Distribution

Wondering how others have dealt with this in the past or if there is an option or way through low code no code options to handle this - when you are shipping in Acumatica there is no requirement to pack the items or pack the shipment in full. This can lead to data and reporting not really making sense especially when things like EDI or other integrations are involved. We would like to ensure that when someone is shipping that everything that was picked on the order gets packed into packages, but there is not currently a way to set this up.It seems like something simple that there should be an option for this already. How have others handled this? 

Example :Inventory ID : B001How to i create 3 Barcode for B001 - BH, B001 - BOX, B001 - KARTON ?so, i can scan according the barcode,if i need 72 BH i can scan 1 - B001 - KARTON and 2 - B001 - BOX 

The AP Bill is generating a warning stating that some bill lines differ from the corresponding lines of the related Purchase Order. We have verified that the PO, Purchase Receipt, and AP Bill values are consistent, including the quantity, UOM, unit cost, amount, and PO line linkage. However, the detailed warning for the related PO line shows an Unbilled Quantity of 0.00 KG and an Unbilled Amount of 0.00 CAD, with a unit cost of 4.2000 CAD per KG. What else could be the reason for this. ?

The PO receipt screen used to show the $ of the receipt so our purchaser could verify both $ and qty.  Now only the qty is there.  Why was the $ removed and can it be included again?

Environment: Acumatica 2025 R1, Distribution edition with Advanced Kitting (Acumatica Labs Program). We’ve been live since July 1, 2026 so we're still new to Acumatica.Before realizing there was a Bill Separately checkbox, a consolidated invoice was created for a customer covering many sales orders in July. Because each SO has its own PO, the customer requires separate invoices. Normally this would not be a big deal to cancel and recreate separate invoices, but in this case every line on those orders was a non-stock digital item that doesn't require physical shipment. Attempting to Cancel or Correct the invoice generates the error:"The invoice ###### cannot be canceled because it includes line or lines linked to an order that does not require shipping."(This thread confirms the same constraint for Correct Invoice, but with no remedy: unable-to-correct-invoice-25053) With both actions unavailable, in August I created a credit memo manually in AR301000 for the full amount, released it, a

OK, this one may sound off the wall but bear with me.  The WMS Screens like Pick/Pack/Ship, Scan and Count, etc. in the mobile app (as well as the web page versions) have sounds they play on successful and not successful scans.  I just call them “Beeps” (good) and “Bongs” (bad).We have a mix of serialized and non serialized product.  And sometimes we have product that the vendor serializes but we choose not to.  When we are doing WMS operations, our crew aren’t always looking at the screen; instead they’re scanning item after item.  And so we’ve had plenty of times when operations like counts have created new serial entries, because they scan product 1234, which expects a serial, but they instead scan the next product 1234.  Or they scan product 5678, which isn’t serialized but has a serial number field on the box which they scan as the next product.  They get a Bong and wind up rescanning the first 5678 again, increasing the count.It would be great if we could replace the sounds and i

How to deleted Attribute setup in ItemClass Attibutes tab?

We are using MRP as the Planning Method and Inventory Planning Exceptions (AM403000) as the purchaser’s daily exception screen.Our system-wide Stocking Method on AM100000 is Reorder Point.Here is a representative purchased item:Quantity on hand/available for shipment: 4,250 Open sales-order demand: 17,000 Open purchase-order supply: 23,500 Reorder Point: 10,750 Safety Stock: 0 Min. Order Qty.: 250 Lot Size: 250 Max. Order Qty.: 0 By quantity and date, the existing supply covers the customer demand. The lowest projected balance is approximately 2,500, and the ending projected balance is exactly 10,750.  However, AM403000 produces Expedite exceptions against nine PO lines totalling 18,500 units. It appears that MRP is trying to restore the full reorder-point quantity as early as possible, rather than distinguishing between:Supply that must be expedited to fulfil an actual customer order on time. Supply that is only rebuilding inventory toward the longer-term target. This makes AM403000 d

Hi all,So, I’ve been experimenting with Vendor Locations. A Vendor can have different locations tied to it. Is there a way to have the same items but with different pricing under each location so that a purchaser can simply select the right location and Acumatica will load in the correct pricing?We have a vendor whom we order from the factory at one rate and from their US warehouse at another rate. Same items, different locations, different pricing.It’s weird in that when I go into the ‘Vendor Inventory’ screen, a checkbox called ‘All locations’ exists that you can check to ensure pricing is the same across all locations, but I don’t see a way to change individual location pricing for the same item.Joseph

Any idea as to what transaction this warning is referring to? or is there a scenario where the unfreezing won’t work? 

We have a large customer that places multiple orders per week. Since the customer has central receiving we think it will make the most sense to create a bulk Batch Pick List for picking purposes. However, the delivery route that services this customer INCLUDES SHIPMENTS FOR OTHER CUSTOMERS as well. These “other orders” would be on a separate Pick List, and hence a different Picking Worksheet and Truck Manifest.In this scenario, Is there a way for us to create a Batch Pick List from one set of shipments for picking and then re-create another Pick List to include the batched shipments with the shipments for other customers? Or, can separate Worksheet #’s be combined into one Truck Manifest? I’d rather not have our drivers have to carry two separate manifests. THanks.mikeSanico, Inc.

I’m a wholesale distributor with my own fleet of delivery trucks and daily delivery routes. Is there a way in Acumatica to sequence individual shipments so they appear on the Truck Manifest IN THE SAME ORDER in which they would be delivered? OR since the Manifest is generated from a Picking Worksheet, is there a way to sequence shipments on the Picking Worksheet? Thanks.Mike PetersSanico, Inc.

Can we import the historical sales order into the system and Without creating Shipment and Invoice.

Hello,We'd like to know if Acumatica offers any rebate functionality that fits the following scenario:We purchase products from certain vendors who offer rebates on specific products when those products are sold to specific customers. These rebates can be either a percentage of cost or a fixed dollar amount, depending on the vendor agreement.The issue we're running into is that Acumatica calculates margin on sales orders using the item's Average Cost, which doesn't reflect these rebates.For example: if a vendor offers a 2% rebate on a product when sold to a particular customer, and that product's average cost is $10, we'd want the cost reflected on the sales order (and resulting transaction) to be $9.80 for that customer, not $10. Our sales price and margin should then be calculated based on that rebate-adjusted cost, not the standard average cost.We're not looking to change the item's actual Average Cost record, we just want to have the order/transaction use the rebate-adjusted cost f

I'm facing an issue with Acumatica 2026 R1 (Build 26.100.0175) while implementing hyperlink navigation in a custom Modern UI screen.ScenarioI have a custom screen generated using the Modern UI Generator. The OrderNbr column is displayed as a hyperlink using @linkCommand. @linkCommand("OrderSO")@columnConfig({    width: 250})OrderNbr: PXFieldState<PXFieldOptions.CommitChanges>; public PXAction<TSSOHistoricalData> OrderSO;[PXButton(CommitChanges = true)][PXUIField(DisplayName = "Order SO",    MapEnableRights = PXCacheRights.Select,    MapViewRights = PXCacheRights.Select,    Visible = false)]protected virtual IEnumerable orderSO(PXAdapter adapter){    Dictionary<string, string> parameters = new Dictionary<string, string>    {        { "OrderNbr", DetailsView.Current.OrderNbr }    };    throw new PXRedirectToGIRequiredException("OrderSOGITest", parameters)    {        Mode = PXBaseRedirectException.WindowMode.Layer    };}works fine in Classic UI facing issue in Mod

Looking for options on how to handle this scenario. I need a way to send an attachment that is sitting on a purchase order when PO moves to open status. Any ideas on how to accomplish this?

Hello,Really struggling with this one. Customer uses Crystal reports for a year on year analysis so can do full sql etc. I’m trying to reproduce this below in a GI and this is for a specific customer Where is becomes difficult is that when they go live there is no last year data although we will have a legacy dac and that is challenge when there is no option to do union, has anyone else achieved this ?

I’d love to visit with someone who is using DRP for imports. We import textiles from India and Turkey so we have purchase orders placed, receive goods to an ITR warehouse when we put a container on an ocean shipment, then transfer goods to our main warehouse to fulfill sales orders. Our goal is for DRP to keep the inventory in our main warehouse to a minimum while keeping supply flowing in the purchase orders and containers in the ITR warehouse. Obviously DRP generates a lot of data with the requirement plans, safety stock, planned transfer demand, forecasts, etc. I’d like to hear with anyone who is using DRP and importing goods from overseas using container shipments (no preference on what you use to track containers - just interested in the bulk nature of transfers instead of being able to transfer at any time to meet demand). What tips/tricks do you have to keep this user-friendly for purchasing and inventory management staff? How did you set up safety stocks in each warehouse? 

We have two separate companies setup and users are assigned to one or the other. Company A is associated with Warehouse A and Company B is associated with Warehouse B and restriction groups further prevent users from seeing the other company warehouse. However, when using the Next List button in Pick, Pack, Ship, the system attempts to assign open Pick Lists regardless of the warehouse. When it tried to assign a Pick List associated with a warehouse the user doesn’t have access to it throws an error: ‘The ###### pick list has been skipped because of an error. See the trace for details.’ There are no errors in the trace log. Essentially the user has to keep hitting next list and triggering an error until they get to a valid Pick List. Has anyone else experienced this issue/know of a resolution?Actual Error on Scanner 

We maintain a few different Shopify store that feed into Acumatica. One of them closed earlier this season and we had one store created to test out some functionality. As we are launching a few new stores we want to keep ACM clean. There is a delete icon in the Shopify stores toolbar but it is always greyed out. Is there a way to delete? 

I have enough stock item to adjust but after releasing it show the error message about

Hello,We are on Build 25.100.0054.6 and we were in contact with UPS for a separate issue we were encountering.They informed us in their communication the following:“Starting Q3, 2026, the lifespan of OAuth tokens will be reduced from 4 hours to 1 hour. This means your integration must generate a new token every hour instead of every 4 hours to maintain uninterrupted access to UPS APIs. If your integration is hardcoded to refresh tokens every 4 hours, you will need to update your logic”We are wondering if this will potentially change how the carrier is connected with Acumatica and if this change will impact the connection with Acumatica at all?Thank you!

Question for those of you in Distribution who have a custom website integrated with REPAY (or another payment provider).Our current process is that the customer enters their credit card information in the secure REPAY window on our website. The website then sends the sales order together with the payment token to Acumatica through the integration. We don't pre-authorize the card on the website. Instead, we pre-authorize it later in Acumatica as part of a scheduled process.The challenge is that if the authorization fails, the customer doesn't find out until later, which delays order processing and creates extra work for our Customer Support team.I'm curious how others handle this. Do you pre-authorize the card as soon as the customer enters it on your website, or do you wait until the order reaches Acumatica? If you do pre-authorize it right away, what amount do you use? Is there a common best practice for this?We're looking at moving the authorization earlier in the process so customer

I’m going live on Acumatica 8/3 (leaving DDI after 20+ years). We're an inventory-based B2B wholesale distribution business with our own fleet of delivery trucks. Since it’s cloud-based, I’ve been eager to see how much functionality we can get out of the mobile app…….my preliminary evaluation of the app is that it seems to have limited transactional functionality, but I’m eager to hear from folks in the community (especially users with their own fleet of delivery vehicles) how they leverage the app. Can the native app be used by delivery drivers for proof of delivery purposes? Is there signature-capture functionality in the app? Thanks.mikeSanico