Discussion Forums

Hi there everyone,We recently upgraded to 26R1. When using the Inventory summary screen, we noticed that double clicking one of the lines does not always apply the correct filters when sending us to the Inventory Allocation Details screen. Typically when doubly clicking a line in Inventory Summary it will send us to Inventory Allocation Details with the filter for the Warehouse and Location already matching that of the line we clicked on.  Now however, majority of the time it will instead only send the filter results for whatever row was at the top of the Inventory Summary results.  Once in a blue moon it will apply the right filter settings, but typically it does not. Has anybody else experienced this?

We're working on an Inventory Aging Report as a standard feature in Acumatica, and we want to make sure we build it the right way.We already published a survey in the related idea:A big thank you to everyone who has already responded! In case you missed it, here's the Survey link.Your input is invaluable — we'd really appreciate hearing from you!

We have some items that require a core return.  We ship out the new item and include a return label for the return of the core.  We generate the return label in Shipstation, tied to the order/shipment of the new item going out.Shipstation sends back the UPS tracker for the outbound box, but I’m not seeing anything that also has the tracker for the return label.  I’m guessing it doesn’t come back into Acumatica, but I thought I’d see if anyone else may know.

Hi AllI’m seeking advice from the community on which is the better way to delete tenants from Acumatica.My setup is PCS running 25R1. Is it better to use  Acumatica Configuration an choose Perform Database Maintenance and delete the tenants there or to delete the tenants from within the application itself?Also, will there have to be any reindexing of the database after deleting tenants?Thanks in advance.Amit

Since the ConfirmShipment() method now has a new signature with ConfirmShipmentArgs replacing all the old parameters, how do I get the Action<SOOrderEntry, SOShipment> baseConfirmShipment?  I need to call the base action but I don’t know how to get the PXAdapter or delegate needed to call it. Here’s what I have so far (the last code line ConfirmShipmentAction() is giving me errors)...    public class PaymentValidationSOShipmentConfirmExt : PXGraphExtension<ConfirmShipmentExtension, SOShipmentEntry>    {        private void ValidateTotalEachSO(SOShipLine soShipLine, bool createShipment)        {...        ...}        #region ConfirmShipmentAction        public delegate IEnumerable ConfirmShipmentActionDelegate(PXAdapter adapter);        [PXOverride]        public IEnumerable ConfirmShipmentAction(PXAdapter adapter, ConfirmShipmentActionDelegate baseMethod)        {            // Custom Logic before              var result = baseMethod(adapter);            // Custom Logic aft

How do I handle this issue using Receive and Put away 25R2 Purchase Pref Default Rec Qty = Open QTY enter PO on Rec & Put Away Receipt is created  Note - PO is more than 15 lines so lines do not populate scan first item with qty 3 open for serialized item prompted for lot serial enter serial number  error below when I hit OK 4 lines display not 3 and end up with 4 received error : The Receive mode is in use.The scanned quantity exceeds the quantity in the BP108849 PO receipt for the 3M.33633 item.Confirm receiving 3M.33633 x 1 EA. The following quantity of the item will be added to a receipt line that is not linked to a purchase order: 1 EA. To confirm, click OK.

Is anyone currently using ProNest with Data Sync integrated into Acumatica? If so, I'd be interested in hearing about your experience:How well does the integration work? What data are you exchanging between the systems? Did you use a standard connector, an Acumatica partner, or build the integration yourselves? How difficult was the implementation? Are there any limitations or issues you wish you had known about before starting?We're trying to understand what a typical implementation looks like and what level of effort to expect before moving forward.Thanks in advance for any insights.

Hi all.Currently, the system uses the “Available” quantity to validate stock when creating a Sales Order. As a result, a warning message is triggered when there is insufficient “Available” stock (please refer to the attached screenshot). However, the internal process is based on the “Available to Ship” quantity rather than “Available”.Could you please confirm if it is possible to modify the warning logic to reference “Available to Ship” instead of “Available”? This would ensure the system behavior aligns with our operational workflow.I have tried it adjust this with “Availability Calculation Rules” but was unsuccessful.Appreciate your guidance on this.Thanks in advance!

Hello all,I have created 3 SOs for the same customers on different dates. I then created a single Shipment for those 3 SOs but upon creating an invoice, from the Shipments screen, it create 3 individual invoices. i did check under the order Types, Bill Separately checkbox is inactive.Not only this when the other day I created another set of SO for another customer, 3 SOs → 1 Shipment, it generate 2 invoices from the single shipment for 3 SOs. What could be the other reason for so?Any thoughts?

Not sure if I am allow to ask this here, but does anybody have an original/slightly modified customer statement report that they would be willing to share?We had a firm do some work for us because we wanted an accompanying copy of all invoices included in the statement report, but now we have lost the ability to show a summary. The automation process for generating and emailing these statements yields a mess of a “statement” and then the invoices. Rather than pay money to have them fix it, I think I would rather have something at least similar to Acumatica’s out of the box report and try to embed the invoices myself. Any other advice would be appreciated!

I was hoping to add the ability to filter by SOLine.InventoryID_description in the Sales Order Details by Customer report, but for the life of me i can’t get this field as an option. Following what online tips i could find I added this field to the Viewer Fields in the schema browser. Then I also placed it in the groupDetails section on the report itself at another recommendation. Every other writeup i can find is either putting it in as a parameter or a sorting option, neither of which is what im looking for.End result, our staff wants to be able to sort this report by keywords in the item description. Sales Order Details by Inventory Item doesnt work for us in this case because its layout is item-first instead of customer-first.I have my fingers crossed this is something simple im just not seeing as i don’t spend alot of time in report designer.

I have a contact that I have marked inactive.  Yet when try to send an email and I start typing, the autocomplete still shows that inactive contact.  Also if I click on the lookup on the “To” line of the email activity the inactive contact appears there as well.I know you can turn off autocomplete under the user profile, but I do want autocomplete on.   Is there a way to remove past autocomplete entries so it “Forgets” the contact which is now inactive who I may have emailed before? Is there a way to change the Lookup so that Inactive Contacts are not listed?Seems like code(logic) should filter out inactive contacts. 

Good morning,    Does anyone know how to add multiple signatures to a Cash Account?  

Hello,We’ve been live in Acumatica for just over a month now and are running into some questions surrounding the MTO process. In short, inventory has been tied to a sales order as we expect in the MTO process. However, in some cases we’d like to remove the inventory allocation.If we go to the sales order and uncheck the Mark for Production box, that doesn’t seem to be removing the inventory allocated to the sales order. I understand the inventory was probably reserved during the sales order create process.Is there another process we aren’t aware of to remove the inventory allocation link to an existing sales order?

Meet Mark De Castro our Acumatica Community Featured Member for June 2026. It’s great to have you as part of the Acumatica Community ​@MarkD!Hi everyone! I'm based in the Philippines and have been working in the corporate world for nearly 8 years. My career started in customer service, where I spent 2 years developing strong communication and problem-solving skills before transitioning into ERP consulting.For the past 6 years, I've been helping businesses improve their processes through ERP solutions. I began as an SAP Business One Consultant in the Philippines and later moved into the Acumatica ecosystem, where I've been involved in both support and implementation projects for Australian clients.What I enjoy most about my work is solving business challenges, learning from different industries, and building relationships with clients and fellow professionals. Being part of the Acumatica Community has also given me opportunities to connect with talented people who share the same passion

Hello all,I would like to know if we can prevent de-duplication or inserting/saving of incorrect keywords. For instance there might be an item ID = LAPTOP, and any other employee would go ahead and create a same item but with incorrect keyword = LEPTOP. How can we prevent such scenarios in Acumatica?

Hi all. I have multiselector attribute. I need show attribute value in my other view like this show in Attribute tab. For example: When valueID and description is fill  i need show description, when description is null i need show valueID

We have a prospect that has two companies, one base in ROI and one based the UK. The 2nd ROI company does not hold any stock and all sales orders are supplied by the primary UK company. We’ve worked through using intercompany and believe it would work for them to a degree but ideally we would like the Intercompany Sales Order in the UK company to be dispatched to the customer address for the ROI company. If we select to raise the intercompany PO from the ROI company to the UK company as a drop ship PO, we cannot seem to generate the intercompany SO from the “Generate Intercompany Sales Orders” process within the UK company. This means the ROI company would have to theoretically “Receipt” the stock to their ROI warehouse to immediately despatch their customer sales order. This adds another level of admin the customer would like to avoid as they would like the paperwork from the UK company to have to delivery address of the ROI company customer. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 

I have not experienced this before.  I am logged in as ADMIN with customizer etc. roles.I cannot get anything to come up in the DAC browser.This is just an example.  I cannot open any DAC.Click here: 

Hi everyone,I am troubleshooting an issue in Acumatica where certain Contact records time out when opening the Contact entry screen.The Contacts list screen had a separate Generic Inquiry issue, which I was able to correct. The GI had an invalid condition:Contact.UsrCustomerLocationID <> MAINUsrCustomerLocationID is an integer/custom LocationID field, while MAIN is the LocationCD/substitute key. I corrected the GI by joining the Location table to Contact using:Contact.UsrCustomerLocationID = Location.LocationIDContact.BAccountID = Location.BAccountIDThen I changed the condition to:Location.LocationCD <> MAINAfter that, the Contacts list screen started loading correctly.However, I am still getting timeout errors when opening certain Contact records directly on the Contact entry screen. The screen opens blank and then throws an execution timeout. The trace points to Acumatica duplicate validation / duplicate entity loading:Microsoft.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Execution Time

Hallowe are currently working on the integration of 25R1. On the payment Receipt Form AR643000 in AR Modul the look up window Reference Nbr. does not show the list of the released payments which could be printed. is this intentional or is it a bug?

When a customer has an overpayment on account can that overpayment be turned into a credit memo?  I need an action to  show the customer the credit on account and remove the payment sitting open.

Our inventory items are valuated via FIFO. I have some items that ended up getting a $0 unit cost, but those items are layer #2 in our cost layers and I’m unsure about what I need to do in order to change that unit cost. For items where the $0 was the first layer I could just issue out the item and do a receipt with the new unit cost. Yes, I am aware that it would move that cost layer down to the bottom of the list which is okay in this scenario.If I need to change the second layer do I need to do 2 lines in my issue, remove enough inventory to relieve the first layer and then do a second line that issues out the 2nd layer, and on the receipt receive enough that mimics the first layer at the original unit cost and then a second line that has the adjusted unit cost?I have read that it is recommended to do adjustments to change unit costs but I find that those changes are not reflected in the cost layers GI.

We are using the “cost projection by date” feature in 2026R1 to forecast WIP and Over Billings.  It is a very useful tool.  However, to match our month end, it would be beneficial to use to use the post period as the cut off for transactions rather than the invoice date.  Sometimes the post period does not match the invoice date as a result of month end accruals.   By not matching the post period with our month end it causes errors in our WIP and Over Billing calculations.   Is there a way to change the cut off to post period rather than invoice date within Cost Projection By Date?

Is Acumatica doing away with direct carrier integrations? (We’ve always used our own UPS account and a stamps.com account for USPS.) We recently were told that we need to switch to an Easypost account.  However, everything I see online only talks about Acumatica discontinuing direct integration with FedEx..Easypost hasn’t been an easy transition, yet.  It’s been a week and I’m still waiting for an email reply from tech support.We’ve also had issues adding funds (taking 5 days to post.) I’m just wondering if acumatica is in fact stopping direct integration with UPS/Stamps? Thanks..