Skip to main content
Solved

Banks Feeds Issues with Check Numbers


Hi, is there anyone that has had success bringing in check numbers from a corporate checking account into Acumatica bank feeds (via MX or Plaid)? Our current bank feed with current bank only shows the word “check” with no actual check numbers.

 

Also have a number of corporate credit cards who will no longer be supported via MX or Plaid through my bank

 

Curious which banks anyone has successfully accomplished this functionality (JP Morgan, Bank of America, Truist, etc)

Best answer by KushaniPerera88

If the check number needs to be captured into the existing column (check number column) Then this could be mapped to an unexpected field in the process bank transaction screen

Please note that this feature (custom field mapping) is only available from 23R2 onward

See below from release note

 

 

View original
Did this topic help you find an answer to your question?

5 replies

KushaniPerera88
Acumatica Employee
Forum|alt.badge.img+1
  • Acumatica Employee
  • 50 replies
  • Answer
  • May 12, 2024

If the check number needs to be captured into the existing column (check number column) Then this could be mapped to an unexpected field in the process bank transaction screen

Please note that this feature (custom field mapping) is only available from 23R2 onward

See below from release note

 

 


  • Author
  • Freshman I
  • 5 replies
  • May 16, 2024

@KushaniPerera88 we actually upgraded to 2023R2 in hopes that this new feature would work, however the field still has no data to be mapped. I think this has to do with our bank.

 

Might resort to setting up a new checking account with another bank. Curious if anyone has had success with this with other banks - and if so which banks


  • Freshman I
  • 8 replies
  • May 22, 2024

We have been in the middle of implementation for a year (yet to go live). We have the same issue - We use Plaid and cheque numbers do not show, just the word “check”. The Auto match for reconciling cheques wouldn't obviously work because of the missing cheque “numbers”. 

 

We are in Canada and using Canadian localized version of the ERP.  


  • Freshman I
  • 8 replies
  • May 24, 2024
paragshah wrote:

We have been in the middle of implementation for a year (yet to go live). We have the same issue - We use Plaid and cheque numbers do not show, just the word “check”. The Auto match for reconciling cheques wouldn't obviously work because of the missing cheque “numbers”. 

 

We are in Canada and using Canadian localized version of the ERP.  

Correction - We use MX. (not Plaid).


  • Author
  • Freshman I
  • 5 replies
  • July 26, 2024
KushaniPerera88 wrote:

If the check number needs to be captured into the existing column (check number column) Then this could be mapped to an unexpected field in the process bank transaction screen

Please note that this feature (custom field mapping) is only available from 23R2 onward

See below from release note

 

 

Thank you for this. We actually tried this approach and no luck getting check numbers. This had to do with the way our bank was talking with MX and check number data not getting pulled through. We ended up switching banks to solve the issue


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings