@kbeatty21Yeah, that’s what isn’t a good or scalable solution for us. You can’t edit your User Profile on the Mobile App and an admin can’t edit someone else’s User Profile without logging in as them. Further, those fields aren’t available to edit on a GI. So, if I need warehouse user Bob to pack on a different lane today:He needs to go to a workstation and log in Edit his user profile Change his default printer Change the printer on any specific reports (e.g. Shipment Confirm)Or, an Admin needs to log in as Bob and do that for him. I have 22 warehouse employees in 2 locations and 7 shipping lanes with two printers on each. Not a sustainable solution. Thanks- Jacob.
@rosenjon I am a programmer (and have a team of them available). A Timestamp to the millisecond appended to the file name should be sufficient, unless there are some unknown filename length constraints with DeviceHub. We are still new with acumatica and haven’t done much customization (and nothing yet with dnSpy). Any insights would be helpful!
@rosenjonDuplicate production tracking numbers are more common than you think. I have over 250,000 from the last 8 years, some with a window as small as 9 months and an average window of about 3.5 years.
@rosenjon The “This File Already Exists” error reoccurs. UPS test mode returns a Tracking Number of “1ZXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX” for all labels. That file gets stored with a name of “Label #1ZXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.ZPL” So, the moment I run a second Test Label, I get the “File Already Exists” error.
Because the file name for the UPS Label is based on the Tracking Number, this: Breaks immediately when testing (because the tracking numbers are all “1ZXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX “ Will break within 9 months for a high-volume shipper because of UPS re-using tracking numbers.Is there a way to manipulate the filename so that it’s always unique?
Hi @Dana Moffat, I would be happy to participate.
Slight refinement to this process:Set the “Applied to Order” on the payment to 0 Set the Discount Percentage or Amount on the line. (we don’t use the defined discounts) Recalculate Taxes Set the “Applied to Order” to the correct amount. Save. Click the “Payment Reference Number” to open the corresponding Payment. Three dots menu → Refund. This will create and open the A/R Customer Refund document for the unapplied amount on the Payment. Remove Hold. (status is now “pending processing”) Three dots menu → Refund Card Payment. Wonder if there is a way to do step 9 in bulk / on a schedule so the Customer Refund documents can accumulate and then all be processed at the end of the day.
Thanks for taking the time to lay this out @kbeatty21 The one major concern we have with the reprocess model is that, for a retail customer, it creates a double lock on their available funds that lasts an indeterminate amount of time. Further, if the funds have already settled (ours settle in < 4 hours), a void is not possible and it must be a refund prior to the reprocess.For example, you place an order for $100. Funds are captured. We issue a full refund. Depending on your bank, that $100 may remain locked for up to 7 business days. We process again post 10% discount, now we’ve locked up $190 on your card. There’s no guarantee that the second transaction will even make it through.I’ve been tinkering on this for a few days and I think the solution will end up being to update the line to reflect the discount, adjust the payment amount applied to the order so as to create a Credit on the Customer account and then process an A/R Credit memo for a refund after posting. Just sup
Where did you ultimately decide to store the DropShip PO Tracking Number? I am struggling with this. Did you create a fake package on the Shipment? Thanks- Jacob.
Hi @kbeatty21, I’m still new to Acumatica, so I may be naive here, but I don’t think that does it either: Vendor Inventory configured on the left, PO with a different item on the right. Also, the documentation for vendor inventory says “In addition, based on purchases of items from the vendor, the system may automatically add items to the vendor catalog (if they were not already listed for the vendor) “. Would love an option to make this not happen. Thanks,Jacob.
Thanks @kbeatty21, but that’s a different issue. For this one, if I’m creating a purchase order to order shoes from Nike, I don’t want the user to be able to put Adidas shoes on it. But I also don’t want to prevent that user from later creating an Adidas PO full of Adidas shoes. The Add Items dialog does the filtering already, was just hoping that there was additional validation on grid entry or sheet upload. Thanks for your help!
I don’t think that will solve this problem, but I might not be understanding. Row Level Security is for restricting visibility, not restricting actions, right?I don’t want my users to not be able to see an item or a vendor. I want them to not be able to select “DROPSHIP” in the PO Source DropDown on the Sales Order line item if the inventory item is somehow marked as unavailable for DropShip. Does that make sense?
Did you ever find a good solution for this? I have the same need.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.