Skip to main content
Solved

Customized field value not indicating in the GI After the system upgrade from 2022 R2 to 2023 R2

  • April 24, 2024
  • 1 reply
  • 32 views

Prasadug
Jr Varsity II
Forum|alt.badge.img

Hi,

One of customized field values are not indication after the system upgrading in the system, which is a text customized field and the field name is UsrShipment_Num.  other text customized fields are working without any errors which are same to the mentioned earlier. 

Is the issue arised due to the underscore ( _ ) symbol?

what can I do for correct this issue?

Please advise on this

 

Thanks

Prasad

Best answer by jamesh

Hi @Prasadug,

After reviewing the release notes for 2023 R1, significant changes were made that could potentially affect the visibility or functionality of your custom fields. Notably, the performance improvements involved moving more than 100 database columns from extension tables to their parent tables. These changes are significant because any customizations, reports, or Generic Inquiries that referenced the affected extension tables might need to be updated to reflect the new schema.

Since the database schema has changed, specifically with columns being moved from extension tables to their parent tables, you need to verify if the table or column where UsrShipment_Num is stored has been affected. Check if the field's table or its relations have been modified in the upgrade.

Any customization or Generic Inquiry that previously referenced moved or modified columns needs to be reviewed and potentially adjusted. This is crucial for ensuring that your custom field correctly references the new table structure. You’ll essentially want to make sure you’re referencing an existing DAC, or point it to a new one.

Given the extent of database schema changes, consider rebuilding indexes, especially if the system suggests that the search index may become outdated post-upgrade. This can help in improving the visibility and responsiveness of new and adjusted fields in queries and Generic Inquiries .

 

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

1 reply

jamesh
Semi-Pro I
Forum|alt.badge.img+7
  • Semi-Pro I
  • 177 replies
  • Answer
  • April 24, 2024

Hi @Prasadug,

After reviewing the release notes for 2023 R1, significant changes were made that could potentially affect the visibility or functionality of your custom fields. Notably, the performance improvements involved moving more than 100 database columns from extension tables to their parent tables. These changes are significant because any customizations, reports, or Generic Inquiries that referenced the affected extension tables might need to be updated to reflect the new schema.

Since the database schema has changed, specifically with columns being moved from extension tables to their parent tables, you need to verify if the table or column where UsrShipment_Num is stored has been affected. Check if the field's table or its relations have been modified in the upgrade.

Any customization or Generic Inquiry that previously referenced moved or modified columns needs to be reviewed and potentially adjusted. This is crucial for ensuring that your custom field correctly references the new table structure. You’ll essentially want to make sure you’re referencing an existing DAC, or point it to a new one.

Given the extent of database schema changes, consider rebuilding indexes, especially if the system suggests that the search index may become outdated post-upgrade. This can help in improving the visibility and responsiveness of new and adjusted fields in queries and Generic Inquiries .

 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings