Discussion Forums

We have some items which we can stock ourselves or drop-ship to customers. When these items are drop-shipped, we would like to be able to change the Sales and COGS accounts to our drop shipping accounts. While we can change the sales account on the Sales Order for these items, we cannot find a location to overwrite the COGS account from the Purchase Order side of the process. It seems entirely driven by the Stock Items’ Posting Class, which is set to be the usual accounts as drop ship orders for these items are uncommon.Is there a way to specify the account of items on a Purchase Order/Receipt like there is on a Sales Order?

Hi Everyone We are having an issue with rounding up purchase quantity from required quantity on Purchase Order.  For exampleInventory Item: Metal Sheet (Each Sheet is 2.5 sqm)Base Unit: SQMPurchase Unit : EA“Qty Roundup” under manufacturing only applies to required quantity in base unit.  Say 12.9 sqm of metal sheet is required for a production order. It generates a Purchase Order for 5.16 sheets. (We need the Purchase Order to round up the quantity to an integer, in this case 6 sheets.)  We tried implementing lot size as 2.5 in both 1) inventory - replenishment and 2) bill of material - lot.It didn’t seem to work. Could you please suggest a solution? Is customisation the only way?  Thanks in advance. 

Hi everyone,I have a specific functionality implemented in one Acumatica Customization Project.Now, in another Customization Project, I need to reuse some of the functionality and DAC fields that were introduced in the first customization.What would be the recommended approach for this scenario?I would appreciate any recommendations or best practices for structuring customizations in this case.Thanks!

Hello,The “prepare tax report” and “release tax report” are showing different figures for the same entity and same period. Have anyone experienced this before?

Hi All,I need assistance with below:For one our clients, with regards to subaccount restrictions, we have already set and implemented the GL Account to subaccount pairing restrictions (through the GL Account Access) screen, and that works fine.Our subaccounts string are designed in such manner that they include ‘department’ segment specifications (as can be seen below first screenshot for the ENGINEERING department). So, now we want to restrict further using the ‘department segment’ in the subaccount string, such that when a User selects a DEPARTEMNT in the Requests screen (see 2nd screenshot), then on the subaccount column in the detail line, only subaccounts with the ‘ENG’ (Engineering) should show for the user to choose among them (i.e., automatically filter the subaccounts on the line by the department selected at the top). Is it possible to configure such restriction groups without using the GL Account itself/ the users themselves, through standard acumatica configuration?I have b

I'm setting up my first import scenario for cash transactions (CS.20.40.00). While I've successfully set up the provider and provider object, I'm encountering issues in the mapping section. The test import file prepares the lines perfectly, but the actual import returns multiple errors—here's the latest one. Could someone please share a screenshot of their scenario so I can compare and see where I am going wrong? 

Good afternoon, We recently upgraded from 25R1 to 25R2, and upon trying to create the LLM connection through Anthropic for Claude, we are getting the following error when trying to test the connection:“The max_completion_tokens parameter has an invalid value. Specify the correct value for this parameter on the LLM Connection form.”  Has anyone else experienced this error and is there a solution to fix it there is no field on the LLM Connection form.  Our partner did ask Acumatica about it, but their response leaves a lot to desire and provides no solution. 

Hi,I have a custom List screen with a grid and a LinkCommand that opens a document in another graph.I currently use:throw new PXRedirectRequiredException(graph, "Document"){ Mode = PXBaseRedirectException.WindowMode.Same};The document opens correctly, but the original List screen is replaced, so the user cannot easily navigate back.WindowMode.NewWindow opens the document in a new tab, which is also not what I want.What is the recommended Acumatica approach to open a document from a List/Grid screen while keeping the ability to navigate back to the original List screen?Thanks!

I am unable to export the Purchase Order Print Form. I logged in as the affected user and verified that the option is grayed out. I attempted to update the access rights, but the issue still persists.Could anyone please provide the steps required to enable the highlighted options shown in the second screenshot? 

Hello Team,We are using the PXPricingAnalysis package, which includes a Pricing Analysis smart panel popup action. When the popup is opened in the Classic UI, the grid applies specific row and cell colors based on the data.Currently, this coloring is handled in the graph using the `Page_Load` event. The implementation creates CSS styles using `PXStyle` and applies them to the `PXGrid` rows/cells through `RowDataBound`.Could anyone please guide us on the recommended way to implement this same row-level and cell-level coloring in Modern UI for this smart panel/grid?I have included the relevant Classic UI implementation below for reference.https://github.com/Acumatica/Acumatica-PricingAnalysis Thank you!

Hello,I was wondering if anyone knows if there is a resolution for this issue:The following error appears when attempting to create a shipment for an order for which the Sched. Shipment date is greater than the current date.This would be considered a bug to us, as there is no reason you should be prevented from shipping an order earlier than requested.This is a required field that is pre-populated from the SO Requested On field, and results in an additional unnecessary and confusing step of manually altering the scheduled shipment date to the current day before creating the shipment.We are shipping non-stock items, back order allowed, allow negative quantity, but that should not matter.I know this was previously a known issue but we are using 2023 R1 where it was supposedly resolved years ago  TYVM!Kyle

Hello, this is a message aimed at current Case Management customers,The CRM team is exploring a potential new AI feature for Acumatica CRM that automatically surfaces similar past cases, so support teams can find and locate solutions faster instead of solving the same problem from scratch every time. The goal is less manual digging, quicker resolutions, and more consistent answers across your team.To build this well, we want to test it against real-world data — so we're looking for a few community members with large, established case databases that make use of the Closure Notes functionality who'd be willing to work with us during early development. This would involve reviewing early versions and giving us direct feedback on relevance and usefulness of our findings.If you're interested (or just curious to learn more before committing), please reach me directly via DM — we'd love to chat. Thanks in advance to anyone willing to help shape this idea into reality. Best, The Acumatica CRM P

It's great that we have such a vibrant Acumatica community to get quick answers to questions and gain product knowledge! We have very active members jumping in to help others out all the time. The goal of the community is to respond to every member’s question so that no one goes away "empty handed".Connect, Learn, Share Don’t miss updates, subscribe to Community site discussions for weekly updates and Acumatica News & Updates for important news. Also, be sure to subscribe to you discussion forum of interest. Welcome to the AI/ML Community SpaceOver the past several months, we have heard from partners and customers across our ecosystem who share the same interest: a place to talk about AI at Acumatica, together. This space is our response to that, and we are glad to finally open it up.AI/ML Community Space Rohit Rattan - Acumatica Community Featured Member for August 2026Meet Rohit Rattan our Acumatica Community Featured Member for August 2026. It’s great to have you as part of the

Version 26.101.0225I’ve modified the Customers screen (AR303000) in Modern UI to add a detail grid to the Contact tab and to add some action buttons above the grids.In my development environment, everything looks as it should: When I publish this to the sandbox environment, two of the buttons are missing: Using F12 to view the source I can see that the missing PXActionState code is there. The button is simply not visible.How might I go about figuring out why it isn’t appearing?C# and TS code below: public PXAction<CRContact> ResetMagentoPassword;[PXButton(Category = "ECommerce")][PXUIField(DisplayName = "Reset Magento Password", MapEnableRights = PXCacheRights.Select, MapViewRights = PXCacheRights.Select)]...public PXAction<CRContact> CreateMagentoCustomer; [PXButton(Category = "ECommerce")][PXUIField(DisplayName = "Create Magento Cust.", MapEnableRights = PXCacheRights.Select, MapViewRights = PXCacheRights.Select)]...export interface ContactDetail_TPMagentoMods_generated e

Is there a way to “Close” inactive projects? When we updated there is now a “Close” option in projects after “Completing” a project. I’d like to close all of the projects we have complete that will allow me to “Close”. Is there a way I can mass close without going into each individual project?

Hello,I am trying to make the records on the Approvals screen scrollable on Modern UI, rather than going through pages using the Next button. The screen is scrollable in Classic UI by default, without any screen-level change.For this requirement, I added a TypeScript extension as below: import {    removeDecorator,    gridConfig,    GridPreset,    GridFilterBarVisibility,    GridNoteFilesShowMode,    GridPagerMode,} from "client-controls";import { EPApproval } from "src/screens/EP/EP503010/EP503010";export interface EPApproval_P24KEPApprovalsRecordsPerScreen_converted extends EPApproval {}@removeDecorator("gridConfig")@gridConfig({    preset: GridPreset.Processing,    showFilterBar: GridFilterBarVisibility.OnDemand,    allowUpdate: false,    showNoteFiles: GridNoteFilesShowMode.Suppress,    defaultAction: "EditDetail",    pagerMode: GridPagerMode.InfiniteScroll,    adjustPageSize: false,})export class EPApproval_P24KEPApprovalsRecordsPerScreen_converted {} But even after publishing the

When using Inter-Branch Accounting, the Due to/from entries don’t post until release. Then, the debits and credits are totalled for each branch pair and posted to the Balance Sheet. Is there any way to have the Due To/From for each individual line affected by the Inter-Branch Mapping?I’ve tried Detail/Summary posting on the COA with no success.

Has anyone tried ACUMATICA integration with Rippling HRIS for Asia region? Much appreciated for your information and sharing on how it worked also what are the challenges during implementation, Thank you

Have anyone can provide the Datawedge configuration to parse GS1 barcodes to Acumatica using a TC52/TC53 Zebra devices?

Is it possible to use product configurator in Disassembly production order. I tried to do it but system is not displaying the configurator information to that we have configurator for this item and I am able to create normal Production order with the configurator.  

Dear community,We are in the process of migrating Pivot Tables to the Modern UI and would like to collect some feedback and information about the usage scenarios.In the Classic UI, there is an option to create a pivot table directly from a GI as a GI’s tab or to go to the SM208010 Pivot Tables form and create a pivot table as a separate form with its own Screen ID and a menu item.Can you please share your usage scenarios for the second option? (pivot table as a standalone form)

Hi everyone! Anyone here who experience slow loading on 2024 R2 instance in general? My current version is Build 24.207.0011.

Hello,Could someone please help me understand why this screen is broken?There are no custom extensions or modifications applied to this screen, so I’m not sure what could be causing the issue.  

We upgraded our client to Prime from Advanced.Shortly after, we upgraded from 2024.1 to 2025.1We are experiencing extreme speed issues ever since.We have a case logged since 10.28.2025 but no resolution yet.Is anyone else experiencing slow down since upgrading either their license or version?I’d be interested to hear.Thank you.

All of my Sales Orders in the Details tab show <SPLIT> in the Sched. Shipment Date and are empty when checking Line Details. The Sales Order has a Sched. Shipment date entered in the Shipping tab and the Purchase Order has Promised On date entered. I’m trying to understand why they are always showing <SPLIT> instead of the dates provided?