Skip to main content
Question

Lead time for Kits

  • December 16, 2024
  • 2 replies
  • 52 views

dgodsill7348
Jr Varsity I
Forum|alt.badge.img

MRP/DRP seems to ignore the lead time for kits with dependent demand.  The promise date for a subassembly used in  kit should be the action date of the parent item.  In my example, the AMSUBKIT promise date should be the Action Date of AMKIT1

 

2 replies

Forum|alt.badge.img+3
  • Acumatica Employee
  • December 16, 2024

@dgodsill7348

Hi Dennis. Kits do not have a unique lead time available. Kits re-used a lot of stock information from manufacturing sourced items as a starting point and may have used the manufacturing lead time as a quasi lead time for kits inadvertently. Notice that users with DRP but not MRP have this field available. 

If you have MFG and are having multi-level kits, what would be the benefit of using a Kit vs a production order at that point? 

I’m adding ​@angierowley75 as a CC so she is aware of the concern. 


dgodsill7348
Jr Varsity I
Forum|alt.badge.img
  • Author
  • Jr Varsity I
  • December 19, 2024

The benefit is to avoid the cost of the manufacturing edition,  Also, a client is a distributor and does not desire the complexity and multiple steps required for production orders.  Not using the lead time violates the core concept of MRP./DRP, 

For example, the distributor personalize items like name tags, in a an operation and needs to know when to replenish the supply of blank name tags. Other examples would be light assembly of inserting a purchased component into a purchased housing, or flashing software into a PC, tablet, or phone to personalize the unit for the customer.

The ISV solutions for light manufacturing claim to do “MRP” but as you well know, MRP/DRP has many complexities that these ISV packages avoid.