Get inspired and gain all the knowledge you need
Recently active
We have recently upgraded from Acumatica 2024R2 to 2025R2, and we are still using the Classic UI (not Modern UI). In our previous 2024R2 environment, we were able to display the Total Cost field on the PO Receipts (PO302000) form, which showed the total monetary value of the received items.However, after upgrading to 2025R2, the Total Cost field is no longer visible on the PO Receipt page, What is the recommended way to re-add the Total Cost field to the PO Receipts (PO302000) form
the issue I am seeing now but wasn't there before is. When you link a SO to create a PO. The create PO is taking the date listed under the ship to date vs the requested on date stated on the SO. Any one know how to fix that? here are screen shots: SO: Create PO: should state Jan 28th but it doesnt.
Ive been getting questions from our engineer to order team about utilizing Planning Production Orders to drive demand, instead of utilizing BOMs. However, I haven't been able to find any documented process of “next steps” after initially driving demand. Is there much of a documented process to replacing or changing to Regular production orders once ready to produce? It seems from initial research, that any use of PL Production Order Types is simply a manual management of use. Any help would be appreciated!
We have a customer who wants to use multiple virtual warehouses to allocate stock.In reality, all of the items are in the same physical location.If a particular warehouse is selected on the sales order, so in turn the shipment, is it possible to change the warehouse that the item is picked from when using the Automated Warehouse Operations/handheld device?
Does anyone know the answer to this question from our customer? We are getting ready to go live with the ability to ship internationally out of Acumatica. We were testing a shipment this morning and comparing the label that printed to the label that prints from UPS Worldship, and the Worldship label has a second label printed that is a barcode version of the commercial invoice. Is it possible that we can get the commercial invoice that is created in acumatica to also print out as a second label to be placed on the package? We were told by our UPS rep that the second barcode label needs to be on the box so customs can scan and bring it up electronically.
Yes you can export tracking number from Acumatica to BigCommerce/Shopify. To do so you nee to put tracking numbers in the line with box under Packages Tab.Keep in mind following rules: When shipments that include multiple boxes with separate tracking numbers are exported from Acumatica ERP to BigCommerce or Shopify, the system checks if the following conditions are met: • Each item in the shipment is linked with a particular box. If an item is not assigned to any box, the system displays an error. • Each box in the shipment contains at least one item. If a box is not assigned at least one item, the system displays an error. During the synchronization of shipments with Shopify or BigCommerce, for each box in the shipment, a separate shipment with a separate tracking number is created in the online store. Boxes that don't have any items assigned or are missing a tracking number are not exported to the online store.
Hi everyone,I'm currently trying to connect a FLEX synchronization scenario to a secure SFTP server. The SFTP server has been configured to use OpenSSH public/private key authentication.I followed the official documentation carefully: https://help.acumatica.com/(W(14))/Wiki/ShowWiki.aspx?pageid=d9555f46-0a48-4059-8082-decc6b8e3652 However, when I try to establish the connection, I get the following error message:Permission denied (publickey) FYI : The SFTP user does not have a password (only key-based access) but FLEX seems to hash the password even when the password field is left empty, which might be causing the authentication to fail.
I am having trouble moving GI Condition rows using the “Move Row Up” and “Move Row Down” buttons. When I select a row and click the “Move Row Up” button nothing happens. In my screenshot below, the only way I can “move” the row at the bottom up to the second row is to delete all 17 intervening rows and then manually add them all back below the new row. I don't have an option to import criteria either, which would be useful here.Is this really the only way to “insert” a GI condition somewhere other than the bottom row?Can’t Edit GI Criteria Row Order Thank you!
We’re currently preparing for an MRP implementation in Acumatica, and one of the key risks we’re anticipating is how the system will handle split Sales Orders tied to the same item.Due to capital budget constraints, it’s common in our environment for a single project/item to be split across multiple Sales Orders—sometimes up to 6–8 based on customer capital funding limits (typically around $5,000 per order). From an operational standpoint, these do not represent separate demand signals; they reflect a single underlying requirement that is fragmented for financial reasons.Our concern is how MRP will interpret this structure:Will each split SO be treated as independent demand, potentially inflating supply signals? What is the best way to maintain a unified supply strategy (single PO or Production Order) while demand is distributed across multiple SOs? Are there recommended configurations, linking mechanisms, or planning practices to prevent duplicate or excessive planned orders in this s
We have an original invoice of $10,000 with 2% cash discount for payment within 10 days.We returned goods worth $1,000 via debit adjustment.The system still calculates cash discount based on the original invoice amount ($200 discount), instead of the adjusted net amount of $9,000 (correct discount should be $180).My temporary workaround: I used a $9,000 debit adjustment to offset the original bill, then recreated a new $9,000 bill to get the correct payment amount.Could anyone advise if this method is acceptable? Are there better solutions?
How do we update prices for service contracts?When we update a recurring price, this does not cascade to the next period. It reverts back to the original price from two periods ago. Is there a function to update prices and cascade those prices to every period forward?
We have a custom warehouse operations web application that integrates with Acumatica via the REST Contract-Based API. The app has its own user authentication system with individual named users (warehouse staff, receiving clerks, etc.). All API calls from our app currently go through a single shared service account, so every receipt, transfer, and AP bill created in Acumatica shows the same username in audit logs - we lose individual attribution entirely.We are aware of Option 1 - storing each user's Acumatica credentials in our system and logging in as them individually for each operation. This is the obvious solution but comes with real tradeoffs: every warehouse user needs an Acumatica license seat, credential storage and session management gets complex, and we'd need to manage separate Acumatica sessions per app user.Our question: Is there a supported or recommended approach in Acumatica to pass the identity of the originating user through API calls made by a service account, withou
Hi Acumatica Community,S4 Consulting is pleased to share that we are providing a Free Vietnamese Language Pack for Acumatica ERP for Acumatica users and implementation partners working with Vietnamese teams. Our Vietnamese Language Pack included:Menus, screens, and key business fields Standardized Vietnamese business terminology Support for both Web and Mobile interfacesWe are also happy to support Acumatica partners who have projects in Vietnam and need a practical localization option for their customers.You can view the full details here:https://s4.com.vn/en/vietnamese-language-pack-for-acumatica-erp/Thank you.
Hi Acumatica Community,I’d like to share a resource dedicated to Acumatica in Vietnam:https://acuerp.vn/This is a Vietnamese blog focused on practical Acumatica usage, built to support both businesses and consultants working in a local context.The main goal is straightforward:– Help companies understand how Acumatica fits real operations before implementation– Share hands-on configuration, customization, and deployment experience– Provide practical use cases instead of generic documentationKey highlights:– Content tailored to Vietnamese business environments (finance, distribution, construction, F&B)– Real implementation scenarios from actual projects– Guidance on system setup, workflows, and data structure– Insights into applying Acumatica for cost control and operational efficiencyIn many ERP projects in Vietnam, the challenge is not the software itself, but how to adapt it correctly to local business models. This blog focuses on solving that problem with real-world experience.Th
Hey Everyone, I heard of an update to Chrome that will deprecate XSLT. Long Story Short - Classic UI screens will break November 17, 2026 onward. https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/deprecating-xsltThe only workaround at the time is to use Firefox Browser (or other non-chromium browsers) or use an older version of Chrome / Edge. I believe Acumatica is working on a patch / workaround for earlier versions of Acumatica (that don’t have modern UI). Important update to keep on your radar less your Thanksgiving gets ruined 😅This adds an urgency to update screens to Modern UI. I’m not sure whether screens will crash or loose functionality. I’m going to try to manually turn-off XSLT to see how screens respond. Stay tuned in case any fix becomes available.
It's great that we have such a vibrant Acumatica community to get quick answers to questions and gain product knowledge! We have very active members jumping in to help others out all the time. The goal of the community is to respond to every member’s question so that no one goes away "empty handed".Connect, Learn, Share Karthik Gajendran - Acumatica Community Featured Member for April 2026Meet Karthik Gajendran our Acumatica Community Featured Member for April 2026. It’s great to have you as part of the Acumatica Community @KarthikGajendran! Acumatica Community Webinar - Data by Design II: Take Acumatica’s Report Designer to the Next Level - April 21, 2026 - RecordingReady to go beyond the basics? This intermediate session builds on Data by Design. If you’re comfortable modifying reports and working with data, it’s time to unlock more advanced capabilities that give you greater control and flexibility. Acumatica User GroupsNew! NorCal Acumatica User Group, Distribution Customer User G
We redesigned the PO641000 form and are able to print from Printed forms, but not from the actual Purchase Order on Screen PO301000. We are using 2025 R1 which has still the classic UI. Just went down an AI wormhole and still could not get a solution. All tips greatly appreciated.
Hi All,I am trying to get OpenOrderQty to show on a GI that is based on Purchase Receipts screen. I have linked POReceipt to POReceiptLine as per DAC Table, however the value for OpenOrder QTY does not show up.If someone can let me know what is missing in order to make this work, it would be wonderful.Kind regards,Calvin Law
Hey Guys,I need a little help, i have a back order report im pretty sure i found on here. ive made some changes, but i’d really like to show the expected dates for the items. Im having trouble relating tables todo so. Is it as simple as adding PO.POrder to the table then adding a relation? the relations confuse me.
I am trying to adjust a field so that the input is masked like a password field. I have it in my classic UI customization, but I am unable to find any resources for implementing this in the modern UI.The field in question is a base field on an Acumatica page. The field is the “Header Value” field in the “Push Notifications” page SM302000. I have two questions:The first is what and where do I add modifications to adjust this field to be masked as a password? Do I adjust the DAC definition for the modern UI, do I adjust the view definition of this field in an extension .ts file, and/or do I create an html extension field that modifies it?The second question is what would that syntax look like? What specifically do I need to add to create the password masking?I did try to look for examples within the provided Acumatica code, but was unable to find any examples.
Is there a way to map Tracking URL field on the PACKAGES tab of a Shipment to Shopify Tracking URL field?I see this field in the mapping: However, in the ERP Object / ERP Field / Value, I don’t see anything representing this field:
I am currently working with an Acumatica demo instance and planning to integrate with it via the API (Web service endpoints). Could you please provide information on the following:1. API rate limit — what is the maximum number of API calls permitted per minute?2. Concurrent calls — how many parallel API calls can be made by the same user at the same time?3. Transaction limit — is there a monthly cap on the number of transactions that can be created in the demo instance?Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Here is a real world scenario that I have experienced many times. In this actual case there are obvious low process maturity issues here - company leadership, change management and job roles and responsibilities not being followed. Not looking to discuss or debate those issues as that is internal to the company to resolve, rather experiences and outcomes, ease of use and lowering friction to increase user adoption on Acumatica processes that are stated to have too many clicks and are too rigid from a customers point of view.CustomerThe customer is a mid-market utility/civil contractor running Acumatica Construction Edition with a major disconnect between what the PO-to-payment process requires and what Project Managers are actually willing to do.The Designed Process1. PM creates POs for materials, rentals, fuel, equipment, etc., (all non-stock items)2. Materials are delivered to the job site3. PM enters a Purchase Receipt against the PO confirming what was delivered4. Accounting recei
I am having issues with adding a custom screen to the mobile app. The screen is a form tab with grid in the detail section. I want to have a few fields from the header show up and then a couple of fields from the grid to show up. The layout that I want it to look like is the first screen shot. I have the “Sign” action added in but it doesnt work for some reason and the “Paper clip” for attachments isnt showing up. If I remove the “layout = “HeaderSimple” from my code, the attachment paper clip shows up and the action works, but the fields in the header no longer show up (second screen shot). Any ideas on what I did wrong? This is my first time adding to the mobile app. I was looking at the documentation when I made it, but I can’t seem to get it right.add screen PTM00013 { add container "BOLHead" { add layout "BOLheader1"{ layout = "HeaderSimple" add layout "HeaderRow1"{ layout = "Inline" add field "BillOfLadingNumber" add field "Status" }
acuminator-mcp: Acuminator as an MCP servercontou-consulting/acuminator-mcp: Acuminator MCP ServerAcuminator is the Roslyn analyzer that ships with Acumatica. acuminator-mcp exposes it over MCP so AI assistants (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) can run it against their own output.Three tools:analyze_project runs Acuminator against a .csproj or .sln, returns diagnostics as code, file, line, column, project. analyze_snippet analyzes a raw C# snippet against a reference project (auto-discovered from the working directory). get_diagnostic_docs fetches the official docs for a PXNNNN code.Diagnostic messages are omitted on purpose. The code is the handle, the agent looks up details when it needs them. All three tools are marked read-only so auto-approve runs them without prompting.InstallWindows, .NET Framework 4.8 (the runner is net48 only, auto-downloaded on first use), Python 3.10+, pipx.pipx install git+https://github.com/contou-consulting/acuminator-mcp.git@v0.1.1claude mcp add --scope user a
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.