Distribution

Are there any effects on Inventory if we set the Item Warehouse Details but do not wish to use the Acumatica Replenishment. And is it okay to use this form as reference data for 3rd party replenishment application?

I have Kits that contain many common items. currently I stock them as their own SKU instead of being a Kit. the problem is that those components don’t necessarily show up as available to purchase by customers since they are contained in the “kit”. the reverse is true as well for my inventory, If I have all of the components of a Kit, The Kit will not show as available to purchase by customers.Has anyone run into this problem before, do you have any ideas for how to configure the stock items so that they are both visible?

I am creating orders from a mobile application when they are sent to Acumatica and I want to complete the Shipment I get this error message:order does not contain any items planned for shipment on.Is it some field that I am not sending? Best regards,

Hello all,I have been trying to create a PO from SO. I have defined the following parameters:But the option to create PO is still inactive. What is it that I am missing here?

I have Items pertaining to Different Item Class which i need to use diff GL account while Issuing  Item . There is Already an Issue REASON CODE thats is getting used default whenever i make an Issue  . How to stop using reason Code and use COGS Account  from Posting class while Issuing the Item 

Customers are being alerted by FedEx that the development for the FedEx Web Services (SOAP) integration has been discontinued in preparation for its retirement.  FedEx is suggesting to modernize the integration by using the FedEx API (REST) solution.  Does Acumatica have a schedule for the conversion of the FedEx plugin to use the FedEx Rest API services?

Hello Everyone,We are working with 23 R1 build version 23.106.0055.We have a scenario where we need to get the Invoice Status and Released flag status when we are releasing the invoice.On releasing the invoice, the status will change form Balanced to Open. But when we are trying to get the value in Base.Document.Current.Status, we are getting the status as Balanced.At the same time on Invoice Release action, the Released flag will also set to true but when we are trying to access this value we are getting this as false only.On creating invoice directly:On Save action, under Persist method, we observed that Released flag is false.On Invoice release, Persist method triggering 2 times first time Released flag is false and when it triggered second time Released flag is true.On Creating Invoice through Sales Order:On prepare invoice it triggered and release is false

Unlike the orders with SO Order Type, the Create Payment is not Enabled for the MO Types Orders.Is there a settings to change this behavior or do we have a workaround to show the Create Payment when the order is on Hold Status.FYI, in Open status, the Create Payment option is shown. Screenshots: MO order on hold status. the Create Payment is disabled.MO order on Open status. The Create Payment is Enabled.  

We have a situation where landed cost needs to be applied before PO Receipt and landed cost is paid before receipt. Landed Cost Vendor is different from the PO Vendor. Landed Cost paid is to be linked to the PO. Acumatica does not allow Landed Cost creation before PO receipt. Has anybody got an workaround?

Hello all, I have been trying to refresh the rates for FEDex integration but it is throwing the following error:Thanks.

I have invoices that were created using SOInvoice - however I get the error that the PO Error - Document status is invalid for processing.  There is no shipment or so associated with this (think Cash Sale).  What else could it be?  Acumatica is maddening.  

Can anyone provide the qualifications / requirements to be part of the Always Current update program?  We want to join the program.  If we qualifty, how do we join the program? 

This is a request to Acumatica WIKI/Acumatica Help document  team to update the help details for the field - Purchase Receipts - Editable Unit Cost Field.In addition to the existing help details, the Editable Unit Cost checkbox functionality is also controlled by the Vendors - > Purchase Settings → “Allow AP Bill Before Receipt” check box.If the “Allow AP Bill Before Receipt” is Selected for the Vendor, the Purchase Receipt → Editable Unit Cost check box is NOT selected If the “Allow AP Bill Before Receipt”is NOT Selected for the Vendor the Purchase Receipt → Editable Unit Cost check box is NOT selectedExisting help for Purchase receipts - > Editable Unit Cost  

I have a site where this field is disabled, and therefore the user cannot enter the cost in the purchase receipt screen. But I cannot turn it back on and don’t know which settings/feature governs it. The in product help doesn’t mention about it either.

Just started using native WMS functionality and starting to work PIs into the mix.  I am noticing when I can a PI and count a item, it is marking all lines in the PI as entered, even if I did not scan those locations and inventory IDs.  IS there a setting somewhere I am missing.  My assumption was that if I did not scan a location/tag, it would not count as entered.

Good day, We are currently using not all the futures in Acumatica and planning in the next couple of months to implement the Manufacturing module. Did anybody else ever tried to Invoice before shipment?Our company is invoicing the day after the product is produced and before it goes to our sister company to Powdercoat the product. The next day the client will be fully invoiced, the product will be then come back to our main company to be dispatched or fitted after its finished the next product step. Then the system can be marked for shipment. We are fully invoice it so not making a pro forma invoice because this doesn't show all the data on the journals/P&L. Issue we facing is with the ERP is that you can't invoice before shipment only after you marked it for shipment and in our case that isn't how our company is operating.Does anybody have any suggestion how we can solve this before we go live with the next phase

Is there a way to ensure that the cost of goods on a PO that is linked to an SO is passed directly to the SO?Our client is a trader and generally buys for each customer order although they do keep some stock.  Their traders source the goods and then place the SO and PO and they want to ensure that the price of the goods on the PO is the cost that arrives on the sales invoice.  Is there a way to do this while having stock in the system of the same product which is valued according to Average or Fifo? Thanks 

Hello all,I want to get clarification on the differences between Freight Cost & Freight Price.Does the Freight Cost mean the cost that is to be borne by us & freight price to be borne by customers?How can I let the system to only calculate the price to be borne by customers?I have defined the below ship via code:and the Shipping terms:  

We are having an issue sending statements out of Acumatica.  We have O365 implemented.  Some of the emails have 19 attachments totalling 26mb.  We can see the sent messages in our mailbox, but the customers are not receiving them, BUT, if we FORWARD the same email message from our sent box to the customer they DO receive it.  So its not a limitation on our O365, it seems to be a send limit from Acumatica.  Any help on this topic is appreciated.

Hi, I want to enable print option on sales order only after sales order approval. How can I achieve this ?Attached screenshot for reference.   

Researching the possibility of capturing a driver's signature in a Shipment to be able to print Bill of Lading form from it. 

Does anyone have experience connecting signature capture pads (Wacom, Topaz, or similar) to workstations and attaching the signatures to Acumatica transactions?  I’ve been asked about collecting signatures from drivers picking up shipments.  The drivers will be physically present to pick up the load.

Has anyone ever created a new workflow or a customization (I don’t believe there is native functionality) to allow a drop-ship PO to be generated from a Project Sales Order or Transfer Order instead of only the normal SO (Sales Order)?For projects and material staging (in the warehouse and on-site) we won’t be using the regular SO due to not needing to invoice the customer as this will all get invoiced through field service or projects. The ultimate goal is to not have to make a drop ship PO from scratch, as it is important to be linked and generated directly from the order.

I am trying to set up different min/max replenishment cycles for the same item in different warehouses. How would I go about doing that. I only see settings for the Default warehouse.  

Soon to go live on Acumatica, and this is my first post so apologies if this has been answered anywhere.Need:In short, looking for a solution that would allow us to take payment against a Shipment with picked or allocated quantities vs. what Acumatica allows which is only payment against an Order or an Invoice.Scenario:We ship goods based on square footage (leather hides), such that a customer can order 1 hide, but in our Pick/Pack/Ship against a Shipment, we can pick 45square feet, 50square feet or 60square feet - all of which is acceptable in our industry and decided by the Picker.In the case of a prepaid customer, there is no way to take payment against the picked item(s) on the Shipment. My understanding is we have to confirm shipment, create invoice and then take payment against the invoice…..which raises the potential for the Shipper to pack goods up, label them and goods leave our warehouse in advance of payment being received and potentiall