Hi @mrivera67 

Step 1: You create Case Classes corresponding to your Case types (Customer Complaint; Product Documentation Request)

Step 2: You create "Generic Inquiry" for each type of Case. This "Generic Inquiry" you create using the Copy feature from "Generic Inquiry" of Cases.

Create conditions for each Case type corresponding to the created Case Class

Step 3: Create User Roles > Add Users to these User Roles > assign permissions to User Roles used Case Types created in Step 2

Step 4: When creating Case. Each employee must choose their correct Case Class (types of Cases).

Best Regards,

NNT

thank you!

Hi NNT,

I try this and it worked a bit only...so the GI woud not list the case type not assigned to the user but if they click on an authorised case based on case type and then they click on the magnifying glass, the complete list of cases still shows up...is there a way that the list is also restricted based on the authorised case type?

Kind regards,
mrivera67

Hi @mrivera67 

You need to take the following additional steps:

Step 5: Create GI (Case All) exactly the same as GI (Cases). Then assign this GI (Case All) permission to Users who can see all types of Cases.

Step 6: Create conditions for GI (Cases) so that only Users who are owners of Cases can see this GI (Cases)

Step 7: Creating a User Role and assigning rights to the User Role cannot perform the go to "First", "Last", "Next", "Previous" features on the Cases screen. Assign this User Role to Users who only see case types: Customer Complaint; Product Documentation Request.
The reason for creating this Users Role is so that Users of Cases types cannot click to view Cases of other Cases types on the Cases screen.

Best Regards,

NNT

Hi! I tried something like this for some records and wanted to share with you a warning:

Because the user has access to the screen (Cases), he can search for any case number in the general search bar of Acumatica and will have access to it.

I haven’t found a way to restrict access to the search bar to avoid this. If anyone knows how to solve this loophole this would be a perfect solution.