when you create the labor transaction afterwards, it should still bring in the costs. you just want to make sure that you are not closing the production order until all of the time cards have been entered. There will be a time delay, but the only other way to do it would be to backflush labor and not worry about actuals (not ideal if you are trying to capture your variances accurately).
I see, I misread your question. I don’t have a good answer on that one right now unfortunately.
We have a client who is looking to do something similar, and I was just about to ask a similar question. @bryanb39 you mentioned that having different physical count types to limit the interruptions which was my suggestion to the client. They wanted to know if they could create a type that would allow them to add a location on the fly and I couldn’t seem to come up with a good solution for them. It would be nice if you could do a location based inventory cycle, or create one that would allow you to manually select locations, instead of bringing everything in and then EXCLUDING the ones that you want. even if they are excluded, it still freezes inventory. Having 1 cycle per location seems to be going to the opposite extreme. There has to be a way, but I can’t seem to put my finger on the easiest solution.
You could use workgroups instead of employees. then assign each employee to the work group.
Use tranDesc not inventoryID_Description.
@Dana Moffat is there any thought about adding item class and possibly primary vendor to this dead stock report? given that you can’t modify it, and you can’t see the item class when you get results, it seems silly that you have a filter for the item class. It seems like this would be a very easy change for Acumatica to get pushed out.
@Dana Moffat the item class seems like a no brainer, because if you already have it as a filter criteria but it doesn’t show you this information in the display. if you are using subclass and you want to look at everything, you do not have the option of filtering by contains XXX- or anything like that. Showing the item class field in the details would allow for this. The preferred vendor or last vendor could provide some insight if you are making vendor criteria selections but not as necessary. As a note, the inventory turnover inquiry also doesn’t have the item class on the details but it is on the header filter information as well.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.