Thanks for communicating this possible solution Gabriel, and the fantastic impromptu demonstration!
@joelhoffman @mike.gillum Have either of you encountered this use-case before?
@joelhoffman @mike.gillum Thanks for the feedback, greatly appreciated! I’ll post a summary of our experience later if we decide to pursue this.
@GrahamMartin We’re still evaluating it with 2020 R2, haven’t tried it yet with 2021 R1.
@hsarjapur You mentioned the Survey team is collaborating for Phase 3. Can you share what features are being considered and the schedule for release? I’m interested in learning if functionality will be provided to allow surveys to be completed by service techs upon completion of appointments in Field Services Edition.
@hsarjapur Fantastic, I’ll be there!
@brianstevens Unfortunately no one has suggested ways to accomplish this. I’ve also come up empty asking my colleagues. I’m assuming it can only be handled procedurally somehow.
@brianstevens I submitted product idea Document approvals: option to reassign. Please add your requirements.
Thanks @hsarjapur, we’ll take a look at this method.
@rherbelin85 I’m trying to configure a similar use case. Have you figured it out yourself since no one provided advice here? There’s unfortunately no useful explanations in Acumatica Help on how to use decision wait time and Acumatica Support acknowledged there are no courses available for approval map training.
I discovered I incorrectly stated the expected count for Value 3, it should be 2 not 3.
@ashtonwilliams96 I see you didn’t get any responses to this question...have you decided which technique to use? I have a similar requirement, I’m wondering about the criteria that influenced your decision.
I see AcumaticaSurveys21R2 v3.2.2 was posted in GitHub on Oct 5 but don’t see any documentation describing new features. Please advise.
@cindywhitner76 - I encountered Issue 2 working with a client using 22.107.0022. I see it’s documented as known issue AC-250972. 22R1 Update 16 was released on Nov. 29 but I don’t see a fix mentioned in the release notes. I double-checked this by upgrading a test site to Update 16; I confirmed it doesn't include a fix. Can you provide a new target 2022 R1 build, and a target 2022 R2 build? I'm planning to upgrade my client to 2022 R2 soon.
@Irina The link you posted to a step-by-step guide for another form having a tree structure, Budget Configuration appears to be invalid. I’m not able to access the guide. Can you provide a valid link?
@sweta68 I also encountered this error yesterday. I successfully restored the snapshot after deleting the conflicting record. I was able to delete it because I was restoring to an on-premise tenant for which I have access to the database. Several related questions: how would I resolve this if encountered restoring in an Acumatica-hosted SaaS tenant for which I don’t have access to the database. Is there a remedy other than submitted a support case to have the Acumatica Support team delete it? What causes this situation, how can it be avoided?
@Leif The client for whom I submitted this question decided to not pursue it, so I didn’t attempt hsarjapur’s suggestion.
@leif Please you post a link to your new question here. I wish to follow it in case I need to revisit this need.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.