#Laura02 - We have this setup for all the 1099 vendors, but it doesn’t seem to auto populate when invoices are created through a PO. ThanksJeremy
Hello Debbie,What did you end up doing? I assume this is the MN ESST law. I am working on this same issue.Thanks,Jeremy
Hello,I take my yearly interest cost and divide over the year equally. its not perfect, but it balances at the end. Then on a yearly basis I review my transactions, tie off to statements/loan balances and re-adjust my recuring transactions for the upcoming year. Thanks,Jeremy
@Laura02 Thanks, that solves a different problem for me :-) For GL insurance allocation, I suppose you could use WC code as a trigger for the allocation? This would create 5-10 allocation rules? Jeremy
I think this would be a good product enhancement idea. Thanks,Jeremy
Hello Hedi,Since we create the invoice from the owner payments for subcontracts we want to show all the changes from the payment/owner qty at once. We run a report that shows the qty’s paid. if the owner deducts qtys we need to show the negative quantities. It is common for the owner to pay then deduct. Or deduct one line item to pay a different line item. It happens on 95% of our projects. We generally worry more about qtys then dollars. If the qty’s work out, the dollars work out. So if we show positive numbers with negative dollars it will create the potential for errors, and cause confusion If we export data with positive numbers it wont tie off. I am sure we can write a report to handle this, but entering positive numbers for a deduction is out of standard practice for us. We also found out, how do you create a back charge to a subcontractor. We would typically do this with a negative quantity change order, but you cant put negative qty’s in a subcontracts. Just negati
If the employee does not have the benefit in there employee settings, its still reducing the benefits? I am not seeing that on my end. If an employee has a benefit, it is then reducing the rate. My issue is the the calculation on how it reduces the rate. I have a support case in asking about this issue. The best work around I found is to not Annualize the benefit and then change the annual hours and weeks in there employee profile to one 40hr week.This at least gets it close.The bottom screen, the HPEO is our employer sponsored health insurance. The $287.56 is the weekly cost of that insurance. Divided that by the 40hrs it seems to be reasonableJeremy.
I think your Right. The report is by tax zone, not individual taxes. The tax zone is made up of two taxes, 6.875 and .25/.5 rates. So the total is double because the group has 2 rates. I need a total for each tax, not each zone. I tried playing with the input-ouput, but that made things negative numbers. I think i need to modify the report? Thanks for the helpJeremy
Has anyone heard of updates to this issues? We are new to Acumatica and just discovered the same hole with Certified payroll reports.We are in Minnesota and the forms aren’t filling out correctly at all. They don’t show the fringe rates correctly on page two. The report only shows hours/base rate, no fringe detail. Has anyone made a report they would be interested in sharing/selling?Or offer suggestions on what they did to make a work around?We are on build 22.212.0046Thanks,Jeremy
Already have an account? Login
Enter your username or e-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.