Topics started by dgodsill97
A store credit is given to a customer manually in Big Commerce. The customer can apply store credits to their order. What type of payment method should be used in Acumatica for the processing and accounting? You would think this is really a discount because you never did a transaction in Acumatica for this. Even if you created a credit memo on account in Acumatica, this is no way to create a store credit in Big Commerce.
A client has two web stores being synced to the same Acumatica tenant. One store, B2B only, will only use customer group pricing (AR Sales Prices by Customer Price Class) with a fallback to Default price and the other will use the Default pricing with occasional specials. The default price in a Big Commerce store can only be updated from the stock item or template item. The client wishes to update the default price on the B2Cstore using AR Sales Prices because the price may be different from the stock item default price for the B2B customers. Unfortunately the Base Price and Price List entities do not allow Export Mapping.Has anyone had this issue and how do they resolve it? Is it even possible to customize the sync process?
We need to map an attribute to the BC default price. For non-matrix items we can do that. When syncing the template does the process use the Stock Item mapping or does not sync use the template mapping and uses the stock item data?
It’s important for a number of clients to get confirming of price and delivery from the vendor and not allow receipt of goods with confirming the PO. Manually you could keep the PO on hold or add something to the workflow. Does anyone know of a way to “force” the vendor to confirm the PO perhaps some integration to DocuSign or Adobe sign that could communicate back the customer that the vendor has received and confirmed the PO. The vendor of course could offer a different price and/or delivery,
There are only 2 choices to show available for the web store. My client would prefer that negative available is ignored and factored into the calculations. In the example below, they want to see 10.This is an example I set up and tested with the store setting for Availability Mode for Available and Available for Shipping.When set to Available the store shows a qty of 8 When set to Available for Shipping it shows 20 If I allocate the sales order for the 10 pieces it changes to either 8 or 10. Generally, we do not set the sales orders to allocate because it ties up inventory you could use for orders with earlier ship dates. Unfortunately, there is no way to allocate orders based on date.
A client with an existing Shopify store connected to their legacy ERP uses variants but they do not wish to utilized Matrix items in Acumatica. Instead the just want to have each variant as a individual SKU in Shopify. The Shopify help says to delete the variants and the default. They want to continue to sell the SKU’s in their store. For example SKU 1234 has ‘’, A , and B as variants and they want to have them as1234, 1234A, and 1234B as individual SKUs
The Description tab (InventoryItem.Content) is exported as HTML and I need to import that data into another tenant. I created a GI to export the data but when importing the data does not appear correctly.It should look like this.FlowLinX Sanitary Fittings are designed for single use fluid transfer applications where sanitary processing is critical. They are available in 3/4” and 1-1/2” flange sizes and can be easily assembled with silicone and TPE tubing. FlowLinX Sanitary Fittings are available in polypropylene material and are compatible with other TC flanges made to ASME-BPE specifications. SPECIFICATIONS:· Pack Size: 25 Fittings per Bag But I get this._x000A__x000A_FlowLinX Sanitary Fittings_x000A_are designed for single use fluid transfer applications where sanitary_x000A_processing is critical. They are available in 3/4” and 1-1/2” flange sizes and_x000A_can be easily assembled with silicone and TPE tubing. FlowLinX Sanitary_x000A_Fittings are available in polypropylene material
A client was using the formula MonthName(@MonthStart,-1) in a column heading. Obviously this use the current date and does not allow the specification of a starting period. Using Report.FormatPeriod(@StartPeriod,-1) gets the period as 10-2021, 09-2021, etc. Is there another formula that would return the description of the period as Oct 2021, Sep 2021 etc?
Login to the community
Social LoginLogin with your Acumatica account
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.