Thanks for that input and this is useful feature. What I am trying to accomplish is to have an import scenario automatically trigger the “Create Matrix Item” action without having to pass all the combinations of child items. When you launch the screen IN203500 manually you pass in two values the Template ID, and the “AdditionalAttibute” if required. You also need an action to flag all options. The import should pass values for three fieldsBased on the examples I have seen, it is not possible to pass this required data. So we have to build out large excel sheets to meet this need. This introduces the chance of many errors. Am I missing something?ThanksGary
This import scenario is helpful if you haven’t already defined the template items in the system. In our case we have all the template items defined and each matrix item will include all options of the template item. We have about 250 template items with three variants. To create one matrix item I have to populate 56 lines of the excel sheet. When I look at the create matrix item screen it appears that the screen needs three pieces of information, the column attribute, the row attribute and the additional attribute. In my case we have one. I was opening that we could setup an import to pass this limited information and have the screen generate all the combinations. The import does not appear to support passing that type of information. I don’t see a select all column option and I can’t define the additional attribute.Is this possible?
Shannon Yes this is without payroll. I have not tested it with payroll but I suspect it could be a similar issue because the problem is with the release of the Time Entry into project transactions. You see the detail in the project transaction posting but the batch number is not assigned to the X line because that portion is dropped from the GL posting. Everywhere else in the product when an X line is part of the posting the X line carries through to the GL. I would think this makes a reconciliation between the payroll expense accrual account and your payroll entry even more difficult then it needs to be.
We need to have this resolved. I just checked in 2022 R1 and it appears to work the same way. Releasing time to a project and some non-project time. Time on projects posts to the GL non project time just drops off and does not post.
Under this new structure did we loose the ability to setup a test tenant? I also agree this is going to slow down implementations tremendously as we have to deal with the management of remote systems to allow for proper testing and deployment to a live environment. Once live it is nice to have a test environment, we use the “Test Tenant” concept with our small business customers, can we do the same with other deployments?
My concern is not with non project related records, my question is if the account is going to be based on a cost center and if I am correct, cost centers only exist in the construction edition, then what account will not construction edition projects use for this process? Thanks
Thanks for the quick response this is exactly what I need.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.