Skip to main content
Question

Material on Hand Payment to Subcontractor

  • April 2, 2025
  • 1 reply
  • 17 views

Forum|alt.badge.img

How are people handling Material on Hand (stored Material) payment to a subcontractor? 

If I pay the subcontractor through their subcontract, it shows they completed units, which really isn’t correct.  

You can override the amount box on the invoice, but I am afraid that would cause issues down the line and be cause for missed payment and confusion from subcontractors and office staff.

 

My proposed solution is to create a change order for 0 units and LS cost.  This will show an overpayment of planned units on that line, and when we are actually paid (and stored material reduced) it will back down to zero dollars for the MOH line and positive on the actual work completed line.

Any other thoughts?

 

Thanks,
Jeremy

 

 

1 reply

chameera71
Varsity I
Forum|alt.badge.img+2
  • Varsity I
  • 60 replies
  • April 10, 2025

In order to handle Material on Hand (MOH) payments to the subcontractors in Acumatica, creating a change order with zero units and a lump sum (LS) cost. This approach prevents discrepancies in the invoicing and avoids manual adjustments. It shows overpayment for planned units, and when the actual payment is made and stored materials are reduced, the MOH line will adjust to zero while reflecting the correct payment for work completed. It seems like this method ensures accuracy and avoids confussion for both subcontractors and office staffs.

Did you try this out yet ?

 


Reply


Cookie policy

We use cookies to enhance and personalize your experience. If you accept you agree to our full cookie policy. Learn more about our cookies.

 
Cookie settings