Inventory, Orders Management, Warehouse Operations
- 1,421 Topics
- 5,509 Replies
When we process the Transfer Order using the MRP Display screen, the line falls off immediately, but when we Regen the MRP, it comes back. Why does it come back when there is a Transfer Order in for it? The Transfer Order is from the Sales Order, which creates a Demand type, not a supply type. But shouldn’t that create a new line of demand on the MRP Display? It does not create a new line, it only brings back the same line we just selected and created the Transfer Order from. Is there a setting to get that line to stay off after transacting against it? Or is there a way to make MRP create a Transfer Order that would look like supply and link it to the Sales Order that it was processed for?
HI everyone,I have a customer implementing Acumatica and they have a need to be able to ship from various warehouses on the same order. They need to be able to keep track of inventory though. If we used the buildings in Acumatica, what is the best way to process this?The Building Name would be Main, then each warehouse would be A, B, C?Does anyone have thoughts or ways to work around not being able to combine warehouses on shipments?
Hi @everyone,Can't receive transfer order. It shows in-transit, but when I go to the receipt page it doesn't find the TO number. We need 100% of units received. I started to create a receipt for this TO, and then aborted to confirm something. Now the TO can't be found from the receipt screen, so I imagine I screwed it up when I aborted.
Are we able to set up a Create Shipment automation schedule that creates a shipment based on the sched shipment date/request date earlier than the actual shipment date? Ex.Sched Shipment Date/Request Date is June 20th.We want the shipment to be created on June 18th with a shipment date of June 20th. So when June 20th rolls around, we just have our warehousing team confirm the shipment on its way out. I’d expect this to be easy to set up but seems as though this processing screen only works on the day of shipment? I must be missing something here.
Trying to send out payment notification emails and receiving the following error: “The email message has not been sent. See the following error message for more information: CR Error: Email send failed. Source notification object not defined to proceed operation..” Has anyone seen this before?
Hello Everyone,We are looking for to adopt a 7 segment inventory id. One of the segment is Item Class. Thinking about using Attributes and make the id created automatically. Its not clear on how the ids get created using attributes and segments. Already referred Matrix items, Templates as part of the research. Has anyone went through a process of multi segment inventory id. how easy is to create and maintain the records? Is there any value on creating multi segment like for any reporting? Ease of use, read challenge, etc. Any challenges that we should be aware of. Appreciate any insight.Thanks,
We have an issue wherein we may enter part of a Sales Order, or the full order, and then place it on hold awaiting some further information. The Sales Order may be on hold for several days. We are on 22R1 Build 22.119.0027 When you go to Prepare Replenishment, however, the replenishment calculation seems to include all orders, including those on hold, in the demand numbers. This can cause inventory buyers to purchase items that may not be needed because we have changed the Sales Order lines or quantities before releasing it from On Hold status. Is there a setting to have Replenishment ignore demand from On Hold Sales Order, much like the Inventory Availability Calculation Rules can be configured for various scenarios. Alternately, it would be useful to have a “Draft” Sales Order Status where the order is not visible at all to other modules in the system until the Sales Order is released. Has anyone else struggled with this scenario or had successful workarounds? Thanks in advance.
Version 2021R2. We get an EDI 850 from the client. We produce a sales order in Acumatica using True Commerce APIs. Later, our customer sends us an EDI 860 modification order. Our company Tripp Shrooms does not want the previous sales order in Acumatica to automatically be updated with this change order.Instead, our company requests that we create an exception report that details the information contained in the 860 (such as the header information and line item data) and creates error messages if the sales order on Acumatica differs from the 860 change order. Give an exception message, for instance, if the amount of a line item has changed or if a new line item has been added to the sales order. The customer service representative would receive this exception report. who would examine the modifications and, if approved, manually enter them on the Acumatica sales order.Has software been developed that can generate unique change order tables (header, lines, and notes) and then compare the
Hey all, looking for any sort of advice on this issue! On the Inventory Transaction History Screen (IN405000) after entering the Inventory ID my results have one line that is out of order by date. Sort Ascending works to get the lines in the correct order but I am curios if there is a way to have it Sort Ascending by default. Another thing worth noting is that whenever the Include Unreleased checkbox in the summary area is select it also fixes the sorting issue, thanks!
Is it possible to have different letterhead populate on forms (Sales Order Confirmation, Shipment Confirmation) based on order type? We are acquiring a new brand and would like to avoid having a separate branch but would still like to have the ability to have the branding different based on the order. Is this possible?
I have an open shipment, but when I go to Show Pick List then hit delete pick list, I get an abort error: Unable to reset abort because no abort was requested. Trace Log Says: Thoughts on what’s amiss here? The Pick list has a status of PICKED, but I didn’t think that would block us or anything since the Shipment isn’t confirmed.Version:Acumatica 2022 R1Build 22.107.0022
Does anyone know how to make the Qty to Supply field in Prepare Replenishment round down? Currently any decimal amounts for parts with a UOM of ‘EACH’ is round up to the nearest whole amount. We would like it to round down. Is there a way to do this?
When creating multiple AP Bill for a single Service PO, the quantity for the second AP Bill appears as 0.00 by default. I have done the following setups but am wondering if I missed anything, as logically, if the PO is still open (and set PO Line to close by Amount) then irrespective to the number of AP Bills the quantity should repeat at 1 (unless Acumatica defaults is 0.00 - can this be changed).Below is the scenario, using Acumatica demo data.Non-stock Item setup: Close PO Line: By AmountPO created for 1 unit at unit cost of USD20001st partial AP Bill created for USD 800.00. Quantity 1 automatically appears when creating AP Bill and ADD PO or convert PO to AP Bill and update amount.2nd partial AP Bill when created from PO to Enter AP Bill or from the AP Bill and ADD PO screens, both options display Quantity as 0.00Shouldn’t the quantity still reflect as 1? How or what can I do to allow the default quantity to be 1 in the above scenario until the amount in the PO is 0.00 or closed.
We use kits in Acumatica and send the kit SKU to Shopify. We need a way to automate the update of kit inventory in Shopify using the Acumatica Shopify connector. Is there an app in Shopify that will maintain the kit components? Can the kit component inventory be sent and received with Shopify via the connector?
Hi, Is there any way to assign automatically Project X to all Bills when the landed cost is released? I know that there’s a AP Setup Configuration called RequireSingleProjectPerDocument that can be activated, it works well but when I enter an AP from Bills and Adjustment I could not change the project field because it is locked. I was trying to override the method: CreateLandedCostBill on the graph POLandedCostDocEntry but I’m a little lost to identify in wich part i should put the APTran.ProjectID= ProjectDefaultAttribute.NonProject();Is this the correct way to achieve it? The idea is that when the user enter the AP Bill he can modify this value and when I release the landed cost document with the Enter AP Bill Checked , the AP Document will have the X value on ProjectID field. Please let me know any ideas how I can achieve it?
Hi, I need to disable all the notes and files in every single form. I could not find this in Access control level and How could I facilitate this? I referred those two links. https://community.acumatica.com/develop-customizations-288/prevent-updates-of-notes-and-files-if-the-transactions-are-in-released-status-conditionally-13791https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35664927/prevent-update-of-note-files-on-disabled-views Could we make a import scenario and make the updates? or Is this a customization? RegardsNethupul
Login to the community
Social LoginLogin with your Acumatica account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.