Distribution

I work for a metal service center selling corrosion-resistant metals products. If you are running Acumatica and work for a metal service center, please let me know I’d love to discuss with you! Thanks, Jonathan

I need to ship a Non-Stock Kit from multiple warehouses. Each component is in its own warehouse and I want to ship it directly from that warehouse without transfering it to the other.I am using the Multiple Warehouse feature of 24R2.I have 2 warehouses set up:W1 - Warehouse 1W2 - Warehouse 2Consider a Non-Stock Item Kit (NSK1) with 2 components. The qty avail for each component exists only at its default warehouse.COMP1 - Component 1 w/ default warehouse W1COMP2 - Component 2 w/ default warehouse W2When adding item NSK1 to a Sales Order you must choose a Warehouse. Selecting either W1 or W2 will not allow a Shipment to be created because "There is no stock available at the W1 warehouse for the COMP2 item" (or vice-versa). Batch processing orders to Create Shipments results in the same error in the trace log.Is it possible to ship components of a non-stock kit item from multiple warehouses?

I want to create a customer by passing the Numbering seq. The customer number CS0225. Attached are the Numbers currently we have space to add the mentioned. How ever when I checked the Manual Numbering seq and advise the team member to proceed of the customer creation, we are unable to process 

Is it possible to add the list of items that need to be counted from the online version to the mobile Scan and Count? Our team is basically counting blind not knowing what needs to be counted and where those parts are. Ideally, we wouldn’t have to use a computer to do a cycle count. 

 Hi,I’m trying to make the CustomerID selector field display as a hyperlink in the Modern UI, but it is not showing up as expected. Below is my code snippet. Could anyone help me identify what I might be missing or how to make it work?Code:DAC:#region CustomerID[PXDBInt()][PXUIField(DisplayName = "Customer ID",Enabled =false)][PXSelector(typeof(Search<BAccount.bAccountID,Where<BAccount.type,Equal<BAccountType.customerType>>>),    SubstituteKey = typeof(BAccount.acctCD),    DescriptionField = typeof(BAccount.acctName))]public virtual int? CustomerID { get; set; }public abstract class customerID : PX.Data.BQL.BqlInt.Field<customerID> { }#endregionHTML:<template>                    <field name="CustomerID" config-allow-edit.bind="true"></field></template>I also tried by adding config-type.bind="1" Thanks in advance.Premalatha N

Hey there,we do have the issue, that we have open orders for the same customer and want to merge the shipment.So for example customer 1 has 3 open orders and in each order are some items which are available in the warehouse and can be shipped. Now i want to have only one shipment for those items.Also possible is that we have a customer with 2 open orders and all items are available and should be send in only one shipment. Any ideas how i can do this? At the moment i have to create for each order a shipment.

We changed a stock item's posting class. One year later, it still uses the GL defined in the old one. Why?  The item and posting class Gl accounts are defined with the new accounts.  I’ve looked at the bill of material, the sales order, warehouse, location.  Nothing suggests that the old accounts should be hit.  This is happening for issues out of the warehouse but does not appear to affect receipts.

When I create credit return it show the error message like this.

Hello all,I would like to confirm whether it is a native Acumatica functionality that when a metafield in Shopify is not mapped in Acumatica, any data exported from Acumatica to Shopify will result in a blank value being passed to that unmapped metafield, even if there is data present in the corresponding field?Thanks.

Hello, We’ve been using Acumatica WMS for about two years now. We were initially excited about the picking functionality—using a smartphone via the Acumatica app, or a handheld scanner—but it has not lived up to our expectations. I’m curious if anyone is having success? Here are our pain points: In order to pick via the handheld, you also need a printed picking worksheet to know where to go and what to pick. Using the Review screen during the pick is inefficient to look back-and-forth between. I wish the picking screen would tell you more about where to go, what SKUs and quantities to pick, rather than leaving you “blind” to that information.  It is therefore much easier for our team to just use the printed picking worksheet to pick orders. Using the handheld takes much longer.  As far as I know there’s no way to simply mark a picking worksheet as “picked” in Acumatica. You have to actually scan everything (which takes forever). Therefore our team just deletes the picking worksheet aft

Hello,I am trying to drop ship an item that is serial tracked.  I have checked the Required for Drop-ship box in the Lot/Serial Class. I still cannot open Line Details to enter the serial number on the Sales Order screen, and get this error. The first place I can enter a serial number is on the Purchase Receipt. Is there a way to enter the serial number on the Sales Order screen for a drop ship item?

Has anyone integrated apple email to Acumatica 

I am testing Seasonality Replenishment The help is a bit vague - it says useed to reduce of increase repl qtyI am finding the factor shown below is reducing the repl qty Is this correct ?  

When we try to export the line details from the Sales Order Entry screen we get an error:  Object reference not set to an instance of an object.  Is there a way to correct this?Thank you 

Hello all,Is there something we can follow to mark contacts a primary for customers? Each customer has one contact & I’m looking to mark them as primary for all those customers.  How can we do that?

What is the best source of documentation and training on setting up seasonality is replenishment ?Thank you  

Anyone ever have a scenario on how to set a specific quantity limit in a warehouse location? For example this specific shelf can only hold up to a quantity of 5 items. There's nothing to set that as of now, you can set locations to have primary items...but no limits to the number of items a location can hold.  

Hi,I need track the COGS and Sales for a specific customer . I was looking for a way to set up the COGS and sales account to be picked based on this specific customer.This seems  not possible with the available options and I identified one issue which is if we have set up the posting class to pick the sales account by the inventory and also we have a different sales account in the customer’s GL accounts, the system always picks the account from the Inventory ID. How can I set the priority to pick the account entered in the customer rather than picking it from inventory ID?Further, I can check the sales for the specific customer in the sales account, since in the account details customer is available. I can filter and see. But in the COGS account, the business account is not available. I will be able to create a GI to connect and show the customer for COGS transactions but Do you see any other options to see the COGS for a specific customer?Thank You,Dulanjana 

Dennis Henry, ControllerI recently migrated from Sage 500 To Acumatica and we installed the SalesOrderTypeDefaultReasonCode module from github. Adding default reason code by sales order enables you to set default sales and sub GLs when a reason code is for each sales order.  For example all of our sales service reps orders use the CSRSO which sets a default sales gl account and default sales sub account to 40010 and 11 respectively.PROBLEM: Most sales orders with their associated reason codes work just fine. However in some instances the system appears to ignore the reason code defaults.  And it most cases it completely ignores the reason codes’ sub defaults.  See attached images 1-5.  Any assistance would be appreciated. I created an issue on github weeks ago but no answer.Order Type = SO - SSR- Use Sales Account From: Reason Code- Combine Sales Sub. From: RRRRRRRRRR Reason Code =  CSRS0- Usage: Sales- Sales Account: 40010 - Sales SSR- Sales Sub: 11 - Sales, SSRSales Order = SO0005296

We recently upgraded from 23R1 to 25R1.  A sidepanel added in 24R1 is something we’ve been looking forward to--the new “Related Return Documents” in Sales Orders.Unfortunately only our Admin role seems to have access to the sidepanel.  When I look at roles like our SO Clerk and drill down to Sales Orders, Sales Orders, Sales Order (where the sidepanel security lives), it shows that security is inherited.  If I open a user in that role in the “Access Rights by User” screen and drill down, the specific security listed for that sidepanel is “Edit”.  My guess is that either the change from implied Granted security (which was the way 23R1 worked) to Implied Revoked security is causing this, or there may be an actual “Related Return Documents” screen (like with the Stock Items sidepanels) that I need to grant access to.  I’m hoping to grant everyone in the company access to this sidepanel--all of our users have at least View access to the Sales Orders screen.

I would like to grouped sales by parent/child in generic inquiry to use in a dashboard table. Can someone help with this?

Hi Team,ChatGPT said:I was working on an import scenario to create stock items and encountered the following error during processing:“Account 400100 is a control account for PO, and posting to it is prohibited. Please select a non-control account.”To resolve this, I updated the Chart of Accounts by adding the PO module for account 400100 and enabling Manual Entry.After making these changes, the import processed further but displayed the following warning:“Account 400100 is a control account for PO. Although posting to this account is allowed, we recommend that you select a non-control account.”I’ve attached a screenshot for reference.Could you please help me resolve this issue or suggest any configuration changes needed?

We are in the processe of implmentation and I am exploring the Blanket Sales Order functionality and have run into what I belive is an issue related to the “Requested On Date” on the Blanket Order Type.When creating a blanket order you can define the “Requested on Date” for the line item in the Details table (had to add this column),  however when you go to Line Details,  you can only define the “Sched Shipment Date” for each line, not the Requested On Date.      Additionally I have discovered that when creating Child Orders from the Blanket order,  the “Requested On Date” on the Child Sales Order defaults to the Current Date regardless of what is set on the Blanket Order.  I have also observed that the “Scheduled Shipment Date” on the Child Sales Order defaults to the “Scheduled Ship Date” minus the defined number of Lead Time days set on the customer record, which is how I would expect it to behave.My conclusion is that setting the “Requested On Date” and “Scheduled Ship Date” in the

Is there a setting or other method to restrict item purchasing ONLY to vendors listed for an item AND marked as “active”? I’d like to be able to turn on/off the ability to use a vendor for specific parts. In this instance, we are creating the POs manually, not via automation. Currently, I can create a PO for any part and any vendor, which has led to some mistakes. Ideas?

We have a customer that prefers us to master pack--packing several small boxes into a single larger box--so they don’t receive so many individual packages.Here’s our current process:In Acumatica, we pack everything into small boxes (for example, a box with carton ID C01) and enter the contents and weight for each small box. We can usually fit about six C01 boxes into one larger box, a C08. We then move to ShipRush (third-party shipping software), where we enter the dimensions for the large/master box (the C08), generate the FedEx shipping labels, and manually add the master box with the tracking numbers back into the shipment in Acumatica. In Acumatica, we use a dummy Ship Via (ShipRush FedEx), instead of FedEx Ground, so it doesn’t automatically populate tracking numbers.This method works, but it feels clunky.My question:Is there a way to master pack directly in Acumatica without relying on ShipRush? For example: could we create a special carton ID (like “CIP”-carton inner pack) and h