Discussion Forums

We have a custom warehouse operations web application that integrates with Acumatica via the REST Contract-Based API. The app has its own user authentication system with individual named users (warehouse staff, receiving clerks, etc.). All API calls from our app currently go through a single shared service account, so every receipt, transfer, and AP bill created in Acumatica shows the same username in audit logs - we lose individual attribution entirely.We are aware of Option 1 - storing each user's Acumatica credentials in our system and logging in as them individually for each operation. This is the obvious solution but comes with real tradeoffs: every warehouse user needs an Acumatica license seat, credential storage and session management gets complex, and we'd need to manage separate Acumatica sessions per app user.Our question: Is there a supported or recommended approach in Acumatica to pass the identity of the originating user through API calls made by a service account, withou

Hi Acumatica Community,S4 Consulting is pleased to share that we are providing a Free Vietnamese Language Pack for Acumatica ERP for Acumatica users and implementation partners working with Vietnamese teams. Our Vietnamese Language Pack included:Menus, screens, and key business fields Standardized Vietnamese business terminology Support for both Web and Mobile interfacesWe are also happy to support Acumatica partners who have projects in Vietnam and need a practical localization option for their customers.You can view the full details here:https://s4.com.vn/en/vietnamese-language-pack-for-acumatica-erp/Thank you.

Hi Acumatica Community,I’d like to share a resource dedicated to Acumatica in Vietnam:https://acuerp.vn/This is a Vietnamese blog focused on practical Acumatica usage, built to support both businesses and consultants working in a local context.The main goal is straightforward:– Help companies understand how Acumatica fits real operations before implementation– Share hands-on configuration, customization, and deployment experience– Provide practical use cases instead of generic documentationKey highlights:– Content tailored to Vietnamese business environments (finance, distribution, construction, F&B)– Real implementation scenarios from actual projects– Guidance on system setup, workflows, and data structure– Insights into applying Acumatica for cost control and operational efficiencyIn many ERP projects in Vietnam, the challenge is not the software itself, but how to adapt it correctly to local business models. This blog focuses on solving that problem with real-world experience.Th

Hey Everyone, I heard of an update to Chrome that will deprecate XSLT. Long Story Short - Classic UI screens will break November 17, 2026 onward. https://developer.chrome.com/docs/web-platform/deprecating-xsltThe only workaround at the time is to use Firefox Browser (or other non-chromium browsers) or use an older version of Chrome / Edge. I believe Acumatica is working on a patch / workaround for earlier versions of Acumatica (that don’t have modern UI). Important update to keep on your radar less your Thanksgiving gets ruined 😅This adds an urgency to update screens to Modern UI. I’m not sure whether screens will crash or loose functionality. I’m going to try to manually turn-off XSLT to see how screens respond.  Stay tuned in case any fix becomes available. 

It's great that we have such a vibrant Acumatica community to get quick answers to questions and gain product knowledge! We have very active members jumping in to help others out all the time. The goal of the community is to respond to every member’s question so that no one goes away "empty handed".Connect, Learn, Share Karthik Gajendran - Acumatica Community Featured Member for April 2026Meet Karthik Gajendran our Acumatica Community Featured Member for April 2026. It’s great to have you as part of the Acumatica Community ​@KarthikGajendran! Acumatica Community Webinar - Data by Design II: Take Acumatica’s Report Designer to the Next Level - April 21, 2026 - RecordingReady to go beyond the basics? This intermediate session builds on Data by Design. If you’re comfortable modifying reports and working with data, it’s time to unlock more advanced capabilities that give you greater control and flexibility. Acumatica User GroupsNew! NorCal Acumatica User Group, Distribution Customer User G

We redesigned the PO641000 form and are able to print from Printed forms, but not from the actual Purchase Order on Screen PO301000.  We are using 2025 R1 which has still the classic UI.  Just went down an AI wormhole and still could not get a solution. All tips greatly appreciated.  

Hi All,I am trying to get OpenOrderQty to show on a GI that is based on Purchase Receipts screen. I have linked POReceipt to POReceiptLine as per DAC Table, however the value for OpenOrder QTY does not show up.If someone can let me know what is missing in order to make this work, it would be wonderful.Kind regards,Calvin Law

Hey Guys,I need a little help, i have a back order report im pretty sure i found on here. ive made some changes, but i’d really like to show the expected dates for the items. Im having trouble relating tables todo so. Is it as simple as adding PO.POrder to the table then adding a relation? the relations confuse me.  

I am trying to adjust a field so that the input is masked like a password field. I have it in my classic UI customization, but I am unable to find any resources for implementing this in the modern UI.The field in question is a base field on an Acumatica page. The field is the “Header Value” field in the “Push Notifications” page SM302000. I have two questions:The first is what and where do I add modifications to adjust this field to be masked as a password? Do I adjust the DAC definition for the modern UI, do I adjust the view definition of this field in an extension .ts file, and/or do I create an html extension field that modifies it?The second question is what would that syntax look like? What specifically do I need to add to create the password masking?I did try to look for examples within the provided Acumatica code, but was unable to find any examples.

Is there a way to map Tracking URL field on the PACKAGES tab of a Shipment to Shopify Tracking URL field?I see this field in the mapping: However, in the ERP Object / ERP Field / Value, I don’t see anything representing this field: 

I am currently working with an Acumatica demo instance and planning to integrate with it via the API (Web service endpoints). Could you please provide information on the following:1. API rate limit — what is the maximum number of API calls permitted per minute?2. Concurrent calls — how many parallel API calls can be made by the same user at the same time?3. Transaction limit — is there a monthly cap on the number of transactions that can be created in the demo instance?Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Here is a real world scenario that I have experienced many times. In this actual case there are obvious low process maturity issues here - company leadership, change management and job roles and responsibilities not being followed.  Not looking to discuss or debate those issues as that is internal to the company to resolve, rather experiences and outcomes, ease of use and lowering friction to increase user adoption on Acumatica processes that are stated to have too many clicks and are too rigid from a customers point of view.CustomerThe customer is a mid-market utility/civil contractor running Acumatica Construction Edition with a major disconnect between what the PO-to-payment process requires and what Project Managers are actually willing to do.The Designed Process1. PM creates POs for materials, rentals, fuel, equipment, etc., (all non-stock items)2. Materials are delivered to the job site3. PM enters a Purchase Receipt against the PO confirming what was delivered4. Accounting recei

I am having issues with adding a custom screen to the mobile app. The screen is a form tab with grid in the detail section. I want to have a few fields from the header show up and then a couple of fields from the grid to show up. The layout that I want it to look like is the first screen shot. I have the “Sign” action added in but it doesnt work for some reason and the “Paper clip” for attachments isnt showing up. If I remove the “layout = “HeaderSimple” from my code, the attachment paper clip shows up and the action works, but the fields in the header no longer show up (second screen shot). Any ideas on what I did wrong? This is my first time adding to the mobile app. I was looking at the documentation when I made it, but I can’t seem to get it right.add screen PTM00013 { add container "BOLHead" { add layout "BOLheader1"{ layout = "HeaderSimple" add layout "HeaderRow1"{ layout = "Inline" add field "BillOfLadingNumber" add field "Status" }

acuminator-mcp: Acuminator as an MCP servercontou-consulting/acuminator-mcp: Acuminator MCP ServerAcuminator is the Roslyn analyzer that ships with Acumatica. acuminator-mcp exposes it over MCP so AI assistants (Claude Code, Cursor, etc.) can run it against their own output.Three tools:analyze_project runs Acuminator against a .csproj or .sln, returns diagnostics as code, file, line, column, project. analyze_snippet analyzes a raw C# snippet against a reference project (auto-discovered from the working directory). get_diagnostic_docs fetches the official docs for a PXNNNN code.Diagnostic messages are omitted on purpose. The code is the handle, the agent looks up details when it needs them. All three tools are marked read-only so auto-approve runs them without prompting.InstallWindows, .NET Framework 4.8 (the runner is net48 only, auto-downloaded on first use), Python 3.10+, pipx.pipx install git+https://github.com/contou-consulting/acuminator-mcp.git@v0.1.1claude mcp add --scope user a

Hi All,I want to release invoice on screen Process Invoice and Memo via REST API. I add screen and actions to the endpoint.The problem is if I send POST request to {{baseUrl}}/ProcessSalesInvoices/ProcessAll. The endpoint asks Entity in the body. That means I only can process one invoice per request. If I send PUT request to {{baseUrl}}/ProcessSalesInvoices with body:{    "DocDetails": [        {            "RefNbr": {                "value": "INV100031"            },            "Selected": {                "value": true            }        },        {            "RefNbr": {                "value": "INV100033"            },            "Selected": {                "value": true            }        }    ],    "ScreenAction": {        "value": "Release"    },    "Action":{        "value":"Process"    }}.   Nothing happened.  The reason I don’t use {{baseUrl}}/SalesInvoice/ReleaseSalesInvoice is I need to wait the invoice to release one by one.   

Hello guys, our receiver accidentally receive 1 item 2 times and I try to return it in the system. However, it show me The Original Inventory Receipt must be release prior to return.Can some support me with this issue.Thanks  

In SALES ORERS/ TRANSACTIONS SHIPMENTS. Whether the shipment is unpicked, picked, or picked an packed there is a function when you used to be able to  “correct the shipment”. This feature now just returns an error, and locks the order up. If you don’t wish to finish the shipment and send to invoicing, you can’t change how the product was packed into boxes, you can’t put it on hold and delete the picklist (which allowed me, formerlly, to then delete the shipment) So reverse the order through all it’s steps, after the picking was confirmed, to delete the picklist, then the shipment. I now have a bunch of orders tied up like this due to user error (error confirming before finishing picking and the like, you know human stuff, and now cannot correct the errors.  It is super frustrating. So far I waited a week for acumatica to respond to my software vendor SWK’s issue, as the error that Acumatica was generating says “ERRORS HAVE OCCURRED” and correcting the shipment fails, the picklist doesn

Hello all,I have a basic requirement that an AP Bill should only be created if the PO receipt is 100%, else it should allow the user to even create it. How to achieve this?

Hi all, I am looking for a way to merge all the attachments for the transactions (for e.g., and AP Bill) showing up on AP Edit Detailed report into a PDF and link it on the same report against respective transactions. Please let me know if you have any suggestions/ alternatives for this. Appreciate your time!

I have added a custom screen to the mobile app.This is NOT coming from a GI.  I have found using a GI for this is a complete nightmare.  Is it possible to add a filter to a screen that is not coming from a GI? I’d like to be able to add a label to the Reminder Date field.  I cannot find a way to do this. When you click Add or tap an existing record, the custom screen opens and works perfectly. This is the screen on the site: This is the code for the Mobile App.  add screen IC301010 { Add container "ICSCallLogView" { fieldsToShow = 10 containerActionsToExpand = 4 add layout "CustomerRow" { displayName = "Customer" layout = "Inline" add field "CustomerNbr" } add field "CallDate" add layout "ReminderDateTimeRow" { displayName = "Reminder" layout = "Inline" add field "ReminderDateDate" add field "ReminderDateTime" } add field "Location" add field "Status" add field "Category" add field "Summary" add field "Details" add

Does the customer portal support row level security?

We are currently on 24R1, upgrading to 26R1 soon.  Is there a way to create a clock entry for multiple employees at once?

Hi, allI create PXCacheExtension<PMProformaLine> and add new custom field.Next i override method BillTask. In this method base functional create PMProformaTransactLine line = new PMProformaTransactLine();And when i try this  AKTPMProformaLineExt lineExt = line.GetExtension<AKTPMProformaLineExt>();I get this error. GetItemExtension failed. 

Hi,In the 2024-R1 I don't see the Total Cost field on the Purchase Receipt - Summary area. Is this a change with 2024-R1?Please refer below screenshots. 2023- R1 2024-R1 Thank you,Dulanjana

Hello all, I wanted to share a tip that threw me of course today. If you use an attribute field in a formula in a Generic Inquiry which is aggregated at all, this will throw an error similar to this: To overcome this, you should add an Inner Join to the table which holds the attribute with the following data field links (in this case I will use Inventory Item as the example): The NoteID link ensures that the right record is selected, and the AttributeID link ensures that the right attribute value is selected. In your results grid, instead of this: You should use this:  Once you had switched out those values you will be able to load your GI:   Happy GI Building!