Will this be fixed in a future release? I have the same issue on Build 23.103.0013. Thanks.
A potential workaround solution would be to add a nonstock item to the phantomed subassembly material list that has the part # and description of the part in the BOM Matl Description field. Then when you phantom that subassembly on a production order, the nonstock item with the phantomed subassembly name will show up
I submitted a support case #317477. Thank you!
@nathantrauscht I think @ericwolfe74 may be on to something, but your use case may be different than what I understand about your business at this point. What if your base configuration BOM had the operations you were looking for in the end for your production order, and then you can phantom exclude your option BOMs into that base configuration BOM.Concerning your desire to have the configurator sum up the labor hours from the base configuration plus the hours from the option BOM, that I don’t think is possible. I’m trying to come up with a solution for our trailer manufacturing company, which has many option BOMs with run time. Those options are installed at various work centers in our base configuration BOM, so if operation 10 in work center A in our base configuration has 10 hours of run time, and the customer asks for option X (which adds 5 hours run time in work center A and 2 hours run time in work center B), I wish the configurator could sum up the 10 + 5 hours run time for w
Angie, the Use Default Quantity in Materials preference does not do what I would think. If I have a production order with materials A (qty 5) and B (qty 3), the Scan Materials form attempts to issue the same quantity for every material line as the first line you scan. So if I scan qty 5 of material A, when I scan the B item, it will attempt to issue qty 5 of material B (and, of course, it errors out).I noticed that the “Use Remaining Quantity in Move/Materials” preferences behave differently also. The Scan Move works great when these boxes are checked. If I have two production orders, one for qty 2 and one for qty 4, the Scan Move form behaves properly - it automatically fills in qty 2 and qty 4. The Scan Materials form behaves different when these boxes are checked (I described the issue in my original post.If the above behavior for Use Default Quantity and Use Remaining Quantity is what you expect, I would like to understand why the Scan Materials form does not behave in the sam
Debbie, we do use Phantoms in Bills of Materials, and that works great.What I am talking about is adding a phantom item to an existing production order in production details. Upon save, the materials of the subassembly would blow into the production details.
Thanks Debbie. I created two separate ideas as you suggested.
I understand you can make a report, but then you have to have two separate menu items, one for the GI which can be sorted and filtered on the fly, and one for the report. I think it would be a platform improvement to make all GIs printable where it can grab the currently filtered records and print it in a reasonable format (title of GI at top, current date, user, give selection window for which columns should be printed which would print ratably to their pixel size on the screen).
I found the table: the table that SO Allocation updates is ‘INItemLotSerial’, not ‘INLotSerialStatus’. Tip for others: I tested allocating a serial # to a Sales Order, reviewed the Trace, and on the Save event I noticed you can find in the SQL tab which tables are updated upon saving. That is where I discovered the ‘INItemLotSerial’ table.
I think I got it figured out. I had grace period set to zero, and so Acumatica was thinking the product order needed its own planned order to supply Component B for Subassembly A for the product order. I set grace period to 30 and it took care of the problem.
You might find some of the numbers in the AMProdTotal table helpful. This table is easily related to the AMProdItem table. I have used this table frequently when reporting cost of production.
Debbie, I sent an email Monday, Dec 5 at 10:44am CST. Thought I’d follow up in case it sent to your spam. Thanks!
Thank you for the reply. Mass Actions is not needed, what I am looking for is one-at-a-time Quick Process for a Purchase Order. I’ll suggest it as an idea. Thanks again!
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.