Manufacturing

I need to advise the sales team regarding the availability of materials in the multilevel BOMs (Capable to Promise (CTP) multi-level BoM), which may include both Manufacturing and purchasing items at various levels. Any ideas on how to create a GI or even generate a report showing the INSiteStatus.QtyAvail using AMMultiLevelBomData?

Hi  I have been trying to set up CTP with a multi-level BoM and I am having some trouble. Does anyone know if CTP work with multi-level BoMs please? Thanks Matt 

I’m working with a customer who is setting up a fairly lengthy configurator for their industrial product. He discovered that if he missed an option for one of the features, and then adds it in under the Features form, that it will not pull this new option into the selection set within the maintenance for his configuration. He ends up having to delete the feature, and then add it back in and recreate all the rules associated with that feature. I did see that you can export options and rules, then import them again when you recreate which should help the situation.Has anyone else noticed this, and is there any other way to update the feature without having to remove it from the configuration. I tried using the refresh tool and that didn’t appear to pull in the new option. Thanks in advance for any assistance or suggestions.

i have role Admin and have full access rights to report. Report have one parameter: Please help me. All report in system when i selected  is no data availible parameter. I think it's a permissions issue. But I also have administrator access and access control for report.

Hello Has anyone seen this error? I added Mass Actions to a GI for Production Order Ticket, but when I try to mass edit them or even one, I get this error. I was looking to complete or cancel multiples at once.  

As shown in the screenshot below, we understand that when a Move transaction is performed, the system should create both: The Move Transaction, and The corresponding Cost Transaction. This is not the actual screenshot; it was taken from the local system. In our case, we can only see the yellow-highlighted Move transaction line. The Cost Transaction shown above does not appear in the Production Order. We have identified an issue where, after completing a Move transaction, the Cost Transaction is not being created for that specific Move.As a result, the system generates a WIP Adjustment Transaction when closing the Production Order instead.We reviewed two Production Orders for the same Item Code, and confirmed that both orders have the same Event History and appear to be configured identically.In one Production Order, the Move did generate a Cost Transaction, while in the other, it did not.There are also no Parent Production Orders associated with these cases, and the No project Associ

If a user does not have any previous Time Clock entries created in the browser, the mobile app does not have an option to + Add a new entry.I’ve seen demos in YouTube that show a + button to start new entries.We checked settings and user rights.The user can create new clock entries in the browser, but not in the app.Any suggestions? Thanks 

The action dates for the purchase items shown in the inventory planning display do not match, even though all the purchase items within the box are used to manufacture the same item for the same sales order. Additionally, no lead time is specified for these purchase items, and there is no available quantity in the warehouse. 

Hi All. Do you know why I get this error when linking the BOM in Production Order. The Production order was created from SO if that helps, but there were also 2 items in SO that was marked for Production and linking the BOM is fine without error. Can you please help? 

Hi everyone Just wondering if anyone else is experiencing this issue in Engineering Workbench and Visual BOM. In BOM, the Subassembly Item BOM is set to Revision B.But in Visual BOM and Engineering Workbench, it pulls in BOM Revision A. Is this intended behaviour of these two screens? Revision A is not the default BOM for the subassembly. Thanks for your input. 

HI, I would like to confirm the MRP configuration at the stock item level in line with the latest 2025 R1 updates. I have completed the configuration and tested a few MRP cycles, which are attached for your reference.Could you please help confirm whether the configured process flows are aligned with the expected standard behavior? Additionally, I would appreciate clarification on a few questions related to the results observed during testing.  

Hello.  has anyone ever seen this error? First time I’ve seen it.  It came up after completing a refresh to our test environment from production and rolling costs.  

Hello,We keep getting this error when trying to Issue Materials.This is happening for all finished products we are making using the item 00029049, regardless of lot. We had previously made production orders using this item numerous dozens of times before, most recently just four months ago. As I have highlighted, we have sufficient qty. On Hand, Available and Available for Shipping (we also have an equal amount as Available for Issue).There is no qty. allocated:We have checked the BOM and it is OK.We have deleted and recreated the Production Orders (using various lots we have on hand to see if it was truly a warehouse, warehouse location or allocation issue - it is not).The warehouse location allows sales. The location is the Default Issue From location for thousands of other items with no problem.The stock item is Active.We have Recalculated Inventory.This seems totally random and nothing we have done is fixing it. We are well versed with production orders and how they work, including

Does anyone know of a tool to mass update/copy/populate BOMs or Production Orders? My company is an engineer-to-order business that manufacture custom products under 4-5 product lines. For instance, Product Line #1 can have a seemingly infinite number of one-off configurations. To capture these types of products we typically use an “empty” BOM with just the routing and use the production order as the document where the BOM gets filled out (combined effort from estimating/project management/engineering departments). However, our end users are facing some difficulty with the time it takes to populate / mass-update production orders. For instance, we typically see sales orders of 80-100 repeatable (or non-repeatable which takes longer) one-off products that all fall under the same product line. These are specific to the customer and do not all ship at the same time so we choose to break them up by the ship date. So typically we would see a Sales Order with 80-100 individual lines since th

Hi Community,I’m looking to get your thoughts on ETO manufacturing and custom-built subassemblies.  Our client does a tremendous amount of Engineer-to-Order manufacturing.  In many cases, their solutions may ultimately be built once, which may also include a reasonably large portion of their subassemblies, such as laser-cut sheet metal parts.  The custom products and subassemblies often fit nicely into a handful of product classes, but in their current state, they are often creating new SKUs for ETO product and subassembly.  These parts are virtually never in inventory beyond the time necessary to issue them to a production order or ship the FG to the customer.  The client will be using CADLink, which will be used to generate SKUs, BOMs, and to update Production Orders. We can continue down this path, which is fine.  With that said, it feels as though there could be some potential benefit of creating skeleton SKUs and BOMs representing generic versions of these products. This is a solu

Has anyone developed a system where the move transaction can be done in batches similar to how the materials wizard functions? We release materials when a production order is completed in house so we do the materials and move transaction one right after the other. The materials wizard allows us to release materials for dozens of production orders if needed, but now we need that same functionality but for the move transactions.

I am looking for a way to add dock-to-stock period into MRP planning (does not need to be part number specific, can be one stock period for all parts) so we get a purchase part in a day or two before our schedule actually shows we need it. Lead time additions will just order the part earlier, not bring it in earlier. Anyone else have a solution to this? I feel like it's right there in front of me, but can’t seem to locate the solution. 

Cannot delete revision nor choose which revision from which to copy to a new revisionIn the product configurator module, I made a new revision (AF) on CFG0000030, but in doing so, I made a sizable error that I cannot easily undo. What I want to do is delete revision AF, go back to revision AE, and have that be the basis for yet another revision for the rest of the edits I need to make. However, the system does not allow me to delete revision AF. I can only inactivate it. If I do this, AF remains the basis for the new revision (call it ‘AG’). Is there anything I can do here?

I’ve done many different import scenarios and regularly make mass changes to our item configurations as we’re preparing for go-live with Acumatica Manufacturing and finalizing how everything will need to be structured. However, I’ve run into this problem that I can’t resolve.We have about 600 configurable items, each with close to 200 lines of options, so making any changes manually is really not an option.Currently, all the configurations are set to revision “0” and are in the pending status, so I can make any needed updates with an import scenario. However, once we are live with this, we’ll need to increment the revision number on all the configurations whenever there is a change, which happens frequently.I’ve attached a screenshot of my update scenario mapping below. The line circled in red is the one that is causing the error. I’m simply trying to take the value from the data provider and increment it by 1. The error that it throws is“Error: 'BOM ID' cannot be empty. Error: 'BOM Re

Hello!I was wondering if anyone had this issue when using this setting on the Production Order Types screen.I turned this on to better track our subassemblies so everything can be categorized under the parent production order #. But what’s weird is that it causes the Production Order # to skip a bunch of iterations, seemingly at random.See below for a screenshot. These were all Production Orders that were created within the last ~5 days. And I am certain that there is no way that someone created around 7000 Production Orders only to delete them in that timeframe.For some reason it jumps from POP027009-000 → POP027746-000 all the way to the most recent which is POP037933-000. And in this screenshot, the earliest production order (POP027009-000) to the most recent (POP037933-000) jumps over 10,000 iterations. Prior to turning this setting on the numbering sequence worked as intended. Is there something conflicting between this setting and the numbering sequence? Does anyone know why this

Where do you guys download device hub? 

Here is the scenarioAllow Preassigning Lot/Serial Numbers flag is flagged in Production Order type screenLot/Serial Class created with assignment method “When Received”Serial number is pre-assigned to the Parent FG : Example SER0001. when the production order was created.FG has 3 sub assemblies..  Assembly 1Assembly 2Assembly 3 When the assembly is produced - the same serial number generated for the parent unit (SER0001) should be reused/assigned for each assembly Item when it it moved. Has anyone come across this scenario? Any thoughts or insights? 

Hi, client has several Operation .Is there a way to restrict certain users from entering a Move trx for certain Operations or Workcenters? I tried RowData Security, no option for WorkCenters;  but I tried to use the Warehouse linked to the WorkCenter;  but it did not work. Business Case.  Op worker entering movement for the WC he is working and not a different workcenter.ie,  Assembly vs Packing vs Quality Control.

I have production orders that span multiple months, but the Qty to Produce is just 1 unit (e.g., large machinery or equipment). Since Acumatica only posts overhead at the time of the final move, all overhead gets booked in a single month — even though the production activity and costs are spread across multiple months.This creates challenges in monthly financial reporting, as it overstates costs in one month and understates them in the others.

I created a new screen that has workflow code on it. i followed the T270 series to make it. I am having issues with disabling an action conditionally. I want the “Remove Hold” button to be disabled whenever a line item is added that has a “Stock Replenishment Type” of “Manufacture” and the Bar ID is null. In the below picture, the removed hold button should be disabled because line 1 and 3 are empty in the bar id. i have the field conditionally required, but it will still put it on hold even though an error will pop up saying that the field has to be filled out. i tried adding it in a row selected event. i also tried to do it in the workflow. but it doesnt ever get disabled. can someone tell me what i am doing wrong?protected void _(Events.RowSelected<ProtoCutLine> e, PXCache cache){    ProtoCutLine row = e.Row;    ProtoCut lineitems = SelectFrom<ProtoCut>.Where<ProtoCut.orderID.IsEqual<ProtoCutLine.orderID.FromCurrent>>.View.Select(this);    if (lineitems.Statu