Skip to main content
Solved

INItemSiteHistDay.QtyIn (and QtyOut) not available for formula or selection criteria

  • January 17, 2022
  • 6 replies
  • 143 views

Forum|alt.badge.img+5

I am using INItemSiteHistDay to write a GI for inventory aging.  The field INItemSiteHistDay.QtyIn is available for the results grid.  However, INItemSiteHistDay.QtyIn and INItemSiteHistDay.QtyOut are not available for formulas or selection criteria.  I need the QTY for every transaction in and out of inventory and these seem like the 2 fields I need.  I’m unsure why they are only available to the results grid.

Thanks for any guidance!

Best answer by Naveen Boga

Hi @ltussing03 

INItemSiteHistDay.QtyIn  and INItemSiteHistDay.QtyOut will NOT be available for in GI formulas, because these are NOT bound fields instead of calculated fields dynamically.

If you review the INItemSiteHistDay DAC file, you will understand how calculations are happening for the QtyIn and QtyOut.

 

Formulas: 

QtyIn =  INItemSiteHistDay.qtyReceived + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyTransferIn + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyAssemblyIn

 

QtyOut = INItemSiteHistDay.qtyIssued + INItemSiteHistDay.qtySales + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyCreditMemos + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyTransferOut + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyAssemblyOut

 

In the GI formula, you can use the above fields instead of QtyIN and QtyOut.

 

Hope this helps!!

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

6 replies

Naveen Boga
Captain II
Forum|alt.badge.img+19
  • Captain II
  • 3410 replies
  • Answer
  • January 17, 2022

Hi @ltussing03 

INItemSiteHistDay.QtyIn  and INItemSiteHistDay.QtyOut will NOT be available for in GI formulas, because these are NOT bound fields instead of calculated fields dynamically.

If you review the INItemSiteHistDay DAC file, you will understand how calculations are happening for the QtyIn and QtyOut.

 

Formulas: 

QtyIn =  INItemSiteHistDay.qtyReceived + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyTransferIn + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyAssemblyIn

 

QtyOut = INItemSiteHistDay.qtyIssued + INItemSiteHistDay.qtySales + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyCreditMemos + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyTransferOut + INItemSiteHistDay.qtyAssemblyOut

 

In the GI formula, you can use the above fields instead of QtyIN and QtyOut.

 

Hope this helps!!


Forum|alt.badge.img+5
  • Author
  • Captain II
  • 292 replies
  • January 17, 2022

It sure does help!

 

THANSK!


dougmcbride79
Semi-Pro I
Forum|alt.badge.img

So many of Acumatica users are in need of an inventory aging report.  If you are so inclined, please tell us more about your report and how it is working.  


  • Freshman I
  • 5 replies
  • February 10, 2022

Hey @ltussing03  were you able to create a report for aging? I’ve been trying to create a GI and have been unsuccessful.

 

Landon


  • Jr Varsity III
  • 21 replies
  • February 10, 2022

@ipenrod - Check out Tim Rodman’s Generic Inquiry and Pivot tables course.  He has an example of how to create an Inventory Aging Report in his appendix of Tips and Tricks.


Hello,

A little late on the conversation but I just saw the Inventory Aging report (by Tim) mentioned above and it says it does not work with Std or Avg cost valuation methods. Does anyone have come up with a GI for “As Of” valuation by time frame (day, is what I need) when using Std or Avg? 

If so, would you tell me the tables to join, or better yet, can you share the XML? 

Thank you very much,

Rgds,

Claudio


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings