I tried to manage this by making sure all vendors had 1099 boxes declared. The below issue still exists:if the vendor 1099 box default is filled and a non-stock item is routed to an account that is not specified on the Accounts Payable Preferences > 1099 settings tab then when these items are entered on a bill for the 1099 vendor, the line will clear the 1099 box field. This means for 1099 reports to work, all bill line items (freight, fuel service charges, service fees, etc.) must be routed to a single GL expense account which is listed in the Accounts Payable Preferences > 1099 settings tab. Furthermore, misc service expenses like cleaning service, software design, equipment repairs etc must all be routed to the lone GL expense account which is designated as the 1099 NEC account. Am I missing something?
Hi @vkumarThank you for the prompt reply. That helps me to clarify my starting point.Best,
Had this issue upgrading from 21.203.0030 to 21.215.0016.
I am also unable to get an automation of the print statements to send emails despite no trouble when I manually use screen AR.50.35.00.
Naveen and Fernando, I believe you were both after the same thing. After encapsulating in the long op, the graph updated automatically and works great. Thanks! Shawn, I’d not had the time to figure out what I was getting wrong with the long op originally, and cancelling the graph was a good work around in the mean time, so thank you also for the input.
@xkylewrightx I don’t know if you found a solution to this or not, but what I ended up doing was creating a sub-report based just on the ARStatement table that mirrored the footer of the original statement, and passing the customer and date to it to get the totals for both branches since I couldn’t ignore the branches and also get the variables to add up the totals properly.
Thank you. That was the ticket!
Just for closure:This worked to give permission to the local C:/user/... folder that was previously denied.However with a folder that lives on a Synology NAS, the properties/permissions/locations in windows do not include the local machine, so IIS AppPools can’t be granted permission. Only entities from the greater domain or local to the NAS.
False alarm. The one payment was being filtered by a wrong VendorClassID
Thank you, Keith. That did it.
@xkylewrightx I don’t know if you found a solution to this or not, but what I ended up doing was creating a sub-report based just on the ARStatement table that mirrored the footer of the original statement, and passing the customer and date to it to get the totals for both branches since I couldn’t ignore the branches and also get the variables to add up the totals properly. We did the same and it works on a per-report basis when accessing through the Report form - however, we’ve noticed that the report breaks when using the Print Statements or Email Statements screen. I was wondering if you managed to resolve this issue? @kokjietan We send statements in bulk via the Email Statements function and I believe ours is working. I don’t recall having to troubleshoot that issue, though. Can you describe a little more how it’s breaking?
@Joe Schmucker or anyone really… Do we know; are we supposed to have the ability to generate custom screens in the modern UI at this point, or are we limited to playing with those that come default under FrontendSources?Reading the documentation, they use all default screens in their examples, so its unclear to me if they are instructing us only how to recompile default screens after modification or telling us we can do this with any screen and they just use default screens as examples. After dealing with a “cross-env is not recognized” error using npm install --save-dev cross-env I was able to get npm run build-dev -- --env screenIds=|custom screen| to run successfully with no errors, but it didn’t generate the FrontendSoures files for my custom screen. I very well may be missing something, but I thought it worth asking the question before I burn time on another 100 derivatives.
Even if we did have to build the html and ts ourselves, at least there is documentation for that. But there’s still the issue that when you attempt to switch a screen to the Modern UI, the site map is locked down to search for |screenID|.html in the ./Scripts/Screens directory before it ever references the ./FrontendSources files.The default screens all have corresponding html and js files in the ./Scripts/Screens directory, but there’s no documentation that I’ve found that explains how to generate these for custom screens, which tells me either we’ve not yet been provided with this option yet, or else it’s something that is supposed to be handled programmatically, and I’ve simply botched the deployment.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.