Introducing Acumatica Cloud ERP: 2026R2
Get inspired and gain all the knowledge you need
Recently active
Hi everyone,Has anyone here actually used Global PayEx integrated with Acumatica for both AP automation and AI cash application?Global PayEX ERP IntegrationI see they officially support Acumatica integration on their website, but I'd love to get real user feedback on how it actually works in practice. Any overall impressions or things to watch out for?Thanks!
Hello, I currently have a GI set up to display an amount with a decimal that is two digits in so we can display it as 1111.00. Does anyone have any tricks for getting the value to add commas in after the hundredths place? Below is my current config.=iif([ComplianceDocument.LienWaiverAmount]=null,'-',left(cstr([ComplianceDocument.LienWaiverAmount]),instr(cstr([ComplianceDocument.LienWaiverAmount]),'.')+2)) Thank you,Justin Long
We find ourselves in a position where the subaccount structure that we have is very unhandy to modify or extend. Yes it can be done but it’s cumbersome and will make reporting look very messy as subaccounts will overflow all standard text fields.Acumatica has virtually 0 flexibility to change anything with an existing subaccount structure. How do companies that are growing, adding new regions, new business divisions etc do this? A 20MM business does not have the same reporting needs as a 50MM/100MM/300MM business.You can’t plan the future perfectly and it feels like there’s no flexibility in Acumatica’s subaccount structure for this change and growth. Does any one have suggestions for how to handle this?Specifically: There are two entire segments of our subaccount structure that I would like to eliminate, and insert another segment between two existing ones.Coming from QB, we fundamentally misunderstood the term “subaccounts” to mean something similar to what QB means. I wish Acumatica
Hi, I need to build query which will extract ‘Landed Cost Nbr‘ field value from “Landed Costs” in Purchase Receipt entity,I guess the query must look something like that : https://acum2025r1.arts.com/AcumaticaERP/entity/Default/24.200.001/PurchaseReceipt?$filter=ReceiptNbr eq '020305' and Type eq 'Receipt'&$expand=LandedCosts but I am not sure how to properly add “Landed Cost” field to endpointI tried to add LandedCosts group for purchase receipt same as I added ‘details’ group, It created separate entityHot to extract landed cost nbr properly ?
Hi Everyone,How to customize the Report Definitions screen to add the fields under the Default Data Source Settings for the PM Type.
Hi All,I want to change the Freight Price and Amount on SO303000. I tried few different way but can’t make it. My most current request.I send PUT request to endpoint SalesInvoicewith body:{ "ReferenceNbr": { "value": "INVSP212099" }, "Type": { "value": "Invoice" }, "FreightDetails": [ { "OrderNbr":{ "value":"SP219039" }, "OrderType":{ "value":"SP" }, "ShipmentNbr": { "value": "SHP297504" }, "ShipmentType": { "value": "Shipment" }, "FreightAmount": { "value": 0 } } ]}This will add a new line not update the current data. Do anyone have been done this before? Thank you.
While trying to import “users’ with the user type of “Portal External User” I encounter an error: “Unable to link employee with guest user. Do you want to proceed operation and remove link?” I have tried adding the dialog box with the answer of yes and it still doesn’t work.Import Scenario
I’m experiencing an issue in Modern UI where a link in a grid column is not opening target screen when clicking on the field.Here is the TS:@columnConfig({ editorConfig: { linkCommand: "ViewBills" }, width: 70,})BillID: PXFieldState<PXFieldOptions.CommitChanges>;When I click on the BillID field, nothing happens. I also tried adding allowEdit: true, but it did not resolve the issue. What’s confusing is that in another screen I have a very similar configuration, and it works correctly the link opens as expected:@columnConfig({ editorConfig: { linkCommand: "ViewInvoice" }, width: 90})InvoiceId: PXFieldState;
Hi all,we are currently using the Acumatica mobile application on scanners, but it is limited to certain screens.Is it possible to add additional screens, such as Move and Materials from Production Orders in the Manufacturing module, to the mobile application for scanner use?I wanted to check whether this can be done through configuration, mobile app setup, or features settings, or if it would require a customization.
Hello. When we create a new item in acumatica, we fill in the Default Warehouse, Default Issue From, and Default Receipt To fields within the Stock Items screen.However, on the first use of the item the system creates an entry in the Item Warehouse Details and populates it from the warehouse settings instead of the item settings, which is just a broad catchall location instead of the specific location on the item. This would be fine if the material was coming/going from the non-default warehouse, but it shouldn’t be the case when using the default warehouse.Once this entry has been made, the system seems to entirely ignore the defaults in the Stock Items screen. How can i get the system to initially populate using the Stock Item settings instead of the Warehouse settings?Stock Item:Initial population after putting initial items into location 913-A-1 in an adjustment (adjustment did not default to 913-A-1 either):
I just wanted to take a moment to share with everyone about Acumatica’s first distribution/commerce focused customer user group. As the description states, this is a group focused on the distribution space and it’s unique needs and challenges.The plan is to hold virtual meetings and in-person meetups at Acumatica Summits in the future. Thank you to @jharris and @james.mallory for kicking this off!Stay tuned for great things!Request to Join here! Distribution Customer User Group
Hi all,I wanted to check the feasibility of a customization in Acumatica for Production Orders.Currently, once the Production Order moves to In-Process status, the BOM ID and Revision are locked by design, based on the Acumatica Community response, it appears a customization may be possible to alter the behavior.Our requirement is to evaluate whether the system can allow updating the BOM ID and Revision on a Production Order even after it reaches In-Process status, ideally until the final Move transaction i.e. Production order Status completed.Please review whether this is technically feasible and advise on the possible approach, impact and limitations.Attached is the Community thread for reference.How to handle BOM revision changes after a Production Order is in In-Process status? | Community
nevermind…
I know there are a lot of endpoints, but is there a way to get a single swagger file for Acumatica’s REST API, or must I get one per endpoint?
I am trying to create a Return for Credit for one of my customers. Usually I am able to attach/link an invoice to the RC and add the item so it returns back to my inventory. However, this particular customer/invoice does not populate the product that needs to be returned back to inventory. Does anyone have a suggestion or is there something I may be missing. I don’t want to just add the item without linking the invoice and then I end up messing up inventory or have issues refunding my customer when I do the Credit Memo.
Hi everyone,We were having issue with the MRP,We have two separate projects, and each project has one Production order. Both production orders use the same BOM and the same material item. Both Projects are configured with inventory tracking = Track by Project quantity and cost.Scenario details: Projects ID Production Order Nbr Start Date BOM ID Purchase Order PROJ-VK-45 ORDER41326 5/11/26 BOM1 008815 JB-007 ORDER2 4/27/26 BOM1 Test steps:Created both production orders under two different projects. Since ORDER2 had the earlier start date, I placed ORDER2 on hold for testing purposes. Ran Regenerate Inventory Planning. Based on the demand from ORDER41326, the system created the supply suggestion, and we created a Purchase Order 008815 Then I removed ORDER2 from hold Ran MRP again Reviewed Inventory Planning Results by Item.Issue observed: After the second MRP run, the s
Hi all,I have a question regarding the BOM Compare screen in Multi- Level BOM.when I compare two revisions of the same Bill of Materials, the compare does not explode down to the lower material level to show the detailed component changes. Because of this, I’m not able to clearly identify the exact changes at the lower level unless I manually go and perform the BOM compare on the Lower-Level BOM itself.Is this the intended behavior of the screen, or is there any setting, configuration, or process that needs to be enabled so that it can explode fully and show the lower-level material changes directly?
We are currently Drop-Ship Purchase Orders in Acumatica for Items that are shipped directly from the Vendor/Manufacturer to the job site/customer site. Is there any way to track these drop-ship Purchase Orders in Acumatica once the vendor ship them? we are looking to understand whether there is any standard integration or a third-party plug-in available to track shipment and delivery status for drop-ship orders.Any input or best practices would be appreciated.
Hi Team,I need guidance on customizing Global Search behavior for Invoice Reference Numbers.Current Behavior:If Invoice status = Balanced, search opens Invoices (SO303000) If Invoice status = Open or Closed, search opens Invoices and Memos (AR301000)For invoices with status Open or Closed, I want Global Search to return two results:One navigating to Invoices (SO303000) Another navigating to Invoices and Memos (AR301000)Is it possible to configure or customize Global Search to show multiple navigation results for the same reference number?If yes, how can this be achieved (Customization Project, DAC extension, or any specific configuration)?Any guidance or examples would be helpful.Thank you!
As of now, here is a test:My goal is to import three GL transaction records in a single batch. I have been working on this scenario for over two days and several iterations. As of now, the scenario imports the records and creates 2 batches from 3 records. I am attaching the latest version of the import scenario and the sample data. As of now, the source for this data is a SQL Server table, but for simplification, I have exported it to an Excel file (attached). The amount fields in the table are defined a money columns.You may notice a lot of hard-coding because I had to hardcode several field values to understand what is going on.I am working on Acumatica 2025 R1Build 25.101.0153.7
When processing a Purchase Receipt, the system automatically generates a Journal Transaction hitting Account A and Account B based on the default setup.Is there a way to change the Subaccount for Account A for one specific Purchase Receipt only? I am aware that I can use the Reclassify feature if the document is already Released, but I want to know how to modify the Subaccount at the point of entry before the transaction is finalized.
Hello Acumatica Team,We have a requirement to add a custom field in the Application History tab of the Payments and Applications screen. This field should be populated from the Blanket Sales Order CustomerOrderNbr and must be updated during Payment Release and Payment Capture.I attempted to override the Release action. When updating the value before the baseMethod call, the Application History (ARTranPostBal) View Details is not loading. When updating after the baseMethod call, the view loads correctly, but the value is not persisting. However, updating the value using PXDatabase.Update works as expected.I also tried using row events, but observed the same behavior with no success.Could you please clarify:Where the default logic for updating Application History during Release and Capture is implemented? What is the correct extension point to reliably update this custom field?Version: 25R1Thanks in Advance!
Hi everyone,If you develop for Acumatica, you already know the biggest bottleneck in our daily workflow: making a small code change, building the DLL, and then waiting several minutes for IIS to load the instance just to see if your change worked.To solve this, I’ve developed a new Visual Studio extension called Acumatica Live Sync. It bypasses the constant rebuild/restart cycle, allowing you to see your code changes in the instance almost instantly. - Key BenefitsZero-Wait Updates: Once initialized, any saved changes to your code (renaming fields, modifying logic) are immediately reflected in Acumatica without an IIS restart.Full Structural Editing: It’s not just for small tweaks. You can add new actions, create brand new extension files, or delete existing ones on the fly.Native Debugging Support: You don't lose any Visual Studio features. You can still set breakpoints directly in your project, they will hit as expected, and you can inspect or modify values at runtime.Zero Risk to So
Can we create a GI directly from a report. I want to make changes in the report and it is very hard with the report designer to do that.
Has AvidXchange launched end to end Purchase to Pay Integration with Acumatica?
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.