Get inspired and gain all the knowledge you need
Recently active
I need to prevent some sales invoices from being emailed. I have tried clicked the “Don’t email” checkbox on the Financial tab. But, this action seems to have no effect.Is there a configuration that needs to be set? Or, is the checkbox just informational for users?If it makes a difference - I plan to check this checkbox via the API.
I need to convert following Json output into List. Can someone help me?[{"VendorCode":"V000000001","UTRNo":"T045353","IsValid":true,"VendorTypeID":1},{"VendorCode":"V000000002","UTRNo":"S569000","IsValid":true,"VendorTypeID":2},{"VendorCode":"V000000003","UTRNo":"S569000","IsValid":false,"VendorTypeID":2}]This is my code.protected virtual IEnumerable verifyVendor(PXAdapter adapter){ HMRCAPIConfigDetail hMRCAPIConfigDetail = SelectFrom<HMRCAPIConfigDetail>.Where<HMRCAPIConfigDetail.active.IsEqual<True>>.View.Select(this) ; if (hMRCAPIConfigDetail == null) { WebDialogResult result = VendorRegisterDetail.Ask(ActionsMessages.Warning, Messages.APIActiveErrorMessage, MessageButtons.OK, MessageIcon.Warning, true); } else { var client = new RestClient(); var request = new RestRequest(hMRCAPIConfigDetail.Apibaseurl, Method.GE
Using Build 23.108.The SO Sales Order Type is set up to Require Customer Order Nbr. with Allow Duplicates Validation.When we attempt to Create a Child Order from a Blanket Order, we get error “The customer order number cannot be empty.”.We were expecting Acumatica to copy the Blanket Order Customer Order Nbr to the Child Order, but this is not the case, so the child order creation step fails.We are forced to create the SO first, type the Customer Order Nbr., and then use action ADD BLANKET SO LINE, which is not an ideal workflow.Any ideas to improve this workflow?Thanks
Hi,In a project, we have a cost in actual, let say :Original cost Laptop 1ea 500 =500 Total in actual cost balances =500 We did a Proforma with some row Status setted at Hold remainder with a amount less than the cost. We released it. :Hold remainder Latptop 1ea 400 =400 I remarked that since it’s done, i have the expense row twice in the actual cost( one for the original transaction, one for the Unbilled Remainder). Hold remainder Latptop 0ea 100 =100 Original cost Laptop 1ea 500 =500 Total in actual cost balances =600😶 I saw in help this :I dont see at the moment any reversal transaction.So, at this moment there is a problem my expense balance isnt good because it sum up both amount. I said to myself that possibly they (developer) have thought of reversing it on the next invoice. So I did the next invoice, a write off the remainder, and now, the Reversal transaction appear.So, Now we have good expenses balances.Hol
Hello! We have AP bills that we are trying to put in and apply retention to put it’s not working. Some have commitments tied to them, some don’t. We click the “apply retention” button and nothing is working. Can someone help? Seems like we’re doing something wrong.
I have two customizations. The main customization add fields for Margin and Margin % for the Quotes screen. This is the C# Code declaring them: #region UsrASGMarginPercent [PXDBDecimal] [PXUIField(DisplayName = "Margin %", Enabled = false)] public virtual decimal? UsrASGMarginPercent { get; set; } public abstract class usrASGMarginPercent : PX.Data.BQL.BqlDecimal.Field<usrASGMarginPercent> { } #endregion #region UsrASGMarginCury [PXDBDecimal] [PXUIField(DisplayName = "Margin", Enabled = false)] public virtual decimal? UsrASGMarginCury { get; set; } public abstract class usrASGMarginCury : PX.Data.BQL.BqlDecimal.Field<usrASGMarginCury> { } #endregionIn the second Customization, I have added a field for Markup: #region UsrASGMarkup [PXDBDecimal] [PXUIField(DisplayName = "Markup ", Enabled = false)] public virtual decimal? UsrASGMarkup { get; set; } public abs
Morning All, My working environment is a machinist shop for the aviation industry. We use “clock entries” to account for for the machinist time when they are working on production orders. The process is this a machinist physically has the production order on his person. They proceed to a scanning station and scan both their id card and production order to acknowledged they are working on the production order and whatever work center was assigned to them. At this point no other machinist should be able to scan the same production order(physical part) and work on a different work center. But it happen last week. Please, see the embedded picture. How can this be prevented? We are currently using Acumatica 2022 R1. We will be upgrading in few weeks to next the version of Acumatica.
We want to use the shipping label that has an extra removable tab at the top. Fedex wants to see"label_size": "4X6.75_TRAILING_DOC_TAB"We are using the Easypost API and it doesn’t support this size, the closest is regular 4x6. Easypost supports it but the API doesn’t. Has anyone managed to use this label size with any of the carrier integrations?
Hi. How Can I add NoteID and ScheduleID in Invoice api?
Hi – In Acumatica, I can see automated operations features such as Receive and Put Away, however I can’t see Scan Move, Scan Labour, and Scan Materials. My questions are:How do I enable these features? Are there any Acumatica University tutorials on these topics? (I can’t find any) Is there any Acumatica documentation on these topics?
Hi Team, I have added Project Generic Inquiry (PM3010PL) in Acumatica Mobile by checked Expose in the Mobile Application checkbox.However, I would like it so that when I click on the Project ID in the Generic Inquiry, it navigates to the Project screen in the Acumatica Mobile app. Could you please assist me in achieving this? Regards,Sagar
hello, I have a lot of problems getting an import scenario to work creating time cards for employees who don't have one. This works from time to time, sometime not, and as soon as I activate the condition I have no results, and no little diagnosis.Can you help me?THANKS Generic inquiry with Action button Import scenario Import scenario - Condition My final goal is to have two step(two different import scenario) in the business event :1st one is a Create time card and submit it , with Source restriction EPTimecard_Status Is Empty2st one is a Submit time card only , with Source restriction for EPTimecard_Status Is NOT Empty
Looking for best practices on adding change orders to an existing commitment?Right now we’re adding line items to the bill but I don’t think that’s the proper way to capture a commitment change order. If anyone can link a video on how to do this or describe best practices it would be very helpful! Thank you!
We have run into the problem where if we need to adjust an invoice from a service order and they choose the correct invoice, then correct the invoice and release it. Acumatica creates a credit memo for the original invoice and then creates a new invoice where the corrections are made. This is good, but the problem is that it marks the appointment status where the original invoice was created from billed to closed. The appointment then gets rebilled by because it doesn’t show as billed anymore. creating 2 invoices for the same appointment. Is this a bug or a configuration issue?The process that does work is to cancel the invoice and go to the appointment, make changes and rebill through the original process. The next question is, how can we disable the correct invoice action only for service orders, so we don’t double bill customers?
Hi there, Wondering if i could get some guidance regarding the below I am trying to filter ALL items under that branch (Available or not) but when i untick the Show Available Items Only, it does not show any of the other items that have 0 qty.Could this be a system glitch or am i missing something Thanks
