picker for one wavelist. Whereas, I have not been able to assign the same picklist to different pickers-as the locations are different:    Can anyone please guide me what I am missing here? Thank you in advance.

The below has been submitted to our support partner.Issue: A PXLockViolation error is thrown when attempting to save a change to the production order warehouse for a production order with a linked sales order, when the "Yes" option is selected in the popup dialogue to also change the warehouse on the line of the related sales order.This error is present when no customizations are published and the sales demo data is loaded, so it is very simple to reproduce.  Confirmed Affected Versions:26.100.0175.2 26.100.0175.5 26.200.0334   Steps to Reproduce:  Create a production order from a sales order, or link an existing sales order and production order. Ensure the Production order is in the Planned status.  Change the production order warehouse.  In the popup dialogue box that asks, "Do you want to update the warehouse in the <1> line of the <SO> <SO009312> sales order?" click "Yes".  Attempt to save the production order.  The error message "Error: Another process ha

I have using Bank feeds connected to Chase and Capital One with Plaid for quite some time. I am now getting a "No access token returned: invalid_scope" error and not able to delete the feed or update credentials. Can someone advise what is causing this?

Hi All,Looking for some guidance on a drop‑ship correction scenario in Acumatica 2025 R1.We accidentally created a Drop‑Ship PO linked to a Sales Order (SO), but the intention was to create a regular stocking PO. To unwind this mistake, a user processed:A Drop‑Ship PO Receipt (released) And then a Drop‑Ship PO Return (also released)These two transactions fully offset each other financially.The PO is now in Closed status.However, the Sales Order is stuck.Here is the sequence:The SO originally auto‑completed because the PO receipt was released I used Reopen Order After reopening, the SO went into Back Order status All lines have Open Qty = 0 The SO still shows POSource = Drop‑Ship Unchecking PO Linked does NOT remove the linkage "Cancel Order" fails with:“The sales order cannot be canceled because some items have been shipped.”There is no option to Close Order in the Actions menu The SO item is Non‑Stock, which limits inventory correction options Drop‑Ship PO only had one line — the SO h

export class TimecardWithTotals_Custom { //@linkCommand("ViewTimecard") //@removeDecorator("linkCommand") @columnConfig({ editorConfig: { linkCommand: "ViewTimecard" } }) TimeCardCD: PXFieldState; }I tried all to remove the link command, nothing works

Is there a way to fix this?Issue: We start a SO and mark items for PO. Sometimes, PO is created and gone through the normal process. Other times, PO is created but then customer changes their minds and cancels the order all together. We “cancel” the SO accordingly. But it’ll still show these in the dashboard for “POs to create.” I was able to go in a few, reopen SO and uncheck the boxes. But some, it won’t let me. Gives me an error message saying it’ll cause the inventory ID to go negative. UGH! I’m just REOPENING the SO. I’m not finalizing anything or invoicing anything. There is more than in this screenshot.

Hello,  When I am creating production orders from different screens, the default scheduling method value is different. Is there someone who knows how this value gets defaulted exactly?Thank You!

We upgraded a client’s sandbox from R25 to R26. When testing sending over bills via the API, this json no longer works like it did in R25.  We get the following error:'SuppliedByVendorID' cannot be empty.; SuppliedByVendorID: 'SuppliedByVendorID' cannot be empty.Here is a screenshot and the json at the bottom. {"Amount":{"value":18200.0},"BranchID":{"value":"EMTS NORTH"},"Date":{"value":"2026-09-29T00:00:00"},"Description":{"value":"BOSS|24193|113977|Mulch for Great Wolf"},"Details":[{"Account":{"value":"5200"},"SubAccount":{"value":"02.00"},"Project":{"value":"X"},"Qty":{"value":1.0},"TransactionDescription":{"value":"Cost of Material -Change"},"UnitCost":{"value":18200.0},"UOM":{"value":"EA"}}],"Hold":{"value":false},"PostPeriod":{"value":"09-2026"},"Project":null,"Status":{"value":"Open"},"Terms":{"value":"N30"},"Type":{"value":"Bill"},"Vendor":{"value":"V0002798"},"VendorRef":{"value":"23496"},"ReferenceNbr":null,"_links":null, "LocationID": {"value": "MAIN"}}

Hi,One user experienced a popup error stating “PXSerialChart is not defined” in the system. This issue is intermittent and occurs inconsistently in different forms. However, once the user clicks OK, the error disappears and the screen continues to work normally. What could be the reason for this? Thanks! 

It seems no matter where we add information either in the description field or the Other tab it is limited and we run out of room for explanation and it does not all print on the invoice form.  We often have several appointments with lots of details that we bill on one invoice, but the wording on the invoice gets cut off.  Does anyone know how to get unlimited characters in the description field and other tab and get them to print on the invoice?

Our production lines use the same inventory items across multiple buildings and production areas. Each work center has dedicated inventory locations that are physically closest to where the material is consumed. However, when material is issued to production, Acumatica defaults to the item's single "Default Issue From" location. We then have it set up to pull inventory from the next available location if there is none available in the Default location. We understand that each user can change the issue location during the Material release process, but we are faced with several challenges related to this task.Additional manual steps for every material issue to change locations. Increased risk of selecting the wrong location. Inventory inaccuracies when material is physically consumed from one location, but system transactions are recorded against another. Difficulty maintaining accurate on-hand balances across multiple buildings and production areas. We’d like the system to automati

In 25R2 I have an admin user account that has access to the AR Invoices and Memos, yet when I try to access the odata for the DAC, I get a 403 after entering my credentials.https://url.acumatica.com/t/tenant/api/odata/dac/ARTaxTran?$top=1The same user works on other DAC level odata endpoints. I also tried the odata4 url string:https://url.acumatica.com/ODatav4/tenant/ARTaxTran?$top=1I assume I’m missing something simple :-)

Hi all,I've open-sourced MuiLint, a linter for the Acumatica Modern UI in Visual Studio rather than Visual Studio Code like AcuMate. The HTML merge fails quietly: a selector typo, a self-closing <field/> or a Usr field missing from the TypeScript just means the field never appears. MuiLint flags them as you type.Visual Studio: squiggles, lightbulb fixes, completions, and F12 into the stock HTML or the .ts CI: a command-line tool and a GitHub Action, with SARIF output 13 rules, configurable through .editorconfig, with no running site neededIt works alongside AcuMate (VS Code) and Acuminator (C#) rather than replacing either.Get the .vsix from the latest release. False positives count as bugs, so please report them on GitHub or here.Not affiliated with or endorsed by Acumatica.

Hi All,Do Acumatica has a way to prevent users from changing their password to the same password they are currently using? If this functionality is not available out of the box, please advise on the recommended approach to implement this requirement.Thank you.  

Hey all!I want to understand how the dead stock inquiry is calculated. We are in a manufacturing setting so our consumption of inventory are “issues” instead of sales.  How is the “dead stock quantity” and the “In dead stock (Days)” calculated?  Thanks for your help!

Has anyone modified the AIA report to allow for parameters?  Also, can a modified report be set up on the project>mailing & printing tab to be the default format?

Hello,I am trying to consolidate/combine Invoices for multiple Sales Orders through “Process Orders” screen. The Sales Order Type is of template Type “IN” that does not require Shipments.Important to note that Avalara is the Tax Provider. This functionality out of the box works fine when I don’t have Tax Zones. In other words, if there no Avalara involved, the Invoices are being consolidated through “Process Orders” screen. However, when I apply the Tax Zone Avalara, the system is creating separate Invoices for each Sales Orders. Note: Each Sales Order has different Ship-To Address. I believe this is the reason. Has anyone faced this issue? Any advise will be very helpful!Thanks! 

Does Acumatica allow for singular invoices per Shipment? When I attempt to process shipments, the step of creating invoices based upon a shipment, consolidates all shipments that are confirmed for a customer (different shipment numbers and different order numbers) into one single invoice. How do I avoid this? Below you can see where the system is creating one large invoice for customer TEST90, although it covers 4 different shipments and 4 different orders. I would need the system to create one invoice per shipment.  

I am trying to create production order in holidays which is mentioned in exception of work calendar but its allowing me to do production.

I want to add a line item to a Sales Order, AR Invoice, Journal Entry and/or AP Bill, and be able to move it up above another line item.  Has anyone been able to do that?

Standard Acumatica practices for Loan GRN / Settlement: we are occasionally receiving materials from our competitors on loan, to be settled at a later date. What is the standard Acumatica Practices?

The Inventory Summary page would allow a user to navigate to the Inventory Allocation Details page by double clicking the line on Classic UI.In Modern UI, the user is unable to navigate there by double clicking. Is there any way to fix this? Did Modern UI break the functionality of that navigation?What other ones should I be aware of?The XSLT depreciation broke both the Inventory Summary, Storage Summary, etc in Microsoft Edge so converting back to Classic UI is not an option.We are currently on Acumatica 2025 R2 Build 25.201.0213.6.Inventory Summary on Classic UI.Navigation after double clicking the location line for the Inventory Item. Modern UI gives no feedback when clicking the line. 

Hello,Does anyone know the setup in the Commerce module to allow for the tracking number to be sent back to BC from Acumatica? I am unsure if this setup is the correct setup, but I know we not currently having tracking IDs sent back to BC.