I have a question about conflicting role access. as far as I can tell from reading in the forums it doesn't seem like there should be any access that is able to be conflicting as it should default to whatever role has more access. All of that being said we continually have issues Where our roles are conflicting with each other and the access that they have. has anyone else had this issue? like i said reading through the forums it doesn't seem like it should be an issue. but we’ve seen it time and time again when assigning roles.
conflicting role access
Best answer by MichaelShirk
We’ve run into this issue as well. I would go so far as to call it a bug, though we haven’t reported it to Acumatica as a bug, so it hasn’t been confirmed.
Even though the documentation says that “Most Permissive” wins, that is not always the case.
It appears from my experience that a user’s roles are evaluated in alphabetical ascending order. When a user has a LESS permissive role, AFTER (alphabetical) the more permissive role, the user will sometimes lose access that they should have, based on their more permissive role.
The work around is to create an additional role with the most permissive, COMBINED permissions of the two roles that are conflicting, and assigning that role to the user instead of the two conflicting roles.
Make sense?
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.