Discussion Forums

I can get a richtext editor onto a Modern UI screen, or at least a box that displays html, I can’t seem to find any way to control the height of the text area.  I need to to be at least 500px high.I attempted to add the class stretch, but it didn’t work.HTML / TS<template>  <qp-fieldset id="Document_PXLayoutRule1_fs" view.bind="Document" wg-container="Document_form">    <field name="Question"></field>  </qp-fieldset>  <qp-fieldset id="Document_PXLayoutRule2_fs" view.bind="Document" wg-container="Document_form" class="stretch">    <field name="Answer" control-type="qp-rich-text-editor" class="stretch"></field>  </qp-fieldset></template>export class AskQuestionFilter extends PXView { Question: PXFieldState; Answer: PXFieldState;}The class stretch on the fieldset makes the grey container area large but doesn’t affect the RichText control. If I add it to both the fieldset and the field then the RichText control stays small (in h

We are currently on 2025R1 and noticed this week that we are unable to add a new record from the Subcontracts primary list. When it was reported by a user, I checked user rights and this individual has full access to that screen.  I as an admin also am no longer able to see the ‘+’ sign to add a new record form the SC3010PL screen.   As a workaround we are able to add a new record by opening an existing record and clicking the ‘+’ from there, or from the Commitments screen of a project. Our production instance is: Build 25.101.0153.9 + Our Sandbox, which is build Build 25.101.0153.2 +, has the ‘+’ on the pl list.  I even made a copy of the Subcontracts PL in our Sandbox, exported it and imported to our Live instance, and the ‘+” is no longer visible.  Wondering if anyone out in the community has seen this behaviour and/or what else I should do to troubleshoot it?   There was a patch applied to our Prod instance last week so am wondering if this might have anything to do with that. 

Good morning,We are finding that when clicking on the  calendar / Year in our various Report Designer reports, the list of year values is now limited.  The first year in the list is after our go-live, so to see a wide open date range, we need to key in the value, instead of using the calendar view like below to switch to a year in the teens..Did something change recently that would limit the years in some way?  Can this be configured in our setup to extend the range?Thanks!  

We are looking to try and use the “selector” type attribute. However, we want to have the ability to open the record that was selected. Currently, I am only seeing the magnifying glass which brings up the table to select the data record we want. Is there a way to add the “pencil” or a hyperlink in order open the data record once it has been selected? Thanks! Selector attribute only allowing record selection, not access to the selected record. 

When i try to convert the My Documents screen to Modern UI i cant find its base TypeScript and HTML code like in the picture  i cant create an extension because the base does not exist​​​​​​

Hi, I would like to clarify a limitation I encountered when working with the Paycheck entity (Screen ID: PR302000 - Paychecks and Adjustments) via Web Services. While reviewing the entity, I noticed the following warning on certain fields:"Do not include fields of this object in a request that retrieves a list of entities. To retrieve those fields, request entities one by one by specifying key fields."From my understanding, this means that some fields (such as detail-level fields like Taxes or similar sub-objects) cannot be retrieved using a standard list request and instead require querying each record individually using its key fields. I would like to ask:Is there any supported way to retrieve these fields in a single list request (e.g., via $expand, endpoint configuration, or other approaches)? Are there any recommended alternatives to avoid multiple per-record API calls, especially for large datasets? Would using a Generic Inquiry (GI) or custom endpoint be the only viable workarou

We build-to-order a configurable subassembly (that is linked to its parent) that we would like to pre-assign a serial # to.  When the shop floor employee does the final Move on the configurable subassembly, they will assign a serial # (system should auto-populate the pre-assigned serial # if qty = 1, but that’s a different subject).At this point, the system should know which serialized configurable subassembly goes with the parent production order (via the references tab of the production order), and I wish I could backflush the configurable subassembly into the parent production order (by the way, the reason I have to make the serial class issue method “User Enterable” is because one configurable subassembly in inventory might cost $1,000 more than another configurable subassembly with the same Inventory ID).  But when I attempt to backflush, it says I cannot because the issue method is “User Enterable”.If I type in the serial # that was assigned for the Move (when completing the conf

Hello all,I’ve been trying to create an import scenario that will not only create a new SO with the line items but also update the existing ones if there’s a new item added in the list to the already existing SO. The data source is a GI. What is it that I am missing?Note: the line items may have the same item IDs to be imported as a new or updating the already existing one. I have been trying to map it on the basis of the Line numbers. 

I'm building an integration that creates Sales Orders and Drop-Ship Purchase Orders via the Acumatica REST API (endpoint version 24.200.001 / a custom endpoint based on it). Once the SO and PO are created, the integration then links the PO and SO line via the API. Everything works correctly when the PO vendor matches the item's default vendor in Acumatica, but fails when using a non-default vendor.What works: After creating the SO and Drop-Ship PO, I release the SO from Hold, then send: PUT /SalesOrder?$expand=Details,Details/PurchasingDetails{ "OrderType": { "value": "SO" }, "OrderNbr": { "value": "SO-000123" }, "Details": [{ "id": "<soLineId>", "PurchasingDetails": [{ "POOrderType": { "value": "Drop-Ship" }, "POOrderNbr": { "value": "PO-000456" }, "POOrderLineNbr": { "value": 1 }, "Selected": { "value": true } }] }]}When the PO vendor is the item's default vendor, SOLineSplit records are auto-created by Acumatica when the PO is sav

I’m looking for guidance on a scenario I’m running into with non-stock Sales Orders, and would appreciate any insights or best practice advice.We are using Sales Orders to manage non-stock items (services / consulting type work). Our requirement is fairly straightforward from a business perspective:We create a Sales Order and progressively add lines over time We generate invoices from the SO as work is billed Occasionally, after an invoice has been released, we need to: issue a partial credit, or fully credit the invoice and then re-invoice The challenge is trying to manage both invoices and credit memos against the same Sales Order, while keeping the SO open so we can continue adding lines and invoicing in the future.What I am seeing so far:Using standard SO order types, I can invoice as expected, but there doesn’t seem to be a clean way to issue credit memos from the SO Using IN or MO order types allows more flexibility around mixed transactions, however these appear to complete or

Hi Team,I am working on an custom report based on PMTimeActivity and needed to add a Manager filter using EPCompanyTreeMaster and EPCompanyTreeMember so managers can view only their employees.I added joins similar to:BAccount.DefContactID = EPCompanyTreeMember.ContactIDEPCompanyTreeMember.WorkGroupID = EPCompanyTree.WorkGroupIDand filtered using:EPCompanyTreeMaster.Description Like @ManagerOR@Manager IsNullThe filter works correctly, but after adding the EPCompanyTreeMaster and EPCompanyTreeMember joins, the report values are getting duplicated.Kindly assist if you have added similar filtering using EPCompanyTreeMaster and EPCompanyTreeMember in reports.Please find the screenshots of my joinings and filterings    

Hello,    We are trying to generate from PO to PO receipt . However, the system pop up error  But strange, the same Item and same vendor, we did generate successfully on another PO 5 days ago.                     How can we fix it, please help.we are using Build 21.208.0032

We are launching a Shopify store and are running into an issue when trying to sync template items to Shopify variants. The way we currently have it set up it is creating variants in Shopify of the attributes that we created for the templates in Acumatica. Screenshot attached shows the two attributes “Shopify Range” and “Size”. But we only want the size to be displayed to customers. Is there a way for the matrix items to be synced but not have these attributes being created as variants in Shopify?Most of our products have multiple sizes, but never have a second variant type that you would need to choose from (eg: color, etc.).

I would like to tag each appointment or service order line with a code 001 through 011. This will determine which lines to group on the invoice with a total for those lines and a custom description. Eg. Material, Labor, Misc. These would be the only lines appearing on the invoice with a grand total.

We just had a customer upgrade to 2025 R2 and everything seems to take a little longer and timeout errors are fairly common. We noticed this in 2025 R1, but the issues seem to persist in 2025 R2.For example I just imported about 2,000 invoices and the GI for the invoices and memos list in the modern UI is offering a timeout error. The issue resolves itself when switching the screen back to classic.Is this a common experience on other sites?  

Was anyone else part of the emergency maintenance done this past weekend?  We were apparently moved to a new server node or something, as both our Installation ID and external IP were changed.I’m not sure the reasons for the migration, but since users started to sign in today, our performance has been abysmal, at times completely unusable.  Our VAR has an Urgent ticket open with Acumatica support but I’m curious if anyone else that was part of this maintenance is seeing any issues.

I have a prospect that needs the ability for their sales people to map out sales calls when they go to an area.  For example, I am flying to Ohio for a week, and I have 25 customers that I need to see.  What is the best route to minimize drive time from each customer and what is the best order of go?  They do not need Field Service only CRM… 

I’m trying to configure DeviceHub to connect to my local development instance and I’m getting this error: Failed to connect to http://localhost/siteName/signalr/hubs/deviceHub serverI can’t find any related posts or information.

I am trying to release payroll and am receiving the below error. Any idea what could be causing this? When looking at the trace I thought it has something to do with PTO, but I removed PTO from the employees time and tried to release, and I am still receiving the error.  at System.ThrowHelper.ThrowInvalidOperationException(ExceptionResource resource) at PX.Objects.PR.PTOHelper.GetBankStartDate(PXGraph graph, Int32 bAccountID, PREmployeePTOBank employeePTOBank) at PX.Objects.PR.PRPayChecksAndAdjustments.CreatePTOBanks(PRPayment row) at PX.Objects.PR.PRPayChecksAndAdjustments.UpdateChildrenRecords(PRPayment row) at PX.Objects.PR.PRPayChecksAndAdjustments.InsertNewPayment(PRPayment payment) at PX.Objects.PR.PRPayBatchEntry.CreatePayments(PRBatch currentBatch) at PX.Objects.PR.PRPayBatchEntry.<>c__DisplayClass91_0.<release>b__0() at PX.Async.CancellationIgnorantExtensions.RunWithCancellationViaThreadAbort(Action method, CancellationToken cancellationToken) at PX.Async.Cancel

In Acumatica 24R1 through 25R2, I have experienced an issue of the Shipstation “Age” being off by up to 23hrs. This seems to be the “expected” behavior according to Shipstation. Has anyone else experienced this issue? If so, any work arounds? 

I am trying to create a production order from the production order screen and am getting the following error message:AM Error: The following error occurred when the system tried to copy the BOM: Unable to cast object of type 'PX.Data.PXSegmentedState' to type 'System.String'.I have checked the BOM and cannot find anything wrong with it. Has anyone ever seen this message or know what it’s looking for?   

I get this error when trying to patch either of my 26 R1 instances:[17:24:59 ERR] Could not find file 'Y:\Sites\Demo26R1\Bin\ac.exe'.The weird thing is that I successfully patched a 25 R2 instance which also does not have ‘ac.exe’ in ‘bin’ but it’s not a problem there. And I successfully patched one of the 26 R1 instances about a week ago.Here’s the whole output: Site: Demo26R1[17:24:58 INF] PatchTool version: 1.8.2.0.[17:24:58 INF] Verifying the Acumatica ERP version.[17:24:58 INF] Found version: 26.100.0175[17:24:58 INF] Requesting patch information from server: https://update.acumatica.com/rest[17:24:59 INF] Requesting patch information from the following server: https://update.acumatica.com/rest[17:24:59 INF] Collecting the checksum for patched files.[17:24:59 INF] File: PX.BulkInsert.dll, Checksum: E9DFCCA196B5DABE15B3C49F06FD30BAF6D421C24B9A0B565D81A056B920BF263A8F6CEF3BDB6AC2FBFA778AC0EC5A01DB2F83CF00DB6D1AE8F98809B373B6BF[17:24:59 INF] File: PX.CCProcessing.Fortis.dll, Checksum

Expand below for Table of Contents.Overview Getting Started  Capabilities and Limitations  Technical Architecture and Security  Troubleshooting and Best Practices    Acumatica 2025 R2 introduces AI Automation with AI Studio as an Experimental Feature, a secure and configurable framework that allows users to automate field-level updates within documents using AI-driven logic. The system interacts with large language model (LLM) providers such as Anthropic, AWS, Azure, and OpenAI. This feature empowers users to simplify repetitive in-document tasks securely and transparently.Read our release notes here. OverviewWhat is AI Automation with AI Studio? AI Automation with AI Studio in 2025 R2 enables users to automate field-level actions within a single Acumatica document using AI-powered logic. It helps streamline repetitive field updates or deletions directly within supported screens. Automation is always user-initiated through an action button.    What version of Acumatica supports AI Auto

Material and move completed from Operation 10 to operation 20, not all required claimedHi, we are experiencing issue where the required material quantity is not being claimed in the operation. Currently, the material and moves are done manually from the office. What are some of the reasons/ways to troubleshoot this? Thank you, 

An item was received into Warehouse A with an incorrect unit cost, but it has already been transferred to Warehouse B. The stock item uses the Average Cost method. Can we create an INV Adjustment to adjust item’s cost at warehouse B or we have to transfer it back to Warehouse A to adjust it?