Introducing Acumatica Cloud ERP: 2026R2
Get inspired and gain all the knowledge you need
Recently active
I would like to modify the styles for the popup window on the AR302000 page.however, after multiple attempts, it doesn't seem to be taking effect. Is something wrong? -AR302000--extensions---AR302000_CustomCss.html---AR302000_CustomCss.css--AR302000.html--AR302000.ts AR302000_CustomCss.html:<template> <require from="./AR302000_CustomCss.css" /></template> AR302000_CustomCss.css:#paymentDialog .qp-resizable { height: 85vh;}.aabbcc { height: 72vh;}.top-bar-cont{ background-color: red;}
Hello Acumatica Community,I'm excited to invite a limited number of Acumatica customers to participate in an exclusive Acumatica Customer Program designed to demonstrate how predictive AI decision intelligence can help executive leadership and project teams improve project outcomes.This exclusive program is being offered by TrueProject for Acumatica customers and is proudly sponsored by Acumatica Chief Product Officer Jon Pollock.As a participant, your organization will receive a complimentary 30-day evaluation of TrueProject with no cost, no commitment, and minimal to no IT involvement.During the evaluation, you'll experience how predictive AI can help your organization:Gain an objective, AI-driven assessment of the health and success likelihood of your active projects. Identify project risks weeks earlier than traditional reporting methods, providing more time to take corrective action. Receive practical AI recommendations to improve project outcomes before issues become critical. Pr
Hi,I’m trying to hide zero values in report through condition but there is a value difference when I run the report.Could you please me to hide values through visbile expression. I tried some condition but it is showing true or false.Please below image and RPX file
Hi Team,I have one processing screen, using which I am creating customer, then order using the created customer and then payment for the created order in the same process.There is an inconsistent error “The item CustomerID is not found (restricted:False,external:True,value:xyz)” is coming at the time of payment creation. The strange thing here is the Customer is there in the system and Order is also created using the same customer but at the time of payment creation getting this error and that too not the case with all the records. As, for some of the records the flow is working fine from customer creation to order to payment.Can anyone suggest something about the possible cause and resolution of this please. Thanks in advance!
We are attempting to upgrade from 24R2 to the 26R1 release of Acumatica, and one of the changes in this release or the previous one is that the Kit Assembly Component Splits looks to prevent the line from defaulting the location for parts with serial numbers that are user-entered on receipt. public class INComponentLineSplittingExtension : LineSplittingExtension<KitAssemblyEntry, INKitRegister, INComponentTran, INComponentTranSplit>{ protected override void SetUnassignedQty(INComponentTran line, decimal detailsBaseQty, bool allowNegative) { base.SetUnassignedQty(line, detailsBaseQty, allowNegative); UpdateUnassignedLine(line); } protected virtual void UpdateUnassignedLine(INComponentTran line) { if ((line.UnassignedQty ?? 0) == 0 || line.TranType != INTranType.Assembly) return; if (line.LocationID != null line.LocationID = null; if (line.LotSerialNbr != null) line.LotSerialNbr = null; if (li
I’m trying to find a specific data class mentioned in this guide: link, however, I can’t find ARPaymentEntry.LoadOptions. Is this a outdated Item class, or does it go by a different name?
I had a customization project error in our sandbox.Ever since the error occurred, I can’t publish or unpublish anything without getting another error prompt during compilation.[2026-07-09 11:16:04.284] Removing previous Modern UI files[2026-07-09 11:16:14.321] Error while deleting screen info folderHow would I go about fixing this?Acumatica 2025 R2, Build 25.201.0213
<template> <qp-template id="Document_PXLayoutRule1_div0" name="1-1-1" > <qp-fieldset id="Document_CstPXLayoutRule21_fs" wg-container="Document_form" view.bind="Document" slot="A"> <field name="WPickingNbr"></field> <field name="SiteID"></field> <field name="CreateTransfer"></field> <field name="Description"></field> </qp-fieldset> <qp-fieldset id="Document_CstPXLayoutRule22_fs" wg-container="Document_form" view.bind="Document" slot="B"> <field name="ShipDate_Date"></field> <field name="Time"></field> <field name="TransferNbr"> <qp-field control-state.bind="Document.TransferReleased"></qp-field> </field> </qp-fieldset> </qp-template> <qp-tabbar id="Tab"> <qp-tab id="TabDetails" caption="Details">
I have a dozen fields on a form that have cascading PXFormulas to calculate other field values automatically. For example:Base PriceCommission RateCommission Value (PXFormula of [Base Price] times [Commission Rate]House Comm. Split RateHouse Commission (PXFormula of [Base Price] times [House Comm. Split Rate])Everything calculates correctly when the record is saved but Classic UI updates these fields right away.The post below also talks about this but the solution there was to change all of the PXFormulas to PXDBScalars but I’m not sure that this is appropriate as I’m storing all of these values.Is there something I need to write in the .ts file to trigger the PXFormulas or do I need to make each field use PXFieldState<PXFieldOptions.CommitChanges> and write out all of the formulas in Updated events?
When worked with acumatica old version, clicked button “Update Customization Project” never show the message above. I just raise the question here to clarify the features. Do you guy know it ?
I didn’t see a place to post the little gotchas that can turn into time eating development cycles so I thought I’d start it.Today I had an issue with a screen that needed severe orthodontic work.It was supposed to look like this:As it turns out, the issue was an “empty” qp-fieldset that I was having an issue with. When I removed the comment tags, the screen rendered properly instead of every following field from being placed into that “empty” fieldset. <qp-template id="formTPCommissionsSetup" name="17-17-14"> <div id="colSetTPCommSetupA" slot="A"> <qp-fieldset id="fldSetTPCommSetupA" view.bind="CurrentDocument"> <!-- <field name="CurrentDocument.SalesPersonID_description"></field> --> </qp-fieldset> </div> <div id="colSetTPCommSetupB" slot="B"> <qp-fieldset id="fldSetTPCommSetupB" view.bind="CurrentDocument"> <field name="CurrentDocument.UsrTPCommRateClass"></field> </qp-fieldset> &l
We have a client who is live on BigCommerce and wants to import their existing stock item catalog into Acumatica first to get Stock items set up and the External ID links established, then switch the sync direction to Export with Acumatica as the master going forward. Has anyone done this before? What's the recommended way to manage this? can we map item class using a custom field from BC to Acumatica to match it to the correct item class using import mapping? And once you flip to Export, does the connector pick up the existing External ID links and update the BC products cleanly without creating duplicates?
Does anyone know if this functionality has been improved?This is an operational situation we see, both planned an unplanned, where we want to be able to link demand from an existing Service Order to an existing Purchase Order.This is in order to account for changes/mistakes after the original purchase order was created from the demand and also we need to be able to take advantage of purchase requirements for vendors such as minimum order qty, total order amount, free shipping, etc.Our purchasing is not centralized and many people do their own purchasing as needed.There should be a way to link to demand from transactions that haven’t been purchased yet to existing purchase orders.One way would be to identify an Existing Purchase Order on the Create Purchase Orders screen before the processing happens.Another option is to have the ability to set the PO Detail Line Line Type to Goods for SO or Goods for FS and be able to lookup and set the Sales Order or Service Order detail line.Another
So far, here are the ones supported. There could be more. Would request the community to update this list.Authorize.net (native) APS PayPal PayFlow Braintree WorldPay eBiz AcuCharge (Vantage Card) PayPal Request for Money (not a payment gateway, but a way to send email to customer and get money via their PayPal account) === Administrator Note, added July 22, 2026 ===Acumatica Payments is the focus of Acumatica internal development. This was launched in 2023 R2 and works in the USA and Canada. There is also an option for UK customers to utilize Stripe.
We have a requirement to restrict the release of SOs and Invoices linked to a Project: Current behavior: The system allows releasing SOs/Invoices even if the customer is different from the Project's customer. Our requirement: We want to block the release if the customer on the SO/Invoice does not match the Project's customer. The system should only allow releasing when the document customer is the same as the Project customer. Is there a way or setup to apply this rule to our system?
I’m trying to customize a grid with dynamic columns, the number of columns are based on how many items it has on Attributes screen (CS205000). Here are the samples, Sample 1 Sample 2 I have the code in EntryMatrix_RowSelected event which will try to hide a column(s) based on certain condition I tried using this code, but it didn’t work,PXUIFieldAttribute.SetVisibility(sender, "Extra Small", PXUIVisibility.Invisible);PXUIFieldAttribute.SetVisible(sender, "Extra Small", false); I can’t also use this since it has no direct DAC attribute,PXUIFieldAttribute.SetVisibility<DAC.attribute>(sender, null, PXUIVisibility.Invisible);PXUIFieldAttribute.SetVisible<DAC.attribute>(sender, null, false); Is there other way to hide column(s) maybe by name or index?
I have a lot of customers who choose a different payroll provider because Acumatica does not have an HR module, is there any plan to add one in the near future.
Hello:We’re looking at the feasibility of converting to modern UI in production when it leaves the Beta.I’ve ran into several interesting things, but one that feels concerning in the long run. It is common in our custom code to have DAC’s with properties decorated as the following example: [PXFormula(typeof(Selector<MyCustomClass.vendorID, Vendor.acctName>))]In classic UI, these formulas are calculated correctly as soon as the DAC is exantlated (as expected?).However, in modern UI, the above PXFormula is never calculated (verified with a break point put on an explicit setter). This was a bit of a surprise as we were tending to approach the UI as being two different display layers - ‘views’ - built on top of the underlying model and controller. Is this a bug? If not a bug is the construction we are using deprecated or invalid and only working unintentionally? is there a property in the PXFormula that would make this work? If not can you suggest an alternative approach?We se
Hello everyone,I’m having the following problem: I’m trying to convert a Classic UI screen into Modern UI and 3 of the buttons are not getting hidden for some reason but there’s a try that my colleague tried doing a while ago and the buttons are working as expected there but I’m unable to recreate them for some reason using the automatically converted screen into Modern UI. The buttons I’m having that issue are “Confirm, Generate and Change Order” also another thing I noticed is that we cant reuse the Transactions variable because if we do, the Subcontracts grid is not being automatically loaded on page refresh or load.The version of Acumatica I’m working with is 2025 R2. Here’s the automatically generated source code: I’ll have to paste the source code into pastebin since the source code is a bit too long and the post cannot be createdthe HTML filethe TS file that contains the viewinfoand the actual views TS file now the files from my colleague:The HTML filethe TS file Now the C# cod
We are having an issue attempting to partially ship an SO line linked to a partially completed production order. Work order/SO quantity is 100, we have 50 complete. Selecting the SO line shows 50 on hand/ available / available for shipping, but none allocated. Line details shows the below, which looks strange from what I recall in the past. This hasn’t been an issue in the past but we recently upgraded to 25.201.0213.2 and this isn’t something we do often so wondering if it is a bug or some obscure setting that now needs to be changed. Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks,Dan
I got a couple issues with the Shopify Connector, specifically the customer location sync.At random it will create more than one location for the customer in Acumatica. It will activate one and deactivate the other. Since upgrading to 2025R2 we have every day one or two orders where it will fail to import due to "property set method not found". What we found is that it means that the location is not active. When you go to it in Acumatica, you cannot activate it either. You need to create an additional location, make that the default, then you can go back to the other location and activate it. In addition I found today that when I look at audit history for any customer, it will show me a bunch of location changes for different customers, different random locations. I don't know what these mean and why they're showing up on another customer that's not even connected to our Shopify store.
Hi, In GST Pending Recognition report below, there is an Unrecognized Tax Total. This is a standard report in Acumatica.How do I get the 2 headers (Taxable Amt and Tax Amt) total just like how Unrecognized Tax Total is? Based on the screenshot below, it totals per Tax ID (i.e., G1SALESINCGST).I’ve tried using formulas such as =Sum(Max([SVATConversionHistExt.TaxAmt])) but that doesn’t work. It gives me wrong totals. I’ve tried variables too - doesn’t work either.
Hello,We are getting an error when trying to approve clock entries, :The clock entry cannot be approved because a labor transaction with the NNN number has already been created for this clock entry.These clock entries are time applied to production orders.I thought that clock entries didn’t go into a batch until they were approved. Is that correct?How can I get past this error?
Hi, I am trying to import AP bills. The AP Bills are tied to a PO Receipt. As well as the vendor, I have the PO number & PO Receipt Line number. I am having an issue with trying to select the Add PO Receipt Line in the Scenario. The Document is being created but nothing else is happening.(If in migration mode, you cannot use the Add PO Receipt button) Does anyone have any solutions/ideas for getting this to work?Thank you in advance!Bill
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.