Use CaseMy client runs an in-house repair shop. They are using service orders to manage in-house repairs on equipment. There are open service orders where stock items are already consumed on the repair. The service order can’t yet be closed because further work needs to happen. ProblemWhen a physical count is generated, the items already used on the service order are still considered “on-hand” by Acumatica. This causes the physical count to display higher book quantity than there actually is on the bin. This can cause stock items to be reduced too low by mistake. For example:I have 13 stock item X on hand I used 2 on an open service order I generate a count, which displays 13 on hand During the count, I input 11 as Physical Quantity The system adjusts 13 stock items down to 11 I close and bill my service order This process further reduces stock item X by 2 units Now I have 9 in the warehouse, whereas I should have 11 in the warehouse. I have adjusted down the Item X by 2 units during t
I couldn’t find a way to entre a Sales Quote Line and associate a Target Equipment ID. Is there any way to do that?Thanks.
I am implementing FS for a client and wondering how can we utilize the Resource Equipment functionality. I have a few easy questions for the community:What is the Resource Eq used for today? Is there a functionality to create a Resource EQ record from the PO Receipt? How do I schedule a resource EQ for a service order/ appointment? Where do I link/reserve a resource EQ for an appointment? Appreciate any insights. Thanks!
What is the best practice when it comes to Inventory Replenishments versus MRP. In what cases does it make sense to utilize IN replenishments and in what cases does it make more sense to use MRP?If I am implementing MRP for a client, then should I even utilize IN replenishments or utilize MPR Only?From my understanding, it sees I should use IN Replenishments for items that have nothing to do with a BOM. For any item (FS, Sub Assembly, Raw Material) that’s included in a BOM, it seems that MRP is better suited for such stock-items. Wondering how other consultants approach this.
Requirement: We have an Import Scenario to import project transactions. The Sub Account value needs to be assigned from the default cost sub account set for each project. As part of the import source file, we have the project ID in the source file. Then for the that Project ID, I want the system to populate the sub-account from the default Cost Sub Account set on the project in Acumatica. Is this doable?
A client of mine transfers products to their field reps through out US. Each rep is configured with their own WH in Acumatica. These transfers are for products that a customer requested as part of an appointment. As far as I am aware, Acumatica can not charge a customer carrier account for a TR shipment. Wondering if someone else came across this .. or has a customization developed? Client is using ShipEngine.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.